E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Russian name Hemiptera

Community and ForumTaxonomy. ClassificationRussian name Hemiptera

Mistes, 09.01.2013 11:31

I apologize to the experienced forumchan-I'm a botanist, not an entomologist. However, recently I came across a discrepancy in entomological nomenclature, which turned out to be incomprehensible to me.
For bedbugs, cicadas, etc., the Latin name of the order Hemiptera is accepted. It has always been translated as "Hemiptera" or even "Bedbugs" (which is hardly justified), in particular, in the six-volume "Animal Life" and other publications that can hardly be considered unscientific. However, in the Russian version of this name here (Wikipedia: Hemiptera), in the discussion of the page, the name "Arthropodobotes", unknown to me, was indicated. And in rather harsh terms, with the statement that the page should be completely rewritten. I must say right away that I didn't create it on Wikipedia. smile.gif However, for scientific work, I need to use the correct, valid name of the squad. Tell me, please, how, after all, it will be competent to designate it!

This post was edited by Dracus - 28.01.2013 14: 40

Comments

09.01.2013 12:27, Лавр Большаков

Dear Mistes, Wikipedia is not a source of reliable scientific knowledge about insects. There often write articles of individuals who have not been realized on the scientific front. I am not an expert on proboscids, but once I arrived in time, and even more recently, I also encountered a similar problem when writing the Introduction to the Kr. book section, I will try to explain.
For the designation of the order hemiptera (=bugs), the name Heteroptera is now usually used. And the cicadas (as well as aphids, leafhoppers, coccids (=worms and scabies) usually belong to the order Homoptera. There are points of view that all this is one large order of proboscids, for which the name Hemiptera s.l. (i.e. in a broad sense) is accepted. But the same name in a narrow sense (Hemiptera s.str.) was previously applied to bedbugs. Hence some confusion. I do not know about the name "Arthropods". If necessary, I use the names "Hemiptera (Heteroptera)" and " Equidistant wings (Homoptera)" like squads. According to this logic, the name Hemiptera s. l. should already be attributed to the superorder proboscis.
Maybe experts on them will come in time to correct something.

09.01.2013 12:42, amara

I think "Hemiptera" would be best. The fact is that before bedbugs were a separate unit from cicadas, but now they are in the same unit in which there are already 4 sub-orders, so you should not call the unit Bedbugs.

And I don't know where the word "arthropodobota" came from (Google reduced the search to one source, from the Russian Wikipedia, this was copied to a couple of other places).
I am waiting with interest for what the experts will say.

09.01.2013 13:15, Mistes

Thank you. I came to about the same conclusion. Calling the entire order Hemiptera bedbugs, of course, is already incorrect, since the suborder Heteroptera is indicated everywhere on foreign sites...
I don't think Wikipedia is a scientific source by any means, but sometimes I check with it for generally accepted names when I'm too lazy to get definitions, etc. It's just that this time it was precisely what caught my eye was such a strange discrepancy.
As for Equidoptera, unfortunately, this taxon is considered obsolete on foreign systematic sites due to the opinion that it is paraphyletic... However, thank you for your help. If you have a dis. If you have any questions about this, at least I'll know what to say. smile.gif

09.01.2013 13:43, Hierophis

In order to get results related to scientific articles in Google, you need to search through Google Academy. There, according to the word arthropods, in contrast to the usual Google, there is a single, but quite kind of scientific article, or rather a manual, but with an indication of authorship, namely this one
http://window.edu.ru/resource/008/66008

That's all smile.gif

This post was edited by Hierophis-09.01.2013 13: 58

09.01.2013 14:23, Mistes

Thanks! smile.gif

09.01.2013 14:44, Hierophis

Here it is necessary to really clarify the practitioners, the name arthropod is associated with Lat. Rhynchota, in different Wikipedia, Rhynchota is synonymous with Hemiptera, then vice versa.
The Academy has a lot of links to modern English-language articles using the squad name-Rhynchota.

09.01.2013 19:58, Лавр Большаков

I think "Hemiptera" would be best.

If all this is considered as one order (which is far from generally accepted and debatable, since I have found a number of modern scientific journals, and everywhere I see only the epithets Heteroptera and Homoptera, but not Hemiptera), then this is incorrect, since hemiptera=bedbugs is quite unambiguous. In Russian literature, but not very new, the name "proboscis"was found in relation to this group. And the fact that they are " segmented..."- some kind of neoplasm, probably in order to distinguish them from the proboscis in the class of mleks. But as you know, homonymy does not apply to Russian and national names in general, so it is better to use the traditional epithet "proboscis" or, if possible, to say about more specific groups.

09.01.2013 20:02, Mistes

Understood. This simplifies the approach a bit. Then let it "go back to the old way, just like my mother put it."
It turns out that the old taxonomic scheme with equal-winged proboscids and bedbugs has not yet outlived its usefulness? In Russian entomology, is there a single scheme now adopted, or is it "everyone is self-determined", who is in the old way, who is in the new way?
In terms of botany, everything is clear, there are the works of A. L. Takhtajyan, which everyone focuses on (despite the existence of foreign APG systems), mostly. But in entomology, everything is somehow incomprehensible to me. smile.gif

This post was edited by Mistes-09.01.2013 20: 07

09.01.2013 20:14, Лавр Большаков

[quote=Hierophis,09.01.2013 14:43]

09.01.2013 20:33, Лавр Большаков

But in entomology, everything is somehow incomprehensible to me. smile.gif

Yes, there is still a lot of discussion about entomological macrosystems, but it also depends on the units. For example, if we take the largest order of Coleoptera (Coleoptera), then they are somehow less discussed and more listened to by authorities, but for Lepidoptera (Lepidoptera) - very much, in the absence of equally generally accepted authorities. And not always the seemingly "friendly" interpretations of English-language cladists with their tendency to "formalize" and simplify systems are supported by our taxonomists

09.01.2013 20:45, Dmitrii Musolin

Not the easiest question... Oddly enough, there is a difference in domestic and foreign reports.

In domestic media, they have recently been writing more often:
order Heteroptera - Hemiptera, or beetles (for example, Vinokurov NN, etc. Catalog.... 2010)

In foreign countries:
suborder Heteroptera of the order Hemiptera (Catalog of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region, 1995; Henry, 2009).

I usually write simply "Heteroptera" or "Hemiptera: Heteroptera". Or, if necessary, with the Russian name: "Hemiptera, or bedbugs (Heteroptera)". If YOU NEED to specify the status, then: "suborder Hemiptera, or bedbugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera)".

If you really need a Wiki, then you need to look in English. : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemiptera
Likes: 1

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.