Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...17 18 19 20 21 22 23

30.03.2011 20:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7981

Suppose, identified. :)

30.03.2011 2:16, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7981

IMHO, Acronicta rumicis.

30.03.2011 2:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7982

Melitaea didyma.

28.03.2011 2:38, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #4017

Chalk mountains do mean sooner Z. purpuralis. Was there thyme?

22.03.2011 23:47, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6484

Hm, some technical bug, maybe. Yu. A. Chistyakov could hardly identified it like this. Imho, this is some Arctiidae. (Just for the record, there is no A. statices in Primorye region at all).

22.03.2011 23:42, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6833

Probably, Z. loti.

22.03.2011 23:42, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6837

How come two shots are dated the same day, 2008/6/18 and 2008/6/18, but made in different places, Voronezh region, Pavlovsky hood, Petrovka village neighborhood, Shypov forest, and Vladimir region, Krasny Mayak forestry? What's true? These shots seem to be of the same caterpillar.

22.03.2011 23:39, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6837

Not minos. Probably, Z. loti.

22.03.2011 23:38, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6834

Not minos. May be Z. loti.

22.03.2011 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #3808

Not trifolii. ?Z. viciae.

22.03.2011 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #3744

Not trifolii. ?Z. viciae.

22.03.2011 23:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6849

There is no trifolii In Russia accorded to Synev-Efetov. This might be Z. lonicerae.

22.03.2011 23:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6847

There is no trifolii in Russia, according by Synev-Efetov. Seems to be Z. lonicerae.

22.03.2011 19:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7778

Think, this is B. ino too.

22.03.2011 19:52, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7783

Hm, doubt my own identification... :) Sorry... Rather B. ino.

22.03.2011 1:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7760

A. ilia.

22.03.2011 1:53, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7759

A. ilia.

22.03.2011 1:51, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7859

L. reducta.

22.03.2011 1:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7890

This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2011 1:44, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7777

IMHO N. xanthomelas.

22.03.2011 1:44, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7776

IMHO N. xanthomelas. Definitely not aglaia since it's willow tree.

22.03.2011 1:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7816

IMHO B. ino.

22.03.2011 1:39, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7773

This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2011 1:39, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7772

This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2011 1:31, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7783

B. daphne.

22.03.2011 1:30, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7877

M. athalia.

22.03.2011 1:28, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7821

B. dia.

22.03.2011 1:28, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7820

B. dia.

22.03.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7784

A. adippe.

15.03.2011 0:16, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6437

Summing up: according to the actual info (Synev catalogue; Identifier or insects of Russian Far East), in Russia andetria lives. By the way, in Japan it doesn't (there pryeri lives, and basically pryeri is more southern species). Don't know if both species live somewhere sympatrically (generally can guess, yes). Have nothing more to add. :)

15.03.2011 0:09, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7428

Good! I've asked just in case... :)

12.03.2011 0:20, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7687

P. napi.

12.03.2011 0:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7428

Why not (e. g.) britomartis? Checked it out?

12.03.2011 0:15, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7435

I. podalirius! Some technical bug may have happened. And moved podalirinus to Sochi, omg. :)

12.03.2011 0:10, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #7427

P. amandus.

09.03.2011 17:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #1013

IMHO, selene. :)

09.03.2011 17:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #3105

IMHO, euphrosyne.

09.03.2011 1:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #3105

This species is identified correctly.

09.03.2011 1:10, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6383

If so, then it's just impossible to identify two of these to the species rather sure, I think.

09.03.2011 1:08, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #1013

This species is identified correctly.

07.03.2011 15:04, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6437

It's allright... :) pryeri is the previous (wrong) name of andetria. Look through Synev catalogue.

06.03.2011 2:31, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6437

IMHO Neptis andetria.

06.03.2011 2:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6459

IMHO Ussuriana michaelis.

06.03.2011 2:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6436

Polygonia c-aureum.

06.03.2011 2:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6435

Polygonia c-aureum.

03.03.2011 0:31, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #4052

Th. lineola.

24.02.2011 18:45, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6383

Imho, this is just a guesswork. :) Is there any point to compare their stripes if we're not sure that its some diagnostic feature? We should have a look at their genitalia... :) One pro for lutea is that (as I found) adusta was found only on the very edge of the southern Primorye (Hasansky hood). "Veggies" are also interesting question as for these butterflies. This can be a good clue to identify!

23.02.2011 18:07, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6383

Hm... Don't know. Thought, this depends on color rendering. Maybe this is some individual feature. I have never been in the Primorye region and never seen this butterfly alive, so let's residents say something. :) Also this is harder, because there is J. adusta (another name is onoi) in the very South Primorye. Their appearances differ rather slightly. Anyway, they feed on different plants, so ...

23.02.2011 1:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #6366

As for today info, there is no adippe in Primorye region now (but closer species). Anyway, this butterfly is not adippe's relative. The more I look at it, the more I see ruslana.