Pages: 1 ...300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308... 497
The reason for changing the definition of authorship served adjacent to the butterfly group, which yesterday was identified by Alexander.
Probably because of this innovation is now, and not all kinds of photos are displayed on the right of this page? Regarding the meaning of use: still do not think this is correct. There is enough for all the logic of information on the subspecies of the title, and only the reference should be to look at.
Peter, now substantially delivered me a question. So it should be? If it's a technical glitch - it is necessary to fix :))
Alexander seems to me that we are conducting "talk about anything". If the link is meant to mean the form in it and needs to be established even if the page type can be infa subspecies. A page ultimately belongs mind not subspecies. There are separate pages subspecies - are appropriate and links indicating the subspecies.There are also links-figuratively speaking incorrect. I am sure many will ...
Alexander, if it were separate pages were then subspecies, would be unprincipled. If there are no pages and all links are on the page of the form it means that they should be called the same, not differently. Here "Description Trogonoptera brookiana trogon" And here; http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30810 "Description Trogonoptera brookiana albescens" But in the end both links lead to one place ...
And there is now a reference reads: "Description Trogonoptera brookiana trogon ", and leads to the description of the species. Why subspecies of a link in the registers? It should not be
From the top of the line did not remove anything since subspecies of a different description and year avtorsva unlike nominative. In my opinion it can not be neglected) Peter, after the transfer to the subspecies is missing a reference to the description of the species. Correct, please.This link will be Dolna every photo, regardless of what is shown on it nenominativny subspecies.
Leon, could be safely put in females. This form is only for females. I think that if you know the form - you know, and kind :) It is strange why she stood uncertain.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ornithoptera priamus priamus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.
The subspecies is unlikely Lee. Butterfly has 3 forms. Yes, and the view is very variable in color. Most likely this is due, and.
Alexander is a distinct seasonal forms for which there is a description. Yes, I just suffered one and saw that good at it, though. And it is more convenient for the average user. And so, yes, absolutely agree: chaos is not needed. Because other types did not carry such a well-Makar: only made an exception for this kind where a lot of great photos.Though in the order cited :)
Hyles so often done before will pupate. Like Kukula not know. If so, then the last age, and is, an automaton. Just wondering.
How should it look for this specific form where 3 codes are known form .. I think so. All forms are placed on shelves: Spring in the same block. Summer in another block. And in each block are invited to download the photo concrete form. And directly on the page type has all photos.Subspecies name (if any will be picked up at this level), then we can add a second line. The question is: I ...
Who I spread views on the forms and drew attention to the fact that in the form autosubstitution subspecies jump. Peter, you have to fix it. The forms are not subspecies. There are only two subspecies: A. l. sachalinensis Shriôzu, 1952 and A. l. wladimiri Kardakov, 1928 . And twice the specified A. l. levana. : Remove excess.