13th, Friday, full moon... it's started!

Just spoke to Gundorov and read his post here. I am an old friend of his, and I helped him in his time with communication with foreign customers, when he established international exchanges of material. I read his post here. For the information of those present: after the" move " of the dead, Sergei had an exacerbation and was taken to a drug treatment center for 10 days. During this time, the tenants ran away from him (he rented out rooms), afraid of his condition. Unfortunately, after leaving the hospital, he started drinking again... In general, a lot of interesting things happened: from losing property at cards to large sums of money. I just sent him photos of the window where he saw the ghosts. It simply did not occur to me at the time that a person would be in such a position... He doesn't recognize himself as ill. Therefore, 2 treatments in narcology did not give a result, the wife left, took the child. Terribly sad.. one of the closest people...

Well, why one - the Saratov entomologist Igor Kryukov, his old acquaintance, comes to him.

"one of the closest people...."

"why one?"

..in the days of painful thoughts about the fate of my Homeland, you alone are my hope and support, O great and mighty Russian language ...


I sincerely hope that Sergey is fine.

This post was edited by Yakovlev - 04.12.2010 15: 05

Greetings to all forumchan. Please, do you have any photos of the elytra of a Large Oak barbel under a microscope? The search engines didn't turn up anything. It is not possible to investigate the bug yourself.

Greetings to all forumchan. Please, do you have any photos of the elytra of a Large Oak barbel under a microscope? The search engines didn't turn up anything. It is not possible to investigate the bug yourself.

Are you interested in anti-gravity?

Greetings to all forumchan. Please, do you have any photos of the elytra of a Large Oak barbel under a microscope? The search engines didn't turn up anything. It is not possible to investigate the bug yourself.

http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/eng/cercerms.htm
ОК?

Pirx yes very interesting. Over time, I want to get the beetle's elytra and try the same experiment with the button. In the meantime, I want to take a look at the structure itself, in any case, there is no microscope at hand right now. There is one person who claims that he himself saw how the button really bounced, and that it was the elytra of a Large oak barbel. But the platform is an invention.

Proctos thanks, but interested in the lower part of the elytra.

This post was edited by GBOX - 30.07.2011 22: 34

Pirx yes very interesting. Over time, I want to get the beetle's elytra and try the same experiment with the button. In the meantime, I want to take a look at the structure itself, in any case, there is no microscope at hand right now. There is one person who claims that he himself saw how the button really bounced, and that it was the elytra of a Large oak barbel. But the platform is an invention.

Proctos thanks, but interested in the lower part of the elytra.

Well, sho can be said... Good luck!

As I understand it, no one has any illustrations of this bug? Then tell me how and where it is better to catch it .

This post was edited by GBOX - 31.07.2011 10: 09

In Malawi (!) we met the nicest people - he's Scottish, she's Iranian-fans of Grebennikov and his flying machine. God, how small the world is!!!

Hello! Assuming that such an insect exists, what is its correct scientific name?

Hello! Assuming that such an insect exists, what is its correct scientific name?

Delirium tremens.

This post was edited by Dmitrich - 14.08.2011 17: 30

No other options? )) I like it only for the term http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delirium_tremens already have values, sorry.

Delirium tremens.

Perhaps the origin is of a psilocybin nature.

"Pepelac" In Latin, alas, in no way

No other options? )) I like it only for the term http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delirium_tremens already have values, sorry.

This does not prevent us from describing the genus Delirium with the species D. tremens.

This does not prevent us from describing the genus Delirium with the species D. tremens.

Uh-huh: "White-white and very hot."

Well, perhaps you still know better, you are experts in this business. That's why I asked for a consultation. As for this specimen, I can definitely say that it is a male, nocturnal.

Well, perhaps you still know better, you are experts in this business. That's why I asked for a consultation. As for this specimen, I can definitely say that it is a male, nocturnal.

Congratulations, you've discovered a new view: Rhoncus pepelacium ftr, 2011

This does not prevent us from describing the genus Delirium with the species D. tremens.

Only first you need to check whether such a genus has already been described. For example, Gallucinogenia already exists.

IMHO, it is extremely dangerous to give "meaningful" generic names - the chances of homonymy are very high.

I would be extremely grateful if I could see the translation along with the suggested values, and as for ftr, this is an abbreviation of the first and last name, my name is Thomas, but it will probably be more useful for science to display the way the body moves in the name than to insert my name))

I would be extremely grateful if I could see the translation along with the suggested values, and as for ftr, this is an abbreviation of the first and last name, my name is Thomas, but it will probably be more useful for science to display the way the body moves in the name than to insert my name))

This is Latin, but there is no Russian name yet. You have discovered an insect: you should be given the name.
They joked and it will be.

