Forum users' publications

Thank you, Stanislav Yes, Ulf, the other day.

Mmm... Did you ask him, or was it his initiative?

I asked him how things were going with the new number, and he sent me the PDF a few days later.

Ohhh. You should also ask. My notes should also be there

Well, let's start actively using the new trends of the Code.

Congratulations! The dream of many is to own a magazine.

Congratulations! Many people dream of having their own magazine.

Not with anything. Now everyone can afford it.
The minimum print run under the Code is 25 pieces. Secure registration in zoobank - like two fingers on the asphalt. God only knows what will happen next. During the registration of these two articles, my zoobank crashed 1 time (errors in the database). As the number of users increases, it will fall more often. I think the issue of platform reliability will soon arise. Early they, in general, started it all.

The question of a "small private magazine" has already been repeatedly raised in a variety of ways. The main problem is the content. Where to get the required number of good publications.

Regarding the article about NN butterflies, I can add the following species (I saw them right in front of my house):
Carterocephalus palaemon (Pallas, 1771)
Carterocephalus silvicola (Meigen, 1829)
Ochlodes sylvanus (Esper, 1777)

Speyeria aglaja (Linnaeus, 1758)
Nymphalis xanthomelas (Esper, 1781)
Melitaea cinxia (Linnaeus, 1758)
Mellicta athalia (Rottemburg, 1775)

Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus, 1761)
Lycaena alciphron (Rottemburg, 1775)
Lycaena tityrus (Poda, 1761)
Lycaena hippothoe (Linnaeus, 1761)
Satyrium pruni (Linnaeus, 1758)

The question of a "small private magazine" has already been repeatedly raised in a variety of ways. The main problem is the content. Where to get the required number of good publications.

Solved by the publication's irregularity. There is material - published. No , it won't wear out. In this regard, a good example is The Far Eastern Entomologist

Well, let's start actively using the new trends of the Code.

Are English-language entries accepted? Do you have any reviews?

Are English-language entries accepted? Do you have any reviews?

I'm just trying it out for now . I'm not going to actively use it myself. I'll wait at least a year to see what the Commission thinks. I think they'll take it all away. Since it works very poorly in its current form. I started registering my work - on the 12th, the database hung up tightly. For an hour and a half, my request hung and only then fell off after a timeout. In short, while all this system tested by people far from computers is very raw and buggy. There are only a little more than 150,000 entries in the database, and such glitches are already there. And what happens when there are millions of records?

no, why so?
you go around asking everyone who has something.
either there is no time, or data
as soon as it is printed, it turns out that everyone has everything
I thought in the Bottom not so
everywhere the same

It's just that no one asked. I'm surprised myself!

For "bear keepers".

File/s:



 Arctia_turbans.pdf

size: 2.27 mb
number of downloads: 842

Pekarsky O (2012) A new species of Schrankia Hubner, 1825 from China (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Hypenodinae). ZooKeys 242: 43–50. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.242.3856



 Pekarsky_2012_Schrankia_pelicano.pdf

size: 1.78 mb
number of downloads: 693

I would like to inform you about my work published in 2012.

The first of them is an overview of insect responses to modern climate change, which has been published (and is available) in Russian and English.

The second is a review of what is known about diapause in the shield beetle Nezara viridula (including due to climate warming). It is available at the given link.

The third is a short article about how the voltinism of insects can change under the conditions of modern climate change. Also available on request.

Finally, I will be happy to share the issue of Izvestia of the St. Petersburg Forestry Engineering Academy, which is fully dedicated to the Fifth Readings in memory of Oleg Aleksandrovich Kataev and the All-Russian Conference " Diseases and Pests in the Forests of Russia: century XXI" (2011).

