Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

✖

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164... 854

17.05.2009 14:46, косинус

thank you

17.05.2009 14:56, Victor Titov

Dear Cosine, let me give you one piece of advice: if you prefer not to stick, but to prick beetles, then, first, use entomological pins, and secondly, prick according to the standard-strictly perpendicular to the beetle's body, in the right elytra, while the pin should come out between the middle and rear pair of legs. The pin should not be "pushed through", but rather screwed into the beetle, so that a "break"does not form on its underside.

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 17.05.2009 14: 59

Likes: 2

17.05.2009 15:17, Алексей Сажнев

and it is better not even to pierce, but to stick the beetles on a small die (in size), which is then pierced with a pin, the beetles thus remain intact

Likes: 1

17.05.2009 15:36, Любопытная

Good afternoon!
Help me identify who it is!
Photographed on 3.05, in the Crimea, near the Djur-Djur waterfall .

Pictures:
picture: P10401091.JPG

P10401091.JPG — (51.77к)

17.05.2009 15:46, Алексей Сажнев

the soldier bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus , is not a beetle)))

Likes: 1

17.05.2009 18:11, Liparus

help me determine?Japan

17.05.2009 18:22, Алексей Сажнев

Paroplapoderus pardalis possibility

17.05.2009 19:31, Sungaya

and where can I find lists of water beetles for Mosk? regions?

17.05.2009 19:46, omar

At Pyotr Petrov's. He is the originator of such documents. You can write him a letter, he seems to be in Moscow right now.

Likes: 1

17.05.2009 19:48, Алексей Сажнев

do they exist? in my opinion, the data on water beetles in Moscow are fragmentary and scattered across various publications, maybe I just don't know, try contacting Petya Petrov - http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/rus/ppetrov.htm, and also see some literature on the site of Oleg Brekhov - http://oleg-brechov.narod.ru/liter.html - maybe that will be useful

Likes: 1

17.05.2009 19:53, omar

17.05.2009 19:57, Алексей Сажнев

I would say it is necessary, he is very knowledgeable on vodnikam

17.05.2009 20:00, Sungaya

another question about the name of Dytiscus circumcinctus
In the Jacobson determinant of this species is not, but there is Dytiscus circumeinctus.
Is this it?
And what is the determinant of beetles with more modern names and classification?

17.05.2009 20:24, Fornax13

another question about the name of Dytiscus circumcinctus
In the Jacobson determinant of this species is not, but there is Dytiscus circumeinctus.
Is this it?
And what is the determinant of beetles with more modern names and classification?

In Yakobson ochepyatka.
I think this will come in handy:
http://www.zin.ru/animalia/Coleoptera/rus/hydrkey.htm

Likes: 1

17.05.2009 20:47, BO.

Need help identifying:
Two small beetles of no more than 6 mm.
1. Found no thistle flower
2. Flew into the light. ( Black, Mirrored)
Astrakhan region May.

Pictures:
picture: SG_100566web.jpg

SG_100566web.jpg — (137.69к)

picture: SG_100575web.jpg

SG_100575web.jpg — (73.02к)

17.05.2009 20:54, Bad Den

Need help identifying:
Two small beetles of no more than 6 mm.
1. Found no thistle flower

In my opinion, some grinder (Anobiidae)

17.05.2009 21:24, omar

The upper ones are precisely grinders, and the lower one is a leaf beetle from the genus Luperus

17.05.2009 21:26, Fornax13

1-Lasioderma obscurum most likely
2-Luperus some kind of prost

Likes: 1

17.05.2009 22:35, Алексей Сажнев

not luperus graecus female?

17.05.2009 22:47, Fornax13

Why graecus?

Likes: 1

18.05.2009 4:57, VSB

This beetle is no more than 8 mm in size, somewhat reminded me of a soft-bodied beetle, but it is difficult to determine exactly. I will be grateful for your help.

18.05.2009 5:45, BO.

[quote ] This beetle is no more than 8 mm in size, somewhat reminded me of a soft-bodied beetle, but it is difficult to determine exactly. I will be grateful for your help.
[/quote]
I also have such a thing, some kind of Baby, I would like to define it before the appearance.

