Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486... 497

14.10.2011 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7283

Probably to "uncertain", there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/apatelodes-firmiana/.

14.10.2011 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3322

This is to move there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/calcaritis-pallida/.

14.10.2011 15:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6289

Move it there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/pero-polygonaria/.

13.10.2011 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7209

The species is actually there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/hemiceras-lissanella/. To move.

13.10.2011 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3522

Thanks! Was this in "undetermined" amidst mine or just the identifying's been corrected (can't remember now)?

13.10.2011 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10594

Your humble servant added a genus for this species few days ago. For that too: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/chrysozephyrus-smaragdinus/. Somehow, photo wasn't applied there.

10.10.2011 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10848

That's the very Acronicta psi (Linnaeus, 1758).

05.10.2011 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7209

Hemiceras lissanella, Thiaucourt, 1994.

01.10.2011 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10769

Hm, looks rather similar to Nemophora degeerella, Linnaeus, 1758? http://lepidoptera.ru/species/nemophora-degeerella/.

01.10.2011 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10771

This is Macdunnoughia confusa, Stephens, 1850.

29.09.2011 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10734

For sure, move out of machaons (better to Cerura vinula, "uncertain", as yet).

29.09.2011 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10734

Hardly Cerura felina (location is doubtful). Most likely Cerura vinula.

29.09.2011 7:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3662

This is Male.

28.09.2011 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10739

http://lepidoptera.pro/species/hyphantria-cunea/ Feeds on cottonwood too. Young caterpillars live socially in the beginning. So that's the puzzle. http://natlands.typepad.com/nlt_preserve_blog/2009/08/crows-nest-caterpillars.html A larger photo of this caterpillar needed.

28.09.2011 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10739

Please, don't. This is the very cottonwood: http://www.colostate.edu/Dept/CoopExt/4dmg/Trees/cotton.htm. But there are many more species that make nests over there. Rather "uncertain".

27.09.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10754

Male, underside.

27.09.2011 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10754

This species is identified correctly.

25.09.2011 8:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9488

Everything's doubtful, from color.

24.09.2011 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9488

I don't think so: http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=a6m0ze&logNo=130018277976&categoryNo=35&viewDate=¤tPage=1&listtype=0.

23.09.2011 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3026

Meh, I hurriedly comment it yesterday so that seemed vague. Nothing's wrong: the photo I linked as an example is a 100% sure S. lubricipeda caterpillar, that's all.

23.09.2011 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6771

Young Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Linnaeus, 1758): http://www.european-lepidopteres.fr/Phragmatobia-fuliginosa.html.

23.09.2011 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6767

Rather Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Linnaeus, 1758) http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/arc/phr_ful.htm.

23.09.2011 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3026

I've just got that link. Also, the same in a David Carter book, "Butterflies & Moths" Dorling Kindersley, London 1992 (a photo of a caterpillar what has this clearly seen red stripe).

22.09.2011 6:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6770

Spilosoma lutea (Hufnagel, 1766): http://www.kolumbus.fi/silvonen/lnel/a/spilutea.htm.

22.09.2011 6:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3026

The only one, true S. lubricipeda is there: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id42955/. The rest of caterpillars aren't. Tomorrow will try to clear it up (out for a day).

22.09.2011 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6771

Not S. lubricipeda.

22.09.2011 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6770

Not S. lubricipeda.

22.09.2011 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #6767

Not S. lubricipeda.

21.09.2011 8:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9781

To "uncertain" (photo seems from Yankeeland). Can't add synonyms: Actias bolli (Wagner, 1876) Actias maasseni, Kirby, 1892 Actias rossii, Ross, 1872 Phalaena luna, Linnaeus, 1758.

21.09.2011 8:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9781

This species is identified correctly.