Details:

(1)
Musolin D. L., Saulich A. Kh., 2012. Insect responses to modern climate change: from physiology and behavior to shifting habitats. Entomological Review, vol. 91 (1): 3-35.
[Translated into English by Musolin D. L. & Saulich A.Kh., 2012. Responses of insects to the current climate changes: from physiology and behavior to range shifts. Entomological Review. 2012. Vol. 92 (7): 715–740. <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0013873812070019>]

(2)
Musolin D.L., 2012. Surviving winter: diapause syndrome in the southern green stink bug Nezara viridula in the laboratory, in the field, and under climate change conditions. Physiological Entomology. Vol. 37 (4): 309– 322. [ DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2012.00846.x]
< http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111....x/abstract>

(3)
Musolin D. L., Saulich A. Kh., 2012. Voltinism of insects in the context of modern climate change. Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Forestry Engineering Academy. Saint Petersburg, issue 200: 208-221.

(4)
Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Forestry Engineering Academy. Saint Petersburg, Issue 200 (Proceedings of the V Readings in Memory of O. A. Kataev) (edited by D. L. Musolin, Yu. N. Baranchikov, V. I. Ponomarev). St. Petersburg: SPbGLTU Publ., 2012, 310 p. (in Russian) [pdf: 9,1 Mb] -- The PDF file of the collection will be posted on the SPbGLTU website, but for now it is available at the link: http://file.karelia.ru/f3qvfd/

Krupitsky A. V., Yakovlev R. V. 2012. Description of a new subspecies of Callophrys suaveola (Staudinger, 1881) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) from Mongolian Altai with notes on a distribution of C. suaveola // Сaucasian Entomological Bulletin. Vol. 8 (2). P. 261 - 263.



 Krupitsky._Yakovlev_Cauc_Ent_Bull_8_2_.pdf

size: 765.98 k
number of downloads: 920

Zatakovoy A.A., Korb S.K. 2012. Syngrapha ain (Hochenwarth, 1785) newly recorded from the central part of eastern Europe (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, Plusiinae) // Entomologist's Gazette. Vol. 63. P. 239 - 240.

And since when is Syngrapha ain in the family Erebidae?

Since the introduction of the noctuoid lepidopteran system based on molecular features in Europe.

In general, I'll tell you one smart thing... But don't be offended . Editors of Western magazines often change their titles to suit the latest and trendiest trends, and they don't care about the author's opinion. And some even do this with texts. It was from there that we developed taxa such as Heliconiinae in collaboration with Yakovlev and Perunov on the butterflies of the Altai Territory.)

Where did you escape from?!! Metalloids have never been in the Erebidae!

New article: A. M. Shapovalov. A new species of the subgenus Eurymeloe Reitter, 1911 (Coleoptera, Meloidae: Meloe) from the steppe zone of Russia and Kazakhstan.
A.M. Shapovalov. A new species of the subgenus Eurymeloe Reitter, 1911
(Coleoptera, Meloidae: Meloe) from the steppe zone of Russia
and Kazakhstan.

File/s:



 Shapovalov__2012._Cauc._ent._bull._8_2_.pdf

size: 481.35 k
number of downloads: 711

2 new articles

File/s:



 513_516_Yakovlev.pdf

size: 7.19 mb
number of downloads: 830









 10_Khramov_Yakovlev__1_.pdf

size: 1.34 mb
number of downloads: 822

Our new article on the taxonomy of Callophrys.

There is no more of it here, who needs it-write in the personal account

This post was edited by lepidopterolog-03/05/2013 14: 59

In fact, ZOOTAXA prohibits sharing articles (unless they are open access). You signed the contract

In fact, ZOOTAXA prohibits sharing articles (unless they are open access). You signed the contract

Yes, who reads these contracts before signing???!!! They'll write all sorts of nonsense in small print - you'll break your eyes!!!

Yes, they will still hack sci-hub, who will need it

But anyway, sci-hub will be hacked, who will need to

It's one thing to be hacked by someone, but it's another thing not to execute the contract yourself.

Our new article on the taxonomy of Callophrys.

I apologize, but where is the image of the genitals of the holotype in the article? Have they been investigated? And one more question. The table shows photos of the genitalia of paratypes, but which ones? There are several of them in the standard series, how to understand which particular instance the images of genitals given in the article belong to?

I apologize, but where is the image of the genitals of the holotype in the article? Have they been investigated? And one more question. The table shows photos of the genitalia of paratypes, but which ones? There are several of them in the standard series, how to understand which particular instance the images of genitals given in the article belong to?

