Photo #28018: Lepidogma atribasalis

24.03.2014 9:39, Yuri Semejkin

Yes Il, the same. And the same with the autograph and wishes of the author.

24.03.2014 0:06, Irina Nikulina

Ure, only closer to the night read it, it's you we incognito)) Thank you! It is the same with dandelion green book (with the States. Inscription) "presentation" that you took in September 2010?) In it so much information? (photo to remind you poslala-)

23.03.2014 13:27, Yuri Semejkin

And not for Alexander! Good luck everyone !

23.03.2014 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov

Yuri thank you for clarifying the situation. Now just need to decide to make an adjustment in the blue or not. I am personally against it.and on the page of the form, it is necessary to point out that this kind of Now has a different name in the window "Synonyms and combinations of the generic" and the search engine will then issue the vyd, and will be a new directory under him all Peter remake :)

23.03.2014 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov

this is something I do not hit. :)

23.03.2014 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov This species is identified correctly.

23.03.2014 12:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well, then you Yury second :) I just 3177 (this is 3178's) message is already no anonymity. It is interesting: it is necessary to try "a guest" write :)

23.03.2014 12:30, Yuri Semejkin

Post I threw, only to get it somehow anonymous, that's written after that are designated as incognito.
On the Kirpichnikova Alexander, she actually many publications from different magazines to articles in various books. The most complete infa in the book, which I link to privel.Tam infa purely for ognёvkam.Description and drawings. The figures unfortunately, for the most part small, have some piece of shots.

23.03.2014 11:39, Irina Nikulina

Thanks for the detailed "excavation", Sasha. Still Stericta .. But we have yet to Lepidogma her stay, as I understand it?

23.03.2014 11:38, Alexandr Zhakov

That is not my message, I usually dogonku announce it I was. :) And with the work Kirpichnikova would be interesting to learn, for general knowledge.

23.03.2014 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Sometimes Alexander is from time to time :)

23.03.2014 10:05, Yuri Semejkin

Something like a message incognito happened ....

23.03.2014 4:25,

Generally it Stericta kogii Inoue & Sasaki, 1995. That's what they called it.
Now a little history. Hampson, 1900 speaks of it as a Stericta atribasalis Hmps. Next Inoue, 1982 calls it Lepidogma atribasalis Hmps; Further Kirpichnikova 1999 also calls it Lepidogma atribasalis and finally Inoue and Sasaki, 1995 describes it as it is now accepted -te Stericta kogii. Source: VA Kirpichnikova Ognёvki fauna of the Far East of Russia, 2009, page 111.

19.03.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov

Stericta atribasalis Warren, 1895 is something different, the author is other. :)

19.03.2014 16:13, Irina Nikulina

Alexandr, I was checking atribasalis, but in Stericta gender, it's everywhere there. Didn't find decent pics) Had no doubt with jpmoth) However the main is that the thing was finally found) Flew from Primorye) Synev says it's out in Primorye.

19.03.2014 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov

Irina, this moth is mentioned (pic) in the Key to the insects of the Far East of the USSR (vol. 5. p. 2. page 427, ill. 247(1). If it's there but no species name should check the original source, I spotted this by accident checking Latin names which you found. Got confused with the description year Stericta flavopuncta Inoue & Sasaki, 1995, what was before? So far relying on Synev as for Far East.

19.03.2014 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Lepidogma atribasalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.03.2014 15:16, Irina Nikulina

Quite interesting found! I met this species on Japanese website, Stericta flavopuncta http://www.jpmoth.org/Pyralidae/Epipaschiinae/Stericta_flavopuncta.html. There is no Stericta in Russia according to Synev. Neither found here any species of Stericta gender (nor in Epipaschiinae, some synonyms maybe?..) Nevertherless there is actually such moth in Russia, need to clear it up)