Pages: 1 ...296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304... 497
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lucanidae / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Dynastidae / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Dynastidae / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Male. He's such a nogasty unlike females. Yesterday, all of the world's nogastogo beetle uploaded: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42790 :))
Perhaps this is one of the most beautiful, revered and rare European longhorn beetles :) I do not like Wikipedia, but despite this bring out the link because I think about the form that it reflects the most objective: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Альпийский_усач to. Yuri Semeykin.You hour not found in your Primorye, Far Eastern jewel Rosalia coelestis Semenov, 1911 ...
Aphrodisium (Aphrodisium) rufiventris Gressitt, 1940 Synonyms: Aromia faldermannii subsp. rufiventris Gressitt, 1940 = Aromia (Tomentaromia) faldermanni subsp. rufiventris Gressitt, 1951 = Aromia rufiventris Breuning, 1956 = Aphrodisium (Aphrodisium) rufiventris Podaný, 1971 Also no view and it is necessary to add.
According to the new classification of pre-existing as a separate detachment of damselflies (lat. Homoptera) merged with a group of Hemiptera (lat. Hemiptera).
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina → Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina → Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina → Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Svetlana, beetles Coleoptera or one unit - Coleoptera))) Here, in the image appear to some tropical representative squad Orthoptera (lat. Orthoptera) superfamily of locusts (lat. Acridoidea). Not undertake to carry as he himself know whether tropical Orthoptera (
Rare in the Moscow region, and my first view of his discovery) As recently as last winter professor NB Nikita: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/nikitsky.htm I was not interested, I collected this kind in the suburbs. I replied that there was not going to ....And suddenly this summer and collected and not just anywhere, but at the balcony)) Reported finding Nicholas B. and he replied ...
Underside. To put daw "The underside (bottom wing)" I did not have :) Well, what is the bottom of the wings? Peter, in connection with the expansion of the site offers a jackdaw "The top of the wings" and "The underside (bottom wing)" renamed to simply "top" and "underside" and then the beetles and pr. jackdaws insects current name already awkward.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Batocera victoriana / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Pro-base could not ask: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/specie.asp?Id=34&Tipo=T Tomorrow will be the source of the database.
It is a subspecies of tricincta (Duncan, 1835) kind of Thysia wallichii (Hope, 1831) It is necessary to Lamiinae: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/842328 doing tribe Ceroplesini Thomson, 1860 with childbirth: Ceroplesis Dejean, 1835 Cochliopalpus Lacordaire, 1872 Diastocera Dejean, 1835 Gnathoenia Thomson, 1858 Mimoceroplesis Breuning, 1967 Paranaleptes Breuning, 1937 ...
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Aristobia approximator / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Peter, and that there is some alternative? At least until the site itself is not seen. Only will increase the number of photos to a certain detachment ( I have a general definition of the definition as such is not seen though you burst .....
Again kick the French site: http://www.coleoptera-atlas.com/cerambycidae-chrysomeloidea/lamiinae/batocerini/rosenbergia/Rosenbergia-straussi There's this kind of mistake is exposed as a Rosenbergia straussi Gestro, 1876 But the same blooper is inherent to many souvenir sellers: http://www.insectopia.ru/index.php?productID=667 And considering that the Tob according to some major share of the ...
Were it were determined - was, would do fine. Fedor before you upload photos recommend first contact here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=138133 The fact that there are very good. dipterologi good, of which is on the site is not known, and catch up, ever.
Both mustache, alas lost ( Apparently in a fight .... to Svetlana Schavelina: I remember you had already defined this type of site (unfortunately I do not remember where). I want to ask you to put the photo.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Batocera rubus / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Note: many sources of barbel incorrectly defined as a subspecies of the sulphurea of another member of the genusCelosterna pollinosa Example: http://www.coleoptera-atlas.com/cerambycidae-chrysomeloidea/lamiinae/lamiini-agniini/Celosterna/Celosterna-pollinosa-sulphurea That is true certain: Celosterna pollinosa var. sulphurea Heller, 1907 : http://www.cerambycoidea.com/foto.asp?Id=1867 ...
Peter. Because under the kind of impossible to put a photo or a butterfly or beetle ...... Actually anyone. And pay attention to the page of the form on the right there is not already uploaded photos. It was already a story and again arose. It is necessary to improve.
Nicholas, let me ask. What should have been a double load photo # 42551? Not because, you see, that no one has commented on the first photo? To be honest: I wanted to comment, but did not for ethical reasons (besides unflattering words do not come to mind).
Again transfer flew (( Igor, something changed. The site does not stand still, and developing: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/41122 It is not necessary to write a subspecies of the top line :) Now you can put directly to the subspecies, race (if the species is not known), family (if the genus is unknown), etc. Here I am I correct in relation to innovations.