E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483... 497

20.06.2012 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13320

Petr, move it where I said (no versions): http://www.ukbutterflies.co.uk/species.php?species=lathonia.

20.06.2012 7:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13320

Well-known caterpillar :)

20.06.2012 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13320

Issoria lathonia.

20.06.2012 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13318

Petr, I hurried to show this one just caught not to miss it, so no more photos but this "pinned". I uploaded the very unspread specimen because the color contrast seen better.

19.06.2012 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13292

Could be moved to "identified successfully" as well as #13291.

17.06.2012 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13185

Vindula erota male.

16.06.2012 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13205

Hem... What did you await? Don't they live on nectar alone.... :)

11.06.2012 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13105

Monopis monachella.

11.06.2012 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13102

Scopula floslactata.

11.06.2012 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13130

This firebrand is Monopis monachella :)

10.06.2012 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5771

Female. Yet kinda weird, I've never seen it had blue spots.

10.06.2012 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2440

Male.

10.06.2012 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2441

Male.

10.06.2012 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13153

Male.

10.06.2012 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #13154

Male.

07.06.2012 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2397

Female.

07.06.2012 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2790

Male.

05.06.2012 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12977

Lycaena dispar female.

05.06.2012 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12971

Lycaena dispar female.

04.06.2012 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12920

Scopula floslactata.

01.06.2012 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12877

This one is at least yellow a bit. Diaphora mendica black is way darker :)

01.06.2012 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12949

Danaus melanippus hegesippus (Cramer,[1777]): http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30040010.html.

01.06.2012 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12942

This species is identified correctly.

27.05.2012 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12867

One more male.

26.05.2012 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3419

Well, as I know they actually don't come to any light. These are exceptionally diurnal. I usually meet males on wet forest paths while females prefer to stay close to tree crowns. Talk seems to appear the kind of banter :)

26.05.2012 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10217

Oops, I seem to have erred since there is actually S. planus caterpillar that can't be supposed as an apposite one.

26.05.2012 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10217

There is also S. planus, not sure though how its caterpillar looks like.....

18.05.2012 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9556

Yes, turns out to be one since it has a wide ribbon. Though I've never seen females sitting that close to the ground, they usually prefer tree crowns.

18.05.2012 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12670

That's the very Phalera bucephala 100% sure.

14.05.2012 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12386

Alexandr, would you please share those links there http://lepidoptera.pro/community/2328, if possible? Petr, what about to fix somehow this "First aid kit" subj not to look it out within the full news feed? So hard.

14.05.2012 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12491

Seems to be the very Asota caricae (Fabricius, 1775), http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=70279.

14.05.2012 15:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12636

Today I've spread one more male as well :)

13.05.2012 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12636

Few more to add? :)

12.05.2012 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12657

Morpho polyphemus, Westwood, [1850]. It seems not to have synonyms, just subspecies.

12.05.2012 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12657

Yes, that's Morpho polyphemus as well as #12645.

12.05.2012 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12633

Petr, move all those to Pterostoma palpina since there can be no variants. I've just spread such thing myself :)

12.05.2012 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12645

Yes, I think it's very Morpho polyphemus. The underside is quite typical.

12.05.2012 7:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12568

This butterfly definitely got more sophisticated. It was always rather ordinary thing, even urban. Yet I didn't see it last five years, now I saw it again and in the very those areas where it used to be. Nymphalis genus is actually told by many people to have changed its demeanor. The explicit example could be Nymphalis polychloros that was rather common to meet before as against Nymphalis ...

11.05.2012 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12633

The fashion model: shot from all angles :) This is very Pterostoma palpina.

11.05.2012 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12636

This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12633

This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12626

This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12631

This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12623

This species is identified correctly.

06.05.2012 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12568

Yesterday I saw it again over here in Zheleznodorozhny town after many years (didn't pick it for a collection nor shot as I had nothing to make a photo). Yet it's still in Moscow region :) Though they said it was already not...

05.05.2012 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11532

Olga, to believe in wikipedia is kind of a big sin. Please, don't you rely upon it.

05.05.2012 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3113

I'll measure it and send you later by e-mail.

05.05.2012 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11532

I've got no doubt as for your identifying.

05.05.2012 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3113

Dmitry, the size is likely the one of D. chrysippus. Unfortunately, have no label just the information though word-of-mouth that it's from Taiwan. Why, any doubt?

05.05.2012 3:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11532

I've just checked it out. Dmitry is right, that's female.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.