E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of Diptera (flies, mosquitoes, etc.)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of Diptera (flies, mosquitoes, etc.)

Pages: 1 ...12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20... 98

26.11.2008 12:43, Nikita V

Moscow and the region

21
user posted image

22
user posted image

23
user posted image

24 (Chrysotoxum bicinctum?)
user posted image

25
user posted image

26 Sphaerophoria?
user posted image

27 Sphaerophoria?
user posted image

28
user posted image

29
user posted image

30
user posted image


22 - Graphomya maculata, Muscidae
25 - Sylvicola sp., Anisopodidae
Likes: 1

26.11.2008 12:47, Nikita V

I apologize for interrupting the experts ' conversation smile.gif.
If I got there, could you tell me what kind of bird it is? She was running on the tundra and I think she wanted to crawl on me shuffle.gif
[attachmentid()=52169]


It is indeed Hippoboscidae, but not Lipoptena cervi
Likes: 1

26.11.2008 13:02, алекс 2611

81 Protophormia terraenovae (Robineau-Desvoidy 1830)
88 Suillia sp., Heleomyzidae
89 Chloropidae sp.


Thanks for the definition. Interesting. If you know anything about flies, please identify old photos of flies...
Likes: 1

26.11.2008 17:01, IchMan

to NakaRB
83 - not a midge, but a fungal mosquito (family Mycetophilidae)
87-sort of like Stratiomyiidae, if not confused from memory in these i-y
30-like really Sepsidae
Likes: 2

26.11.2008 17:33, NakaRB

Thanks for the definition. Interesting. If you know anything about flies, please identify old photos of flies...

I join the request smile.gif

27.11.2008 10:10, алекс 2611

 
87-kind of like Stratiomyiidae, if you don't get confused from memory in these i-y
30-like really Sepsidae


87 I also can't seem to write the Latin name of the family correctly from memory. In general, lvinki. It resembles Chloromyia formosa. I just don't know if this species is found in the Moscow region or not. I fished farther south.

30 exactly Sepsidae
Likes: 1

27.11.2008 19:50, NakaRB

The penultimate batch. Moscow and the region

91-Rhingia sp. , but it is not possible to reach the species...
user posted image
user posted image

92 - Melanostoma sp.?
user posted image

93
user posted image

94
user posted image

95 - Tephritidae
user posted image

96
user posted image

97
user posted image

98
user posted image

99
user posted image

100
user posted image

06.12.2008 16:28, amateur

It is indeed Hippoboscidae, but not Lipoptena cervi

And lipoptena is not the only one in the genus? Do you remember something from school that the reindeer bloodsucker seems to have been brought to Europe from the Far East? Or is it not true?

11.12.2008 19:14, Трофим

(№ 1)
Who can it be?
15.05.2008 On the edge of the forest-sitting on a bush.

Pictures:
picture: 1.JPG
1.JPG — (140.16 k)

14.12.2008 23:28, Александрс

There are five sirfidok. Some are taken from different locations. If the quality allows, then maybe someone will be able to identify them. All from Kharkiv. Thanks!
Of course sIrfidok! Already fixed it, thanks!

This post was edited by Alexandrs - 15.12.2008 04: 13

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (94.7 k)

picture: 2.jpg
2.jpg — (82.6 k)

picture: 2a.jpg
2a.jpg — (141.56к)

picture: 3.jpg
3.jpg — (63.86к)

picture: 3a.jpg
3a.jpg — (124.7 k)

picture: 3b.jpg
3b.jpg — (54.48 k)

picture: 3c.jpg
3c.jpg — (135.28к)

picture: 4.jpg
4.jpg — (50.89 k)

picture: 4a.jpg
4a.jpg — (74.71к)

picture: 4b.jpg
4b.jpg — (81.22 k)

picture: 4c.jpg
4c.jpg — (87.07 k)

picture: 5.jpg
5.jpg — (70.82 k)

picture: 5a.jpg
5a.jpg — (66.93к)

15.12.2008 1:22, алекс 2611

There are five surfboards. Some are taken from different locations. If the quality allows, then maybe someone will be able to identify them. All from Kharkiv. Thanks!


