Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Dear colleagues!
Is it possible to identify hymenoptera from South and South Kazakhstan?
Thank you in advance!

Pictures:

01_Hym._Apoidea__2013_03_20____.________.jpg — (290.06к)


02_Hym._Apidae.__MG_2013_07_06__.__________.________.JPG — (311.4к)


03_Hym._Apidae._2012_07_07____.________.jpg — (311.14к)


04_Hym._Apoidea.__2011_06_18_________._____.jpg — (321.58к)


05_Hym._Megachilidae._______2012_____.________.JPG — (139.51к)

Dear colleagues!
Is it possible to identify hymenoptera from South and South Kazakhstan?
Thank you in advance!

01 - Andrena sp.
03 - Tetralonia sp.
04 - Thyreus sp.
05 - Melecta sp.

Dear colleagues!
Is it possible to identify hymenoptera from South and South Kazakhstan?
Thank you in advance!

02-Eucera or something....

Help me with two more oskis from Malaysia. They are similar to the Eumeninae, but the wings are not folded at all, probably another subfamily altogether. Caught mowing in the meadow.


№1


№2

Help me with two more oskis from Malaysia. They are similar to the Eumeninae, but the wings are not folded at all, probably another subfamily altogether. Caught mowing in the meadow.

You're going the right way, comrade!
I mean, it's really a completely different subfamily. They are primitive social wasps from the subfamily Stenogastrinae (Vespidae). We don't have such things, so they are not familiar to many people.

No, not all of them. It is only the bee hives who are reluctant to accept the obvious. Well, they want to dykat, and not nykat-on health.

There were times when all burrowing wasps were divided not into 4 modern ones (in fact, there are only 3 of them), but already into 11 separate families. Echoes of that tradition of the late 19th and early 20th centuries can be seen even in the fundamental survey of hymenopteran families of the world's fauna. So what? Everything comes to a logical conclusion.

By the way, are you very concerned about the current systematic position of single folded-winged wasps or the same flower wasps?

I'm not a bee hive, as you know. With taxonomy of folded-winged wasps up to the level of subfamilies and tribes (except Eumeninae) I completely agree (I have big questions only with the division of Eumenines into tribes).
There are a number of issues with bees, despite the fact that they are much better understood. For example, the paraphyly of Melittidae s. l. (it is divided into Melittidae, Meganomiidae and Dasypodidae, which looks quite logical). In short, you can't just combine them. We need special work where all this will be taken into account, which families will be included in the rank of subfamilies, and which will be included as several subfamilies, which tribes will become subtribes, and which will be included as several subtribes, and so on. In principle, the work of Melo and Gonzalves (2005) is good, but this problem with Melittidae is not taken into account. Something so updated would have come out, maybe they would have started to recognize it...

... Something so updated would have come out, maybe they would have started to recognize it...

I fully agree about Eumenin - the matter is not very clear yet.
About bees is also no less confusing. Perhaps the same de Melo would have taken it upon himself to promote, but he is a Brazilian professor. And this is even worse than we have. He once complained to me that 90% of his time is spent on teaching, and there is almost nothing left for science. But I'm sure there's a good time for everything.
However, I was talking about the situation of bees in general, and not about internal bee fights.

Hello! Help with hymenoptera. I will be grateful!!
469crop - end of July, Rudensky district, Minsk region, Belarus.
487crop-beginning of August, Rudensky district, Minsk region, Belarus.
495crop-end of June, Rudensky district, Minsk region, Belarus.
531crop, 535crop - mid-August, Rudensky district, Minsk region, Belarus.
547crop-end of August, Slutsk district, Minsk region, Belarus.
554crop-early September, Rudensky district, Minsk region, Belarus.

Pictures:

469crop.jpg — (215.98к)


487crop.jpg — (216.15к)


495crop.jpg — (106.47 k)


531crop.jpg — (337.25к)


535crop.jpg — (255.53к)


547crop.jpg — (154.64 k)


554crop.jpg — (179.94к)

Hello! Help with hymenoptera. I will be grateful!!

