E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485... 497

23.02.2012 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #1395

This is Maniola jurtina. Seems its male.

11.01.2012 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11743

Yeah, right: that's Phlaeas. Outta be moved.

02.01.2012 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11709

Or Maniola jurtina (always confuse these), anyway not Coenonympha at all.

31.12.2011 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11700

Seems to be. The angle is not handy though.

30.12.2011 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4186

The shot date should be changed to 2009/08/23. I've got on my personal page this very caterpillar "extended".

29.12.2011 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11616

By the way, if anybody has its common form? It'd be cool to get 'em here.

21.12.2011 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2970

That's the sole Charaxinae I've got. However, before I was gifted lots of such souvenir stuff.

21.12.2011 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2970

Dmitry, no matter, I added that. I promised to, whatsoever. That's good you reminded me cause I already forgot that.

21.12.2011 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2970

Specially as it's needed I poked out that souvenir thing this butterfly was put into with underside. Today I'll throw it in :)

21.12.2011 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11598

And, by the way, to "identified successfully: http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=318572.

21.12.2011 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2972

The underside uploaded. It's labelled with the shot date which should be marked there too. I'll add genus now and apply the species therein.

21.12.2011 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2972

Will be a little bit later on, I'll add it today to my personal page. Just as I've got it right ready to hand.

21.12.2011 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11598

Agree, it's better to define it as neumanni. I'll add a species now.

20.12.2011 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11598

Yeah, that's a bad deal with all these Eligma, I found just two species looked nearly twins. So that's why it's in "uncertain". Wash-out... Even though these are big and bright-colored moths, there is minimum information about...

20.12.2011 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11616

Ugh, thanks. I suspected that too, but its darkness confused me either I couldn't find an underside photo.

20.12.2011 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11617

The underside of a butterfly on #11616 photo.

18.12.2011 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11602

Might be moved to "identified successfully", I think? I relied on this when identifying: http://www.drlegrain.be/0nyungwe/jour/Pierinae/Pierinae.html#mylothris.

17.12.2011 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11599

The underside of the #11598 moth.

17.12.2011 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11601

The underside of a butterfly on #11600 shot.

17.12.2011 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11603

The underside of a #11602 butterfly.

16.12.2011 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6925

May be moved.

16.12.2011 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11566

The underside of a male on #11565 shot.

16.12.2011 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11571

Dmitry, thanks for identifying! Just as I'm ready to share three items of this species (this is a sole butterfly which came not single). But I'm interested in trading not selling. Let's deal it by e-mail, if needed.

16.12.2011 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11575

You did it right: this is the underside of a butterfly on #11574 photo.

14.12.2011 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6925

Hapigia annulata, Schaus, 1905?

13.12.2011 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11495

"Hey, I know the fella!" cause that's me who identified it :)

13.12.2011 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11495

This species is identified correctly.

13.12.2011 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3310

Petr, please, correct its type, this is not alive one :) Seems some bug.

29.11.2011 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2970

I'll add that later on. Have no time to reshoot it. Any doubts?

12.11.2011 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4195

I'm now doing the free Avast, this might stumble somehow (I'm about to change that soon to the favorite and reputable Dr. Web).

12.11.2011 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4195

Andrey, that's even weird. Mine had such a big reaction. Heuristics blocked that completely. The file attached seems to be clear though. Weird.

11.11.2011 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4195

Andrey, your mails are being blocked by my antivirus (can't get it thus): you'd better scan your system for some "evils".

11.11.2011 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #4195

Won't insist (I might have been wrong): what do people suggest?

03.11.2011 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10970

Male.

03.11.2011 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10924

Male.

03.11.2011 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10923

Male.

03.11.2011 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10915

Male.

03.11.2011 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10922

Male.

03.11.2011 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10918

Male.

03.11.2011 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10972

Male too.

03.11.2011 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10973

Man.

01.11.2011 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10944

This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5670

This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5542

This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5538

This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5539

This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5666

If it's actually Calliteara pudibunda??? Unhappily, I know only "red-tailed" caterpillars, so that's why I wonder.

26.10.2011 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5540

This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5541

This species is identified correctly.

14.10.2011 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7182

Oospila atopochlora, Prout, 1933, not sure. The species should be taken out of the database and put to "uncertan".

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.