I was just wondering if such animals can be classified, assuming of course that they exist. And if you use the Google translator without understanding the types already described, then homonymy is not far away)) I apologize for interrupting you from your work.

Well, perhaps you still know better, you are experts in this business. That's why I asked for a consultation. As for this specimen, I can definitely say that it is a male, nocturnal.

How many types will there be?.. I mean, how big of a series have you prepared to describe? Or a single copy?

And how much do you need?)) The fact is that I drew a picture and have not yet come up with a name, because it should be in Latin, so it seemed more interesting to me, but the definition by species and types is a dark forest for me, in extreme cases I would like to know by what principle such names are given to types and species (genera?families?), you can refer to

What makes everyone think it's an insect? If you examine the above picture, the body is more like a fish, as close as possible to seahorses.

What makes everyone think it's an insect? If you examine the above picture, the body is more like a fish, as close as possible to seahorses .

If you are confused by its "tail", then this is not a fin, but chitin or whatever the dragonfly wings consist of, reinforced with longitudinal stiffeners. In general, this tail is slightly tilted, but in this projection it is imperceptible, so as to create an anti-rotational movement of the entire structure. But in general, I think it's definitely an insect.

I take many signs as my starting point. although discussing a fictional animal with a completely unrealistic morphology is stupid. So I'm leaving you

If you are confused by its "tail", then this is not a fin, but chitin or whatever the dragonfly wings consist of, reinforced with longitudinal stiffeners. In general, this tail is slightly tilted, but in this projection it is imperceptible, so as to create an anti-rotational movement of the entire structure. But in general, I think it's definitely an insect.

Well, why? It reminds me of an anomalocaris, but it definitely wasn't even an arthropod.

And how much do you need?)) The fact is that I drew a picture and have not yet come up with a name, because it should be in Latin, so it seemed more interesting to me, but the definition by species and types is a dark forest for me, in extreme cases I would like to know by what principle such names are given to types and species (genera?families?), you can use a link

At least one copy, then-quantum sadis. If you haven't even held the type in your hands, at least indicate where the instance (s) are stored.

I take many signs as my starting point. although discussing a fictional animal with a completely unrealistic morphology is stupid. That's why I'm leaving you

In general, I'm probably lucky that I'm not a science fiction writer who desperately needs the help of specialists for his next unreal story, well, let's say you need the name of a creature he invented that lives in unearthly conditions. Yes, nonsense, but that's his line of work. As a result(after reading comments not exactly yours,rhopalocera.com, and in general) he would have sworn off looking for professional designations and would have come up with his own, from the fool. And reading his own book, you would complain yourself, saying that domestic science fiction is complete nonsense. Am I wrong?
All you need is a sonorous Latin name, but it is common, ordinary, for this type, which is shown in the drawing.

You probably meant not professional, but plausible designations. But what's the point? Non-specialists will "eat" any of your names, it would be more fun or cleverer. You don't have a very correct idea of how taxon names are marked in terms of margins. There is no "database of names", from which you can, on occasion, pull out "a sonorous Latin name, while ordinary, ordinary" in order, let's put it this way, the nonsense that is presented. What's wrong with Delirium? Still, I can't resist saying that, I'm afraid, the vast majority of Russian fiction is emetic powder for completely different reasons than just the inability to come up with a name. And the first reason is the authors ' lack of imagination.

upd: I meant writers, if anything

This post was edited by Pirx - 08/15/2011 08: 36

Delirium tremens, on the contrary, I liked it, especially tremens in the subject, but this name implies that there are no subspecies, and the species itself is in a single copy(in general, I probably put it correctly), since it has such a coincidence of the names of the genus and species, consonant with a common and rather common phrase. I will not argue about the professionalism and plausibility of applying this situation to an entomologist or a science fiction writer, because it will already be a flood. You can tell me what kind of language this can refer to at least from afar , I'll figure it out myself, the main problem in this case is that I don't know Latin. Anomalocaris, for example, sounds good, but it already exists.

Previous message is mine.

I'm sorry, but I don't have the energy anymore. Download the ICZN or read it online, it's all there.

Thank you for what you needed.

Nema za scho.

I am interested in the price of web threads of roundworm spiders, in particular krestovikov and argyops. I want to sell them, is it possible?

This post was edited by Entomon - 22.02.2012 21: 24

And who, if it's not a secret, are you going to sell them to?

And who, if it's not a secret, are you going to sell them to?

For those who are interested