The genitals of the holotype were not examined, as for the signatures to the genitals of the paratypes, we did not assign ordinal numbers to the specimens/genitals, this is an omission, I agree.

The genitals of the holotype were not examined, as for the signatures to the genitals of the paratypes, we did not assign ordinal numbers to the specimens/genitals, this is an omission, I agree.

I honestly don't know what to say. The description of a new species without studying the genitals of the holotype looks bad. Well, the rules in Zootaxa.

I honestly don't know what to say. The description of a new species without studying the genitals of the holotype looks bad. Well, the rules in Zootaxa.

You may be right, but I don't see the point in gutting the holotype in this case, when its conspecificity to paratypes is not in doubt, besides, a series of genitalia has been studied and the boundaries of their variability are shown, it would be fine if we described the species in 1-2 copies. I am deleting the article, since the violation of the Zootaxa rules caused such a response)

This post was edited by lepidopterolog-03/05/2013 14: 57

You may be right, but I don't see the point in gutting the holotype in this case, when its conspecificity to paratypes is not in doubt, besides, a series of genitalia has been studied and the boundaries of their variability are shown, it would be fine if we described the species in 1-2 copies. I am deleting the article, since the violation of the Zootaxa rules caused such a response)

That's why it's a holotype, so that the description of a new species is made exactly according to it. It is its structure that should be described. Why then was it invented

That's why it's a holotype, so that the description of a new species is made exactly according to it. It is its structure that should be described. Then why did they invent it

Formally, I can't disagree of course

Technically, I can't disagree.

And if so, then formally without the genitalia of the holotype, your new taxon seems to be questionable. I have no doubt that it's a good one after all, but formally ...

It is described, however, entirely within the framework of the Code

It is described, however, entirely within the framework of the Code

Anatoly, we understand each other and we don't need to develop this topic any more. Although I will give another reason to gut the holotypes - there will be no need to respond to comments like mine

Oleg, in any case, thank you for your comments

Published in the current year:

Korb S. K. 2013. Gegenes nostrodamus (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), first record for East Kazakhstan // Phegea 41(1): 22.

Korb S. K. 2013. Diurnal butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoformes) Northern Tien Shan. Part 2. Families of Nymphalidae, Riodinidae, and Lycaenidae / / Eversmannia. Otd. issue 4. 74 p.

Korb S.K. 2013. The name ‡Rueckbeilia is unpublished, unavailable and invalid for nomenclatural purposes presently, and it is an example of incorrect usage of the new Code Amendments especially by publisher and in online resources // Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo. N.F. Bd. 33, H. 4. S. 167 - 168

Korb S.K. 2013. A new subspecies of Alucita kosterini Ustjuzhanin, 1999 (Lepidoptera: Alucitidae) from the Turkestansky mountain ridge, Tajikistan // Entomologist's Gazette. Vol. 64. P. 55 - 60

Korb S. K. 2013. Subspecies structure of Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) / / Eversmannia. Issue 33, pp. 5-9

Korb S. K. 2013. New taxa of satyrids from Central Asia (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) / / Eversmannia. Issue 33, pp. 10-16

Korb S. K. 2013. Clarification of data on the Far Eastern representatives of the genus Hesperia Fabricius, 1793 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) / / Eversmannia. Issue 33, pp. 3-4.

The full list of my publications is available here: http://www.rhopalocera.com/articles.html

The message was edited rhopalocera.com - 29.03.2013 15: 07

3 articles published in the first quarter, there is still an article in Zootaxa, but it can not be displayed. who needs to ask - there are 2 new species of cossids from South Africa.

File/s:



 3_Shcherbakov_al.pdf

size: 2.3 mb
number of downloads: 1321









 9_Dubatolov_Yakovlev.pdf

size: 1.44 mb
number of downloads: 620









 98_102_Yakovlev.pdf

size: 4.3 mb
number of downloads: 738

Who is interested in the article Yakovlev RV, Guskova EV. 2013. Mongolian Altai through the eyes of an entomologist / / Nature 5: 21-27 can be sent by request

Me!!! Send it to me!!!