Photo #11887: Boudinotiana notha

02.10.2013 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

02.10.2013 12:27, Sergei Kotov

This is exactly notha.

02.10.2013 12:24, Sergei Kotov This species is identified correctly.

27.03.2012 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Nevermind. I've just ignored the search but checked Archiearis genus first thinking thus far it still belongs to that.

27.03.2012 18:04, Peter Khramov

Weird... It should've autosuggested you a synonym then...

27.03.2012 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Uh-huh, got it. I just checked it up in Archiearis as usual. Faulty me :)

26.03.2012 22:35, Peter Khramov

Vasily, mind that you shouldn't have added the species to the database, so...

25.03.2012 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Namely, this is A. notha male if we look at its forewings http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/arc_not.htm.

25.03.2012 19:43, Marija Jaunkunga

No, that's another one.

25.03.2012 19:36, Peter Khramov

Hm. Isn't that the same one there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/11883?

24.03.2012 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I'll add the species once as it gets possible.

24.03.2012 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Rather could be moved to Archiearis notha (Hubner, 1803), "uncertain".

08.03.2012 14:27, Dmitrii Covalenco

Maybe, that's Archiearis parthenias?