Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. 14.09.2017.
?Phanerotoma sp. (Ichneumonoidea: Braconidae: Cheloninae)?

Right!

Nizhny Novgorod region 11.09.17.

1.



2. On the water

1. Lasius sp. female.
2. Lasius flavus. the female.

Hello! Please help me with the definition. July 17, Bashkortostan, Kandrykul, together with the colony of Bembeks nosatyi

Pictures:

DSCN0265.JPG — (341.75к)


DSCN0263.JPG — (345.63к)

Hello, I'm from the Ulyanovsk region.

In the forest I came across such a specimen:




The sawfly is slightly larger in size than the large birch one.

Maybe someone has already met such? I can't determine the type in any way.

Hello, I'm from the Ulyanovsk region.

In the forest I came across such a specimen:


The sawfly is slightly larger in size than the large birch one.

Maybe someone has already met such? I can't determine the view.

And this is Cimbex femoratus. (See Verzhutsky's guide to Siberia and the Far East)

Hello! Please help me with the definition. July 17, Bashkortostan, Kandrykul, together with the colony of Bembeks nosatyi

Sphex funerarius

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. 27.09.2017.





This post was edited by Woodmen - 27.09.2017 17: 00

And this is Cimbex femoratus. (You can look it up in Verzhutsky's guide to Siberia and the Far East)

Hmm, the drawing on it is a bit off.

Here's a birch tree:




They have a band not from the beginning of the head capsule, and there are no large dots on the sides.

I have specimens already in the cocoon stage. These large dots did not appear on them. And the band, even in the pupal stage, does not reach the head capsule.

By the way, where can I get acquainted with the determinant?

It has another form - spotted, not at all like the usual one.
The determinant is " B. N. Verzhutsky. Determinant of horntail and sawfly larvae in Siberia and the Far East, 1973 " available in the Flora and Fauna Library

Thank you

Taken on September 6-10 in the Nizhny Novgorod region.

1


2


3


4


5


6

And also please identify from the Nizhny Novgorod region. 10.09.17

7


8


9

3. Polistes dominula
5. Batozonellus lacerticida
9. Sphex funerarius
4. Seladonia sp., but here I'm not sure, is weak in bees.

Ukraine, Rivne region, May 1.
Taxonus agrorum ?



Aglaostigma aucupariae ?




This post was edited by Gans75 - 01.10.2017 13: 01

1-3-Moscow, Bitsevsky forest
Park 4-8-D. New items-Begichevo, Serpukhov district, Moscow region.


1. 19.10.2016, from wood mushroom



2. 13.12.2016, from wood mushroom



3. 09.02.2017, from wood mushroom


4. 29.04.2017



5. 29.04.2017



6. 29.04.2017



7. 30.04.2017



8. 02.05.2017

 
9. Sphex funerarius

Here you have okodemik Podalonia from sfex could not distinguish ))) Despite the fact that the venation is clearly visible, and the residence of the sphex in such parts is also a question)

Here you have okodemik Podalonia from sfex could not distinguish ))) Despite the fact that the venation is clearly visible, and the residence of the sphex in such parts is also a question)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gsdDEbS3CE

Mdya... Well, if this is a sphex, then why don't the veins of the last cubital cell close on the radial one?
Usually the venation in this area of the sphex looks like this )

Then this is also sphex? )

Pictures:

P1011016.jpg — (88.29к)

Did Pan listen to the song on the link? Didn't help? Then to the ophthalmologist the direct road. And if it does not help, then the prognosis is pessimistic: the growth of Maidan in the brain has reached the visual centers. Soon all wasps will look the same: like the EU flag. On the panov photo, of course, I filed it, but purely habitually, without even going into the details of venation (which is not visible in the panov miniature), it is easier to confuse it with an ammophila than with a sphex. Shame on the South Ukrainian meganaturalizld! I didn't expect him to state his level of competence in entomology so clearly.

Well, in general, yes, I forgot that the proportions between the veins flowing into the radial cell are not important, although they also show the difference, which is perfectly noticeable in my photo. So I screwed up with podalonia.
Although generally podalonia are different, of course my sphex is not very similar, but there are species that are quite comparable in size and habit, more than 20 cm in length.

But, after all, something is wrong with this "sphex", I looked at both my pictures and those that are on the network - photos signed as sphex with such a ratio of veins on the radial cell-well, one and all.
And then I read more Talmud, and found out that there is still such a kind of Palmodes

On the photo under the signature Palmodes occitanicus. You can pay attention to the radial cell and the proportions of the veins that are attached to it, and compare it with photo # 9. In general, I'll go read more ))

 
On the photo under the signature Palmodes occitanicus. You can pay attention to the radial cell and the proportions of the veins that are attached to it, and compare it with photo # 9.