The post was edited by BO. - 18.05.2009 05:49

18.05.2009 5:47, Borka

This is Malachius Malachius (probably bipustulatus)

Likes: 1

18.05.2009 8:08, Алексей Сажнев

Malachius assimilis male

Likes: 2

18.05.2009 10:53, Liparus

Help with trubkoverty,put down the numbers (maybe someone has already sorted it out)

Apoderini
Apoderus (Apoderus) jekelii Roelofs,1874
Apoderus (Leptapoderus) praecellens Sharp,1889
Apoderus (Leptapoderus) balteatus Roelofs,1874
Apoderus (Leptapoderus) rubidus Motschulsky,1860
Apoderus (Compsapoderus) erythrogaster Snellen van Vollenhoven,1865
Apoderus (Compsapoderus) genimus Sharp,1889
Phymatapoderus pavens Voss, 1926
Phymatapoderus subornatus (Sharp,1889)
Trachelophorini
Cycnotrachelus roelofsi (Harold,1877)
Centrocorynus (Physapoderus) nigricollis (Roelofs,1874)
Paratracelophorus longicornis (Roelofs,1874)
?Paratracelophorus fluvus (Roelofs,1874)

http://www.d1.dion.ne.jp/~k_izawa/atte/apr.htm

18.05.2009 17:12, akulich-sibiria

good evening. I've got a couple of beetles here.
1. What do I think is Necrobia violacea? it was found on a young pine tree. май
picture: PB060166_.jpg

2. this is something from the Rhizophagidae or Nitidulidae I do not know what family they belong to...
sort of like how Rhizophagus can dapressus..It was found in a fairly large number of Tomicus minor and T. piniperda passages in a pine tree.
picture: PB050156_.jpg

18.05.2009 17:22, Fornax13

1-Yes, I would also say so...
2-Judging by the mustache, really some kind of Rhizophagus (like Monotomidae now the family should be called)

Likes: 1

18.05.2009 17:51, akulich-sibiria

thank you again. For a long time something was not visible on the forum.
why do Rhizophagus talk so much about different families?...well, I think the view is correct, because I went to the genus almost from the pictures and it was the structure of the antennae.

Likes: 1

18.05.2009 21:49, Дзанат

thank you again. For a long time something was not visible on the forum.
why do Rhizophagus talk so much about different families?..........

I'm sorry

, I haven't laughed like this in a long time.

18.05.2009 23:29, Fornax13

thank you again. For a long time something was not visible on the forum.
why do Rhizophagus talk so much about different families?...well, I think the view is correct, because I went to the genus almost from the pictures and it was the structure of the antennae.

Nenenenene, rhizophagus seriously need to drive on the keys. There are not so few types of them.

19.05.2009 10:47, VSB

This beetle, filmed in Chelyabinsk, I identified as Cantharis fusca-Soft-bodied dark (brown), right?

Pictures:
picture: __________.jpg

__________.jpg — (134.93к)

19.05.2009 10:49, Bad Den

VSB, similar to

Likes: 1

19.05.2009 11:28, akulich-sibiria

I'm sorry, I haven't laughed like this in a long time.

Well, I'm very glad that I made you happy Katya!!

...It's just that I can't see the number of segments of my legs at all, and since there is such a confusion in the families, I couldn't get out to the family. I had to go to the genus according to the drawings of the structure of the antennae. As it turns out, I'm going to be a Sherlock Holmes.

. So here and there already on the determinant of predator beetles came out on the view. Well, there is no doubt about it by gender. it was just described that this species lives in the passages of sapwood.
Katya, so what about glabratus, can it be him or not??

19.05.2009 14:44, Алексей Сажнев

Help with trubkoverty,put down the numbers (maybe someone has already sorted it out)

and what is the problem, like they are all signed on the site
Apoderini is for the second photo, and Trachelophorini is for the first

19.05.2009 18:52, bials

Help with a new bug catch.

Taken the day before in the Moscow region, Odintsovo district.
1. picture: ___________1_____________.jpg

This one is similar to Cytilus sericeus, but noticeably larger.
2a. picture: ____1.1_____________.jpg

2b.

some kind of staphylin
3. picture: ______________1.2_____________.jpg

This post was edited by bials-19.05.2009 18: 53

19.05.2009 18:57, Алексей Сажнев

Dead
eater Thanatophilus terminatus (Hummel, 1825)
Oiceoptoma thoracicum (Linnaeus, 1758)

19.05.2009 18:58, Fornax13

1-Cleonis pigra or something...
2-Byrrhus pilula most likely
3-Ontholestes tesselatus
4-Thanatophilus sinuatus, female
5-Oiceoptoma thoracicum

This post was edited by Fornax13-19.05.2009 19: 04

Likes: 2

19.05.2009 19:05, Алексей Сажнев

yes I apologize for the early post - it really is a female Thanatophilus sinuatus

19.05.2009 19:09, omar

Isn't there an angle for the elephant from above?

19.05.2009 20:10, KingSnake

What kind of bug can you tell me?

Pictures:
picture: P1090313.jpg

P1090313.jpg — (131.12к)

Pages: 1 ...156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

24.11.2024: «Поиск энтомологов» работает в полном объеме!
24.11.2024: We fixed an error in displaying the website in the "gray" color scheme
17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».