genera Syntomus, Microlestes, Apristus

The same quality (or better), but our species...
So far, only this.

Adamov, mikrolestesov like recently filmed, very cool shot, some guy from Lithuania, on Coleopterists.

Here are more Microlestets sp.
Kyrgyzstan, 10 km West cities of Jalal-Abad, Suzak Adyrs, h=810 m, 40 o 55 ' 57 "N, 72 o 53' 35 " E,
body length about 3 mm in light.
..

How many Microlestes (s) fly to the light, from the total experience?

I can send it to you if you need it.
In general, this is the first and only one

There, on the second label, it is indicated that this is the "3rd Amerekan-Russian-Kyrgyz expedition to study biodiversity", its results have been published?

Adamov, there is a controversial Microlestes from the Moscow region. Under the bark of a poplar tree, I got 3 copies. I can send you one. If you do, you will have a lot of respect. I don't have much experience in preparing ground beetles, so I probably can't handle such a small one...

...We are waiting for a determinant of this kind from you.

But this is the right line of thought!!! Respect!
And there are two schools of taxonomists, one of which postulates: defining tables are created by those who do not need them at all, for those who will never be able to work with them; and the second: according to the tables, the veterinary student must also determine the material. I'm in favor of the second one, but it's a utopia...

Maybe utopia, if we speak in an absolute sense. Of course, in any case, you need a skill. No one has ever learned to ride a bicycle after one turn with the pedals.

Adamov, recently caught Microlestes minutulus on dry land. In Fedorenko, the type is indicated for wet coastal biotopes. In this regard, he doubted himself and Komarov's table. Where does this species occur, where is it wet or where is it dry? Zherebtsov's is also indicated for dry places.

What do you mean by biological?

In the Moscow region, all species of this genus are rare, so it is not necessary to talk about which species prevails where. One or two beetles caught - already happiness.

I received a parcel with beetles! Thank you so much!!!
Skimmed through, M. badulini disappears. Now I will comprehensively measure and "sketch".
There, on the second label, it is indicated that this is the "3rd Amerekan-Russian-Kyrgyz expedition to study biodiversity", its results have been published?

Can you tell me what M. negrita is? And does this species have any characteristic features (other than the armament of the endophallus)?

But who will tell me about the mystical Syntomus ai Barsevskis, 1993, described from Jurmala (Latvia) and according to all review catalogs passing as a valid species? WHO, finally, will dare to take up and synonymize this nonsense?

I can't say anything about this Syntomus. I haven't really started doing this kind of thing yet.

Do you happen to have this article with a description?

Of course there is. If you can call it a description. Interested in the scan?

Of course!!! If there is anything else on these three genera , I will be very grateful.