4, 4a-c female, 5 male Xanthogramma pedissequum (Harris, 1776)

2, 2a-male, 3, 3a-c female Chrysotoxum festuvum (Linnaeus, 1758)

1 Chrysotoxum


and yet - not" serfidok", but sirfidok
Likes: 1

15.12.2008 1:31, алекс 2611

The penultimate batch. Moscow and the region

91-Rhingia sp. , but it is not possible to reach the species...



Rhingia rostrata (Linnaeus, 1758) ?
Likes: 1

15.12.2008 4:22, Александрс

 

1 Chrysotoxum


Thanks! Can I look for a different angle #1 to determine up to the view? Or won't it help?

15.12.2008 13:04, алекс 2611

Thanks! Can I look for a different angle #1 to determine up to the view? Or won't it help?



If you have any, please send us other photos. I will try to make my own assumptions about the type. But keep in mind - these will be assumptions, and the assumptions of an amateur who does not have a biological education.

16.12.2008 23:06, Александрс

With your permission, two more Kharkiv Syrphidae. One, unfortunately, only from below... Can be defined?

Pictures:
picture: 001.jpg
001.jpg — (153.61 k)

picture: 002.jpg
002.jpg — (131.03к)

picture: 002a.jpg
002a.jpg — (147.89к)

17.12.2008 11:17, алекс 2611

With your permission, two more Kharkiv Syrphidae. One, unfortunately, only from below... Can be defined?

2 and 2a probably Scaeva pyrastri (Linnaeus, 1758)
1 Chrysotoxum to the species I do not dare - I have very small collections for this genus and I did not really understand it
Likes: 1

17.12.2008 11:30, алекс 2611

The penultimate batch. Moscow and the region


92-Melanostoma sp.? - I would say " yes "
93 and 100 Lucillia, and 100 I would venture to call Lucillia caesar L.
94-and this is not by chance Merodon, the family of sirphids?
95 and 98 look familiar, I'll get to the box one of these days and try to say something.
Likes: 1

17.12.2008 13:25, gumenuk

Is it Muscidae?
Ramenskiy district, Moscow region, May 23

Pictures:
picture: 6561.jpg
6561.jpg — (117.05к)

17.12.2008 14:25, Александрс


1 Chrysotoxum to the species I do not dare - I have very small fees for this genus and I did not really understand it



Thank you very much! I looked at the archives for August. This Chrysotoxum judging by the date of shooting (in one day 27.08.08.) the same as the top view you defined before the Chrysotoxum genus earlier... (#1 and # 001) I don't know if this will help...

This post was edited by Alexandrs - 12/17/2008 18: 45

18.12.2008 19:17, vep

(№ 1)
Who can it be?
15.05.2008 On the edge of the forest-sitting on a bush.

Tanyptera atrata Mg. - Tipulidae

18.12.2008 19:26, vep

[quote=NakaRB,27.11.2008 19:50]
Likes: 1

18.12.2008 23:42, NakaRB

22.12.2008 22:38, Pirx


94-and this is not by any chance Merodon, a family of sirfids?


Alexey, to the point wink.gifMerodon equestris Fabricius.

23.12.2008 23:09, алекс 2611

Alexey, to the point wink.gifMerodon equestris Fabricius.


"So that's what you are, a reindeer" (c)

23.12.2008 23:15, алекс 2611

Alexey, to the point wink.gifMerodon equestris Fabricius.


But seriously, I need to get more involved with the sirfids - that's my thing. I don't really care about big tropical butterflies, barbels, or ground beetles. Nafig I don't need them. And I will see some sirfidu from the genus Cheilosia and the heart freezes.

27.12.2008 13:40, Pirx

But seriously, I need to get more involved with the sirfids - that's my thing. I don't really care about big tropical butterflies, barbels, or ground beetles. Nafig I don't need them. And I will see some sirfidu from the genus Cheilosia and the heart freezes.


beer.gif

27.12.2008 18:38, Liparus

The penultimate batch. Moscow and the region


96



96 - Syrphus vitrippennis (Mg.)

