Pages: 1 ...369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377... 497
My verdict: C. lineosa is still :) Now once again both species gradually completed on the site and found thatCechenena subangustataI have the same collection of lineozy and it is very different. Even outwardly it is much larger and almost green :)
Good view. In the Moscow region is rare and local, it is found in bogs. My dream is to find yourself, but still can ....
Not enough subspecies, which kind of shows: Meganoton analis sumatranus Clark, 1924 It should be added.
And I think that the two commentaries, the same its way :) Type: 1) 26.09.2014 0:08 type is not defined → Asota kinabaluensis / Just some / Alexander Zhakov. 2) 26.09.2014 0:10 type is not defined → Asota kinabaluensis / Just some / Vasiliy Feoktistov And then, in fact, the number two interchanges definition in favor of the number one. Can not be so?
Most likely Ischyja inferna male, Swinhoe, 1902. If right, will add the species. More opinions needed.
I've got a few lineosa in my collection, successfully identified. Am to check later. Weird lineosa imho.
I've checked http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Boarmiini/boarmiini_5_1.php No abdomen there though (seems it has been prepared), generally agree. Moving. Moreover the link Irina gave clears that up, no questions.
Peter note. Invalid comment about my transfer from 9/26/2014 0:10. I could not bear to determine and oprelelyal independently in one and the same time, with Alexander and he could not see that he has already suffered.Just get a patch in time and automatically test: I allegedly suffered determine that it would be very ugly, with my hand, it happened really.
If this is subspecies, that could clear the situation. I gave link to nominative, didn't consider subspecies. Will check. Number 1 task for tomorrow. Alexandr, thanks.
Irina, I'll surely do tomorrow and will put all dots on i :) Daytime I could surf the web with my phone only, so sadly can't check....
Irina, rather not if rely upon Japanese guys: http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Dilophodes_elegans_elegans.html On others either... I've digged lots on this, there are lots of images where it's identified to gender only ( Hard nut it is, alas (
In my opinion there is something wrong with the family. I understand Lymantriidae now Erebidae as a subfamily of the Lymantriinae : http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/190 necessary to understand. Or I do not understand? :)
Peter, take away, please photos here. It is transferred to another close species. I made a mistake this morning in the definition.
Irina, thank you very much for the correction definition. Went for the first-link and read the "Identification" It is clearly painted differences between the two: Of course, this is not the Penicillaria meeki , and Penicillaria jocosatrix bear
Imho this is it. There are 4 species in Far East (only one of them is absent in Moscow region). Yet waiting for other thoughts.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Ercheia cyllaria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.