Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300... 497
Corrected data. Shamil Murtazin → Victor Titov.
Corrected data. Leptopterna → Leptopterna dolabrata.
No, this one's not a typo: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=105562 I stand
Calvia decemguttata (Linnaeus 1758)
It will be easier. Here: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/838167 need to add the form Anatis ocellata (Linnaeus, 1758) and move. Then it'll be in openwork :)
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago / Shamil Murtazin → Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Imago / Shamil Murtazin → Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Syrphini → Eupeodes.
Corrected data. Cucullia lucifuga / Sergei Kotov → Cucullia lactucae / Oleg Pekarsky.
Almost all long-horned beetles is one of the main differences between the sexes: the length of the antennae.
Corrected data. Cucullia lucifuga / Sergei Kotov → Cucullia lactucae / Oleg Pekarsky.
Along the length of the antennae. And the male looks thinner and poizyaschnee females will. When the couple reach the hands lay out to make it visually clearer distinction.
Shamil, you're right. Type of indeed even Linnaeus described back in 1758 and from here come from Wolfrum, 1953 is unclear. Peter must be corrected))
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Well then, without question. My brother and verbs :)
Corrected data. Ptinidae / Imago / Shamil Murtazin → Ptinus / Male / Ivan Stogov.
For information: all types, which I will now load for a long time and correctly identified. I can not afford to load uncertain at that moment, when the site goes break in. In addition, thus it reveals what is not in the database (write in comments). Therefore, it is better not to get involved here :)
Alexander, what was it? What is the meaning of transport? That I'm just so species that are not found in the base casting to the admin panel, then to make it convenient to move into place. Help is there: http://www.zin.ru/aNIMAliA/Coleoptera/rus/trich_ru.htm Previously, he was cited as an MO O. eremita. But that was long ago and not true. Please do not interfere.
Well, what I say .... Distorting the law in this case (as well as in all) ((( From an ethical point of view, it will look ugly in relation to the author. Who knows but himself that he wanted to show this photo? No one.... Maybe he wanted to show the variability of sex? As I once here: http: // insecta.pro / ru / gallery / 38912 In my view these photos, which shows both sexes must not touch ...
Subspecies Gnorimus nobilis bolshakovi Gusakov, 2002 has been recently described from the isolated from the main range of the species population in the Tula region of Russia. Where, in fact, and the male and female.
Osmoderma barnabita Motschulsky, 1845
Osmoderma barnabita Motschulsky, 1845
Sorry, this image is already in admin yesterday overlooked ( It's definitely a male Igor Chalcosoma caucasus (Fabricius, 1801) Well, I say ....... We must do types: already start to grow little by little. I hope that in the near future will scatter them where it is necessary :)
Especially without the author's consent to split (divide) photos can not. It will not be easy editing and split the author intended the composition to which it has the appropriate rights) In such cases, we must first seek the consent of his. Let it be as it is.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Palaearctic.
In the words of several collectors butterfly is common in Primorye and the male the species is active during the day, and the female flies at night, the light (ie active at night). Hence my question to our Far Eastern comrades :) How dedicated my information is correct, and if it is, give the description of a species or not?
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 40—46 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → August.
In my opinion, too, is nothing more than the "collector's item" does not fit. Yet in some cases, you may need "Side view" or "profile view" (your choice) :) For example: male rhinoceros beetles (Dynastinae) is often required to show in this view to be seen horns on his head and pronotum they are more visible eye once again on the side.
Well, right now until they bear little :) And what about the instance of the entomological collection in this you are right. You've got to think. The truth is nothing else comes to mind (
Here, too, it is necessary to turn the hands. More can help capture the geography.
Corrected data. / → Chalcosoma / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. / → Chalcosoma / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Prior to the form of photos of these comrades to determine very problematic (
Corrected data. / → Dorcus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Diptera → Eristalinus.
Corrected data. Diptera → Helophilus.
Corrected data. Diptera → Eristalis.
Corrected data. Diptera → Eristalis.
With the "Spanish fly" everything is normal :)
Reset.
Normalyuno. The most that :)
Corrected data. Imago → Larva.
Do bedbugs larva called a nymph, butterflies, caterpillar, and in essence it is still a larva. Just due to the expansion of scope of the site should be the "caterpillar" was renamed "larva": this is universal for all insects, including butterflies and bugs.
Corrected data. Pachnoda marginata → Pachnoda marginata peregrina.
Corrected data. Pachnoda marginata → Pachnoda marginata peregrina.
News
- 24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
- 24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
- 17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
New photos (27.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 9:15, V. Kolesnikov: Петр, спасибо за Душевный разговор ...
- 7:53, E. Komarov: Виктор Колесников На inaturalist ...
- 22:45, P. Khramov: / Imago / → Eurydema oleracea / ...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Entomological seminar in Moscow on November 13
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- New Zealand struggling with butterfly-killing plant causing monarch butterflies' death
