Curculionidae

I want to share what is rich =)

First, a photo of Leucomigus candidatus - from the Orenburg region (!). Specialists, please consult - was it cited from there? And then something in the Lower Volga region it is limited to us...



Secondly, do I understand correctly that this is Leucophyes pedestris? Filmed near Saratov:



And please identify who it is (also Saratov):



Thank you =)

This post was edited by kotbegemot - 12/11/2013 21: 16

Previously, it was called Pachycerus cordiger (Germar, 1818), but it could have changed ten times already. Ilya will tell you for sure.

Previously, it was called Pachycerus cordiger (Germar, 1818), but it could have changed ten times already. Ilya will tell you for sure.

According to its website and Fauna Europaea, it is a nonche Pachycerus segnis (Germar, 1824). The only strange thing is that it's so pink (it's not the lighting, it was like that).

According to its website and Fauna Europaea, it is a nonche Pachycerus segnis (Germar, 1824). The only strange thing is that it's so pink (it's not the lighting, it was like that).

Yes! segnis now. pink is just normal. Lixin's integuments, as I understand it, emit waxy "pollen" (often quite bright: http://www.colpolon.biol.uni.wroc.pl/lixus%20angustus.htm or http://www.treknature.com/gallery/photo263523.htm), which is easily erased, but is restored fairly quickly in the living. And the dead beetles remain gray

This post was edited by Fornax13-12.12.2013 00: 29

First, a photo of Leucomigus candidatus - from the Orenburg region (!). Specialists, please consult - was it cited from there? And then something in the Lower Volga region we limit it... (kotbegemot)

For the Orenburg region. he was brought by Shapovalov (2012), and Chabanenko (2009) found him all the way to the Altai.

If Saratov, then Leucophanes pedestris is right

What subspecies are you talking about?

Protenomus saisanensis Schoenherr, 1826
E_Kazakhstan



This post was edited by OEV - 01.01.2014 21: 22

  Protenomus saisanensis Schoenherr, 1826
E_Kazakhstan

Oh my God what a bug!!! Handsome man

And very rare?

Oh my God what a bug!!! Handsome man    

And very rare?

I still have a couple, I will leave

And the yellowness - from the backlight? The elephant itself is probably black and white?

Yes, the drawing is white - there are some from the sands on the shore of Bukhtarminsky vdhr.

Oh my God what a bug!!!

...I'll stick a needle in his back. )

But seriously, I am concerned about Curculio from the Krasnodar Territory from the post URL #71. The lower one (which is a female) does not look like a venosus at all: ndkr. slimmer, ndkr drawing. different (blurry, not contrasting, without a sling); base of the mustache. in females, the venosus is noticeably further towards the middle of the gr. than in the beetle in the photo, and the gr. itself is thicker and slightly narrowed from the base to the antennae, which is also not observed in the photo.
I'm not sure about the type, because I don't know what else can be similar in the Caucasus. If we assume that this is elefas, then the ndkr. it seems that they should be slimmer, and the gtr. in females is very long (you will not understand this in the photo). Assume that pellitus - there are similarities in the drawing of the ndkr., the structure of the gr. and the location of the antennae, but you need angles of the beetle with the gr. in profile (the male "like elefas" would also look in profile) and a photo of the tooth of the hind thighs.
I will immediately make a reservation that I have not yet caught either elefas or pellitus (only venosus, villosus and glandium), although I shake oaks very tightly from early spring to autumn. In general, based on my experience, I would advise (as Elizar very correctly noted) to carefully check all certain "pellitus" products "for venous diseases". Pellitus seems to be much rarer than it is written about in green (for example).
With elefas, too, not everything is simple. Dikman (1988), for example, had no material on elefas from the territories east of Bulgaria-Hungary-Slovakia and assumed that the guidelines for Ukraine, Romania, and the East. Turkey may be more related to the similar propinquus. I have no information at all about what might be happening in the Caucasus.

Recently published an article about weevils-lixins, maybe someone will be interested:

Semyon Volovnik. On phylogenetic inertia: a case of Lixinae weevils
= Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.), Vol. 49, Iss. 3, 2013, р. 240-241

We forgot something about elephants, we need to update it
I'll start with the local elephants:

Pseudostyphlus pillumus (Gyllenhal, 1835)
C. Kazakhstan


Sibinia vittata Germar, 1824
C. Kazakhstan


Pachytychius ancora (Gyllenhal, 1836)
S. Tajikistan


This post was edited by OEV-04.04.2014 14: 32

I'll continue

Lepidonotaris petax (Sahlberg, 1823)
C. Kazakhstan

Notaris scirpi (Fabricius, 1792)
C. Kazakhstan

Tournotaris bimaculatus (Fabricius, 1787)
C. Kazakhstan

Theanellus bagoides Rtt., 1912
SW. Tajikistan


This post was edited by OEV-10.04.2014 23: 05

for some reason, it seems to me that the beetle in the last photo is different from the one with ZINA
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/RUS/thebagkm.htm
pronotum is less transverse and of a different shape, the scutellum is broad, the setae are longer, the club of the antennae is shorter

This post was edited by Mantispid - 11.04.2014 07: 53

for some reason, it seems to me that the beetle in the last photo is different from the one with ZINA
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/RUS/thebagkm.htm
pronotum is less transverse and of a different shape, the scutellum is broad, the setae are longer, the club of the antennae is shorter

