E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

The need for entering forms, aberrations and other types of variability of species if they are clearly marked signs and scientific names.

Community and Forum → Discussions on the website functionality → The need for entering forms, aberrations and other types of variability of species if they are clearly marked signs and scientific names.

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 06.09.2014 22:20

In fact: according to some sources is now canceled aberration and form types and offers to do without them. In my opinion, in spite of this they must be all the same point.
How do you feel about that? And it is interesting actually, something to read, "where the shoe pinches" at this cancellation and the reasonably. Maybe something I do not understand?

Comments

06.09.2014 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov

If I'm not mistaken, it's from the Code of Zoological Nomenclature, but not canceled, and from what the year is not recommended, give names below subspecies, ie, shape, aberration and others. Name By According to this year can be used.

06.09.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, thank you, and you can credit you can ask for? Or the date?
Although I does not really matter as most forms and aberrations had called more with the king-peas.

06.09.2014 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil, I'm on the memory, but it is written in the code, you just have to look for it, I have now do not have it handy.

06.09.2014 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Look at your leisure and then write here, to know. I think it is very important to ensure that the procedure with this case it was.

18.05.2016 6:47, Ivan Pristrem

It is necessary to specify. But only so that, if anything, a link from a photo of this subspecies / forms / aberrations led to the page of the form, and not in the empty space, like we have here often happened and happens still.

18.05.2016 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov

No need for any links: the question is, is-whether it is specified in the top line :)
I believe that it is necessary to specify if it is possible.
Shape, aberration variations etc. They are not tasonomicheskimi units. It's just a deviation from the template.
The example of the same conventional Trichius fasciatus can not do without their guidance in any way.

Examples of how this should be indicated:
aberrations:
https://insecta.pro/gallery/22814
https://insecta.pro/gallery/49878
Variation:
https://insecta.pro/gallery/46425
Form (seasonal):
https://insecta.pro/gallery/2911

18.05.2016 11:34, Yuri Semejkin

.- Vasiliy Feoktistov, 09/06/2014 22:20
How do you feel about that? ...... I for the fact that if all ukazyvat.gde tselesoobrazno.Dazhe formally renounced.

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.