547 - Babies from Craesus septentrionalis (Linnaeus, 1758)

Hello! Help with hymenoptera. I will be grateful!!
531crop, 535crop - mid-August, Rudensky district, Minsk region, Belarus.

Dasypoda nebos

Tell me, are the others definable before the family / genus?

Tell me, are the others definable before the family / genus?

495 this is the wasp Cerceris sp. male. I think experts will determine up to the species.
With the rest I am not very

Tell me, are the others definable before the family / genus?

535 these are Ichneumonidae..
probably the subfamily Ichneumoninae. But it's hundreds of views

what's so lovely?
from a cocoon found under the bark of a pine tree, Voronezh

Pictures:

IMG_3150.JPG — (277.18к)

what's so lovely?
from a cocoon found under the bark of a pine tree, Voronezh

Someone from the Braconidae.

Someone from the Braconidae.

if you believe this site, it turns out 2 options
Atanycolus neesi and Atanycolus initiator

This post was edited by Collector-08.03.2015 15: 20

if you believe this site, it turns out 2 options
Atanycolus neesi and Atanycolus initiator

According to the Tobias key, it can be A. initiator (Fabricius, 1793), A. fulviceps (Kriechbaumer, 1898), or A. genalis (Thomson, 1892).

Help me identify the animal. 19.06.2014, dacha plot, Mordovia. The same thing from different angles.

Pictures:

DSC00285.jpg — (427.79к)


DSC00291.jpg — (412.76к)


DSC00326.jpg — (429.61к)


DSC00333.jpg — (403.08к)

Help me identify the animal. 19.06.2014, dacha plot, Mordovia. The same thing from different angles.

Anthidium florentinum, самец

Good afternoon.
Is it possible to identify this bumblebee from a photo ? Germany 20mm

This post was edited by gstalker - 14.03.2015 17: 43

Pictures:

20150313_202503.jpg — (169.68к)


CM150313_20254401.jpg — (143.36к)


CM150313_20264002.jpg — (116.55к)


CM150313_20270403.jpg — (116.13к)


CM150313_20273104.jpg — (142.04к)

Krasnoyarsk Territory. I can't even decide on my gender.
slightly more than 10 mm. female.
the platbands to the top are narrowed with a shallow notch at the very top. Us. completely black. The very top of the thighs, legs and legs are red-brown. The front and middle tibia are blackened on the outside. Pronotum on the sides without spines, rounded. Zadneschitik behind vertical, at the top of the fine-toothed uniform denticles. The gap.segment on the sides with an edge, not rounded. 1st tergite without fracture, evenly rounded. Yellow stripes on 1-3 tergites. The tergules are larger than those of Odynerus

Krasnoyarsk Territory. I can't even decide on my gender.
slightly more than 10 mm. female.
the platbands to the top are narrowed with a shallow notch at the very top. Us. completely black. The very top of the thighs, legs and legs are red-brown. The front and middle tibia are blackened on the outside. Pronotum on the sides without spines, rounded. Zadneschitik behind vertical, at the top of the fine-toothed uniform denticles. The gap.segment on the sides with an edge, not rounded. 1st tergite without fracture, evenly rounded. Yellow stripes on 1-3 tergites. The tergules are larger than those of Odynerus

In my opinion, Euodynerus.
Alexander, I think, will be able to determine up to the species.

In my opinion, Euodynerus.
Alexander, I think, will be able to determine up to the species.

Yes Alexander thank you! You're probably right. I suppose it's E. quadrifasciatus. 2nd sternite at the base without an obvious longitudinal groove. The hairs are long on the head. breast and first tergite. The border on the top of the 2nd tergite is underdeveloped (this is what confused me when I went to the genus). My E. notatus had a wide border.

another vespid, a female. Krasnoyarsk Territory. 7-8 mm.
The hairs on the head and back are short. There is a clear small hole behind the eyes. Posteriorly rounded, sloping. The gap.a segment in a cell sculpture. the punctuation of the first tergite is rough and dense, while the second tergite is more sparse but obvious. Most of the thighs and lower legs are red, the legs are darker brown. Tegulae are red, rounded, and short.
Stenodynerus??