Ilya for Tajikistan, only this species is represented, although it can be from the border who wandered

genus Theanellus Reitter, 1913a: 77 type species Theanellus bagoides Reitter, 1913
Syrdariella Ter-Minasian, 1977: 68 type species Syrdariella grisea Ter-Minasian, 1977

alepensis Pic, 1915a: 1 (Procas) A: S Y
alternons Faust, 1885c: 173 (Apachiscelus) A: UZ
antoinei Hustache, 1932a: 48 (Procas) N: MO
bagoides Reitter, 1913a: 77 A: AF KZ TD TM UZ
fastidiosus Pic, 1904c: 93 (Procas) N: TU
griseus Ter-Minasian, 1977:68 (Syrdariella) A: UZ
kocheriA. Hoffmann, 1953a: 140 N: MO
plumipilis Hustache, 1931b: 79 A: SY
indentatus Pic, 1934: 17
putoni Tournier, 1875b: ccix (Procas) N: AG
testaceus Bajtenov, 1974a: 37 (Procas) A: KZ

A couple more

Notaris imprudens Faust, 1885
Kirgizstan

Thryogenes festucae (Herbst, 1795)
Ukraine

Lepidotychius sp
SE Kazakhstan

Ilya photo is not so hot, I wanted to know your opinion

This post was edited by OEV-04/16/2014 12: 05

Here is this small identified as
Philernus sp
SE Kazakhstan

Ilya photo is not so hot, I wanted to know your opinion

isn't Tychius from the former Lepidotychius?
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/imag...orawitzi_za.jpg
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/imag...inkleri_zab.jpg

isn't Tychius from the former Lepidotychius?
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/imag...orawitzi_za.jpg
http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/imag...inkleri_zab.jpg

Ilya thank you, otherwise I've already gone through everything.

I think we should support the topic

Here is a completely miniature weevil (1.8 mm), but very beautiful!

Geranorhinus virens Faust, 1885
Russia: Astrakhan region, Krasnoyarsk district, Dosang Village, on Tamarix sp., 8. V. 2009, D. V. Potanin leg.

Pictures:

Geranorhinus_virens_zab.jpg — (283.85к)

I think we should support the topic

Here is a completely miniature weevil (1.8 mm), but very beautiful!

Geranorhinus virens Faust, 1885
Russia: Astrakhan region, Krasnoyarsk district, Dosang Village, on Tamarix sp., 8. V. 2009, D. V. Potanin leg.

What elegant Ilya cool photo than shot? I have a camera not for small beetles, and even through a microscope the yellowness comes out. I think you should buy

What elegant Ilya cool photo than shot? I have a camera not for small beetles, and even through a microscope the yellowness comes out. I think we should buy it

Canon EOS 650D + inverted kit 18-55

about yellowness-partially removed by "white balance", completely-by buying a white light lamp

Larinus (Larinomesius) ruber Motschulsky, 1845
= ferrugineus Capiomont, 1874

Russia, Orenburg region, Sol-Iletsky district, Troitsk village district, 19-21.V. 2012, A.M. Shapovalov leg.

6 mm

Pictures:

Larinus_ruber_zab.jpg — (84.68к)

Tychius crassirostris Kirsch, 1871
female

Saratov region, Tatishchevsky district, 2.2 km To Kologrivovka village, 799 km to Chamaecytisus ruthenicus, 6. V. 2012

Pictures:

Tychius_crassirostris_zab.jpg — (75.06к)

Ilya well done, good photos and elephants
I'll put up "my charm"
Entimus granulatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Peru

Entimus imperialis (Forster, 1771)
Brazil

And my charm looks like this )))

Tychius longulus Desbrochers, 1873

Russia, Saratov region, Saratovsky district, urch. "Budanova Gora", mowing with Astragalus macropus and Hedysarum grandiflorum, 9. V. 2013, I. A. Zabaluev leg.

Pictures:

Tychius_longulus_zab.jpg — (88.91к)

Another South American
Lamprocyphus augustus (Illiger, 1802)
Brazil


This post was edited by OEV-05.05.2014 22: 36

All the same weevil-
Ivanovo region, Teykovsky district, Rubskoe Lake 6.07.2003
Perapion violaceum

Pictures:

Perapion_violaceum_.jpg — (295.92к)

All the same weevil-
Ivanovo region, Teykovsky district, Rubskoe Lake 6.07.2003
Perapion violaceum

The photo is cool, considering the size of the beetle! Was the stack taken through a microscope?

No, via the Canon MP-E 65. Photo - not really, the bristles "float" on the apions. We need a smart fuel supply system.

Another Costa Rican, shot in a hurry
Exophthalmus nicaraguensis Bovie, 1907
Costa-Rica

I shot a stack of 10 photos through a trinocular on my Nikon D7000.
Software: NKRemote, Zerene Stacker, Adobe Photoshop.

Apion frumentarium (Linnaeus, 1758)
= miniatum Germar, 1833

England, London, Wandle Meadow nature reserve, April 29, 2014, on Rumex crispus:

Omias verruca Boheman, 1834
Tambov region, Sampursky district, Satinka village area, bereznyak's edge, 21. VI




This post was edited by AGG-05/20/2014 11: 05

  Omias verruca Steven, 1829
Tambov region, Sampursky district, Satinka village area, bereznyak's edge, 21. VI

Omias verruca Boheman, 1834 (not Steven, 1829!)

do you have this banal "garbage" view also in the CC?

of course-Korotyaev put it in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, so we should automatically turn it on. but I still don't understand what he lives on. I found it only once, practically in a pasture, where there was only small sagebrush, which the cows did not eat, and on the other sides planted birch trees and a field with rye

of course-Korotyaev put it in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, so we should automatically turn it on. but I still don't understand what he lives on. I found it only once, practically in a pasture, where there was only small sagebrush, which the cows did not eat, and on the other sides planted birch trees and a field with rye

It lives on cereals, especially where there is a developed turf. Usually, in one place, 3 types of omias are mowed down at once, some one in the mass, and the rest as an "impurity".