Insecta.pro Community

04.07.2011 14:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9534

P. rapae & P. napi.

30.06.2011 19:58, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9539

Boiled? (Judging by what's seen on this photo I'd stake on athalia, but it's a guesswork anyway...)

30.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9514

This species is identified correctly.

30.06.2011 1:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9494

Not semiargus. Rather amandus.

24.06.2011 23:16, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9442

L. tityrus.

22.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9414

O. sylvanus.

22.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9409

This species is identified correctly.

17.06.2011 1:21, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9357

If the same, then yes. :)

13.06.2011 16:36, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9357

IMHO, euphrosyne.

13.06.2011 16:35, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9285

Satyrium pruni.

13.06.2011 16:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9312

L. phlaeas.

13.06.2011 16:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9356

euphrosyne.

13.06.2011 16:31, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9255

This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2011 1:09, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9199

Seems to be N. abdominalis (not sure).

02.06.2011 1:09, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9236

L. tityrus.

02.06.2011 1:07, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9213

Yep.

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9204

Ja, ja-ja!

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9212

Ja.

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9200

Probably, N. abdominalis.

28.05.2011 0:04, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9168

P. rapae.

11.05.2011 0:20, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9094

Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi.

06.05.2011 18:17, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9076

Igor, would you please be more attentive to labels? Don't mind tityrus in Berminvody, but the 30th of November!

05.05.2011 17:10, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9062

IMHO B. daphne.

27.04.2011 1:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #5796

Imho, looks rather ilia indeed. Not fully sure though.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9030

P. icarus.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9027

P. icarus.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9023

E. argiades.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9024

E. argiades.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #9025

E. argiades. Surely. :)

27.04.2011 1:08, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #2509

This is certainly levana (provided that it was shot in Europe). :) There are antennas on its head, what io doesn't have.

12.04.2011 23:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8190

What's not exact there... (mechanical voice) There everything is exact! ;)

12.04.2011 23:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8379

Probably. Not 100% sure. Let's wait for Zygaena experts' opinions. :)

12.04.2011 23:48, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8520

Not argus. Most probably P. idas. There is idas checked by genitalia nearby this shot location.

12.04.2011 23:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8522

This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2011 23:45, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8521

This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2011 1:36, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8379

Don't know for sure.

12.04.2011 1:33, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8159

IMHO C. flocciferus.

12.04.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8166

C. flocciferus.

12.04.2011 1:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8190

O. sylvanus (male).

12.04.2011 1:22, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8178

C. palaemon.

10.04.2011 23:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8378

Z. filipendulae.

05.04.2011 19:17, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8282

I met it even at the end of September, in Crimea (rather worn-out), but November, imho, unbelievable.

05.04.2011 1:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Igor, would you please say something about this butterfly? Where and who caught it, to what collection and so on.

05.04.2011 1:29, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Even if it was pirithous on the photo, there still would be huge doubts about label, Imho...

05.04.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Hey, we're not identifying it as "what do we have similar in Europe?" ;)) The label was definitely mistaken.

05.04.2011 0:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8282

30th of November??? No way.

05.04.2011 0:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8279

Imho, this is not miracle at all, just mistaken labels (sorry to the author...). It's not pirithous. Either not Leptotes.

31.03.2011 1:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8271

Yeah, I can see the photo was originally not good. Sorry and sorry once more for such unreasonable harassment. :)

30.03.2011 23:13, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8271

I mean large size. Think, Evgeny is right. This noise "rainbow" around antennas was just so glaring... Even though it's Apatura. ;)

30.03.2011 20:24, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #8271

And I'm like a broken record... :) Petr (and Roman), I want to ask if this visual "noise" around antennas was in original shot or as a result of retouching? If last, put this retouching software to the garbage bin...

Talmeca gnoma Schaus, 1912

Notodontidae

Cryptocephalus reitteri Weise, 1882

Chrysomelidae

Evergestis nomadalis (Lederer, 1871)

Crambidae

Chilo christophi (Bleszynski, 1965)

Crambidae

Ethmia vittalbella (Christoph, 1877)

Elachistidae