[quote=VBoris,05.03.2015 17:04]

Hello! Help with hymenoptera. I will be grateful!!

469crop - Ichneumonidae, Pimplinae, возможно Scambus sp.
487crop - Braconidae
535crop - Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae

if you believe this site, it turns out 2 options
Atanycolus neesi and Atanycolus initiator

Atanycolus neesi has a black head

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. May 20.
What can you say about these goosebumps?

Good health to all. Tell me, what kind of rider?
Label: June 2014, SW Primorye, Quercus wutaishanica woodlands, on the fly.
Nearby beetles are for scale.
[attachmentid()=217920]

This cryptina, as we have already mentioned, is probably one of the few species of the eastern genus Chlorocryptus: most likely, Ch. coreanus (Szepligeti, 1916) or Ch. purpuratus (Smith,1852) that enter the Eastern Palearctic.

Please tell me what this Ophion is. Moscow region, August 16.

This is not Ophion, but Enicospilus and, most likely, E. ramidulus L. (the sclerites of the wing are poorly visible)

141-Egypt, Sharm el-Sheikh, Melia Sharm Resort 5*
142-144-Moscow, Bitsevsky Forest Park

142 - Atanycolus sp. (Braconidae)
143 - Ctenopelmatinae (Ichneumonidae)
144 - Ichneumoninae (Ichneumonidae)

Metopius sp.
male.I am now far from home, you can see the fauna of Ukraine Tolkanits, There are few species, so it is easy to determine.

I wouldn't be so presumptuous... Have you defined metopiuses a lot and often? Believe me, their definition is not so simple, given the significant intraspecific variability in both size and color. Even with a copy in your hands, you sometimes have to tinker a lot, and often without a reference collection, you can't be sure of determining 100%, and even more so from photos where the main diagnostic signs are not visible, so you can only guess...

131-136, 139, 140-D. Novelties-Begichevo, Serpukhov district, Moscow region
137, 138 - Moscow, Butovsky forest
Park 131. 13.06.2014

136 - Inostemma sp. (Platygastridae)
138 - Braconidae

Hello! Please help me with hymenoptera.
330crop, 333crop - end of May, Minsk region, Belarus
351crop, 368crop-mid-June, Minsk region, Belarus
373del - beginning of September, Minsk region, Belarus
374crop, 375crop - mid-June, Vitebsk region, Belarus

373 - most likely someone from Ctenopelmatinae (Ichneumonidae)

What kind of rider? At least up to the subfamily. Sevastopol. August. The size is about 15 mm.

Some oddly short wings.. Aren't there any other angles? I would like to see the 1st segment of the abdomen and the venation of the wings.
So far - Ctenopelmatinae is questionable

This post was edited by IchMan - 03/15/2015 16: 25

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. June 6.

Pimplinae, Ephialtini (Ichneumonidae)

111-118 - D. Novelties-Begichevo, Serpukhov district, Moscow region
119-Moscow, Butovsky Forest
Park 120-Vicinity of the village. Gorki-10, Odintsovo district, Moscow region

114 - male of some Ichneumon sp.
117-Gelis areator Panzer or Gelis liparae Giraud (Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae)

121-Neighborhood of the village. Gorki-10, Odintsovo district, Moscow region
122-126 - D. New items-Begichevo, Serpukhov district, Moscow region
127-130-Egypt, Hurghada, Stella Makadi Beach Resort 5*

122-Apparently something from the Cryptinae (Ichneumonidae)

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. May 20.
What can you say about these goosebumps?

Apparently, Lasius (Dendrolasius) fuliginosus (Latreille, 1798)

the last of my possibly Stenodynerus orenburgensis