27.12.2008 18:39, Liparus

With your permission, two more Kharkiv Syrphidae. One, unfortunately, only from below... Can be defined?


2,2а - Seaeva pyrastri (L.)

27.12.2008 18:41, Liparus

There are five sirfidok. Some are taken from different locations. If the quality allows, then maybe someone will be able to identify them. All from Kharkiv. Thanks!
Of course sIrfidok! Already fixed it, thanks!


4,4а,4в,4с,5,5а - Xanthogramma paidisequum (Harris).

27.12.2008 20:14, Liparus

There are five sirfidok. Some are taken from different locations. If the quality allows, then maybe someone will be able to identify them. All from Kharkiv. Thanks!
Of course sIrfidok! Already fixed it, thanks!


1 -Chrysotoxum octomaculatum (Cyrtis)
3,3а,3в,3с- Chrysotoxum festivum (L.)

28.12.2008 22:07, алекс 2611

4,4а,4в,4с,5,5а - Xanthogramma paidisequum (Harris).


pedissequum (Harris, 1776)

28.12.2008 22:19, алекс 2611

96 - Syrphus vitrippennis (Mg.)


Sorry for the quibbles, but Syrphus vitripennis Mg is more correct.
And the definition is correct for my taste.
Likes: 1

16.01.2009 0:52, Dr. Niko

Is it possible to determine the predator and prey before the genus-species?
It would be interesting.

Pictures:
picture: P1020849.jpg
P1020849.jpg — (349.41к)

24.01.2009 22:31, Михаил Николаенко

Is it possible to determine the predator and prey before the genus-species?
It would be interesting.


It seems to be Scathophaga stercoraria.
Likes: 1

24.01.2009 22:45, Михаил Николаенко

Tell me, please, what kind of flies are these? Both were shot near Moscow. 1-I on July 14, the second-on July 18. About the second one, I thought it was a horsefly, but a horsefly drinks blood, not nectar. confused.gif
Thanks!

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (99.2к)

24.01.2009 23:13, Victor Titov

Tell me, please, what kind of flies are these? Both were shot near Moscow. 1-I on July 14, the second-on July 18. About the second one, I thought it was a horsefly, but a horsefly drinks blood, not nectar. confused.gif
Thanks!

The first is the Conops sp heavy head.
And the second one is a horsefly, a male. He does not eat blood, unlike females smile.gif http://zooex.baikal.ru/diptera/tabanidae.htm

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 24.01.2009 23: 16
Likes: 1

24.01.2009 23:42, алекс 2611

Tell me, please, what kind of flies are these? Both were shot near Moscow. 1-I on July 14, the second-on July 18. About the second one, I thought it was a horsefly, but a horsefly drinks blood, not nectar. confused.gif
Thanks!


The second, as Dmitrich quite correctly said, is a male horsefly. As far as I understand,
I don't agree with the first fly from the genus Atylotus. This is not Conops. Most likely it is a representative of the genus Physocephala, family Conopidae
Likes: 2

24.01.2009 23:53, Михаил Николаенко

The second, as Dmitrich quite correctly said, is a male horsefly. As far as I understand,
I don't agree with the first fly from the genus Atylotus. This is not Conops. Most likely it is a representative of the genus Physocephala, family Conopidae


I think I found what kind of fly it is - Physocephala rufipes.
Thanks!!!

25.01.2009 11:22, алекс 2611

I think I found what kind of fly it is - Physocephala rufipes.
Thanks!!!


I have almost no material on this kind, but I have doubts about rufipes. Like in rufipes, the thighs are usually completely reddish-yellow, but here most of the thigh is black.
Likes: 1

25.01.2009 12:35, barry

I have almost no material on this kind, but I have doubts about rufipes. Like in rufipes, the thighs are usually completely reddish-yellow, but here most of the thigh is black.

It looks like the keys are here...
http://home.hccnet.nl/mp.van.veen/conopida...hala.html#item3
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20... 98

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.