Leave the ill-fated radial vein and its "proportions" alone. If you want to learn how to distinguish Ammophilini from Sphecini, then look better where the return veins flow - in one cell or in different ones. More and more sense will be.

Leave the ill-fated radial vein and its "proportions" alone. If you want to learn how to distinguish Ammophilini from Sphecini, then look better where the return veins flow - in one cell or in different ones. More and more sense will be.

I already understood this error, but palmodes (it seems to be the same as isodonta) is not Ammophilini already.
Still, very strange venation in the "sphex" in the primary photo, and palm trees judging by the area in those parts can just be found.

The sphex on the tomegatherion photo has exactly the same venation as the sphex on the photo with a watermark torn out by Pan from the Internet, and different from the venation of palmodes on the photo torn out by him without a watermark (and even more so from padalonia), all the oddities are in pan's brain. Since, as everyone has already understood, pan does not know how to venate from the word "at all", I recommend that he pay attention to such signs as the pubescence of the muzzle of the face and the color of the legs. Although who knows, maybe he's also an achromath.

I already understood this error, but palmodes (it seems to be the same as isodonta) is not Ammophilini already.
Still, very strange venation in the "sphex" in the primary photo, and palm trees judging by the area in those parts can just be found.

Not Ammophilini.
Sphecini.
And the return veins flow into different cells. Unlike Ammophilini

Normal venation in the primary photo. Just like sphex. And it doesn't look like Palmodes at all.

This post was edited by alex 2611-02.10.2017 00: 15

Not Ammophilini.
Sphecini.
And the return veins flow into different cells. Unlike Ammophilini

Normal venation in the primary photo. Just like sphex. And it doesn't look like Palmodes at all.

Everything is right. But I'm not sure about S. funerarius. This specimen has very yellow wings, which suggests S. flavipennis. True, the latter usually has a more golden pubescence of the architrave, but here it is silvery. I don't know if all of these are artifacts.

Everything is right. But I'm not sure about S. funerarius. This specimen has very yellow wings, which suggests S. flavipennis. True, the latter usually has a more golden pubescence of the architrave, but here it is silvery. I don't know if all of these are artifacts.

I have a collection defined as S. flavipennis for some reason, as a rule, larger than S. funerarius.
Nonsense? An accident?

I have a collection defined as S. flavipennis for some reason, as a rule, larger than S. funerarius.
Nonsense? An accident?

No, it is true, S. flavipennis is larger. But from the photo without specifying the dimensions, it is difficult to judge this.

No, it is true, S. flavipennis is larger. But from the photo without specifying the dimensions, it is difficult to judge this.

Yes, it is difficult to judge from the photo. And in the box you can immediately see

Everything is right. But I'm not sure about S. funerarius. This specimen has very yellow wings, which suggests S. flavipennis. True, the latter usually has a more golden pubescence of the architrave, but here it is silvery. I don't know if all of these are artifacts.

Here I have a question about "living in those parts". It seems that it even barely reaches us in latitude. Does the Nizhny Novgorod Region really have one?

Tell me, please, both Cimbex femoratus ? Moscow region.

Pictures:

_1120003.jpg — (334.66к)


DSCN4866.jpg — (489.25к)

Tell me, please, both Cimbex femoratus ? Moscow region.

Cimbex femoratus lower only.
Upper - Trichiosoma sp.

Maybe someone can identify bumblebees?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, Hripan railway platform area, suburban area
July 2017

Pictures:

1_DSC05568.jpg — (501.07к)


2_DSC04064.jpg — (259.73к)


3_DSC02846.jpg — (448.1к)

Surroundings of Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov region. 17.07.2017.

Can I identify this bee?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, vicinity of the railway platform Khripan, dacha plot, on gerani bolotnaya
2017.08.07

Pictures:

DSC03253.jpg — (379.44к)

Can I identify this bee?
Moscow region, Ramenskiy district, vicinity of the railway platform Khripan, dacha plot, on gerani bolotnaya
2017.08.07

Hylaeus sp.
I don't really understand.

Hylaeus sp.
I don't really understand.

Thank you very much-and this is enough for the picture !
There are bumblebees and so no one will dare to determine

Thank you very much-and this is enough for the picture !
There are bumblebees and so no one will dare to determine

Strange actually, like bumblebees many do
I love only single pchel

You have male bumblebees in your photo, colleague. They are reliably determined only by the genitals. Увы.