Now you can attach a photo, not only to species but also subspecies, as well as supra taxa

Community and Forum → Website news and updates → Now you can attach a photo, not only to species but also subspecies, as well as supra taxa

Peter Khramov, 14.08.2015 1:40

In order not to waste time, while I understand the update framework for insects, spread new technical functionality further Lepidoptera:
1. The two galleries instead of one (see. The next topic)
2. Snap pictures to any taxon, not only to the mind. Now, when uploading photos, and when you edit in the LC and the moderators shots tally to a taxon at any level. This flag is "determined inaccurately" refers specifically to affix taxon. For example, Papilio sp., Determined inaccurately means that you think that's kind of the genus Papilio, but are not sure they are right.Attention!Now when prostanovka taxon is better to wait avtopodstanovok with the number of taxa than just unsubscribe taxon and press Enter-(in the latter case it is also work, but there may be glitches, for example, in the case of like kind and subgenus - one only name the program will not be able determine where to push through Fautua,propihnet and its one of the options is not necessarily true).
3. Slightly redesigned interface - the new version is less extra clearances and more no harm.In addition, the control unit in the gallery moved to the right column (similar to a directory), and, given the large number of users who do not see the editing of samples in the catalog or the gallery, added more lines in the subtitle to the tip on this subject.
Questions, comments - Wellcome.

Comments

17.08.2015 20:44, Peter Khramov

By status:
Now there are the following gradation:

Tucson undefined - there are no bindings to any taxon. Even, for example, family. Where will these pictures:
1. Old photos from Lepidoptera, which remained from the time when it was possible to tie the photo only to the species, but not to other taxa.
2.New photos, that ship people not understanding at all in any taxa or do not understand how that load / when you download. Tucson determined to species or subspecies to - well, if there are further confirmation of fidelity definition, but in general, believe that everything is OK
Tucson determined to subgenus or higher - it requires a definition to the species or subspecies to (if possible).

Apart from all this is the jackdaw "imprecise definition."It is not relevant for the variant "taxon is not defined," but it is appropriate in the case to determine the type / subtype, and in the case of determining to superspecies taxon. And she says that, most likely it is that's it, but it is not 100% sure. IeThis property carries payload data: the user sees is not just Papilio sp, but "most likely view a certain" and although it recognizes that it is only "likely", not "just".So I think that to remove this checkbox will not have to, but it can be confusing (inaccurate determination we have, it turns out, is not a definition to superspecies taxon, as many believe, a definition to any taxon, but not 100% sure), and Furthermore, it may cause some damage "seriousness" of the site,bo "imprecise definition of" in entomology, is usually not used.

Perhaps the solution lies in the plane of terminology - to call the whole thing as something else, so that there was less confusion and the seriousness is not going away, but the information load remained.By glitches with fotami:
Shamil, throw off a reference to a problem page, I see.

18.08.2015 11:54, Peter Khramov

How is it determined the surname does not bear the load? It responsible for determining, with him to ask why, they say, have decided that it is, and not something out, etc. If this right is not explicitly specified, then the people will feel that determined who was shooting, and it is often not the case.And under fotoy in comments is not always evident, and most importantly - not all guess look.
Inaccurate:
In this fote (or general appearance) the type of undetectable and no additional. infa such as geography does not help. Then, of course, we set up the genus / subgenus.But there are also intermediate or even another thing the situation:
- For this fote undetectable, but near the sea sfotat other individuals who have defined views
- View undetectable in appearance, but can be relatively easily judged by geography / location
- Determine the type, but determining not 100% sure
What can I say, open a gallery inaccurate ph,1438 pieces there now, do you think that for all of them as the alleged infa carries no payload that can be put to their kind, and nothing it does not lose anything?

19.08.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov

Two criteria to determine the type of:
1. The types of genital photo is not defined.
2. The author does not know the definition of a number of species of the genus, and their images have no place to look.
Well, the worst option, the author of the definition of a fig does not know and vanities like the first race. We may very well be so. Trite and confuse species and race.Dmitry says good head agree, no heart, not habitually, have become accustomed to catch at Solomenka imprecise definition. Can we keep this in mind for the future? and it is certainly necessary to reduce the number of definitions to the taxon: genus, family, well, can still subfamily.and even so deal with the catalog, even knowing it is practically impossible (terrible confusion), will also be with the pictures above to determine the type, they just can not find. :(