Need photos of Rhopalocera butterflies in Russia

Community and Forum → Other questions. Insects topics → Need photos of Rhopalocera butterflies in Russia

Peter Khramov, 17.05.2015 19:08

Please share photos of Papilionoidea of Russia in order to refine the Modeling catalog to the catalog-determinant at least in part of the specified taxon / country.
Follow the link

CODE

http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=papilionoidea&country[]=55

you can see which types of illustrations are already available (most of them), and which photos are not yet available. Ideally, you need a spread and photos of all very different options (spring / summer form, male / female, top/bottom), not ideally-any photo of an un-illustrated type.
Photos can be uploaded via the link http://lepidoptera.ru/usercab/userupload (registration required on the site), about the use of photos on the site and copyrights: http://lepidoptera.ru/terms.

Learn more about the so-called directory identifier:

Amateurs often have a desire to determine the money at least approximately according to the signs that are understandable to amateurs (i.e., almost everyone who has completed at least seven years). Fans tease me about it.
I (and someone else) have a desire to sculpt samples of grandmothers according to various color characteristics.
In order to implement all this, it was decided to close up a pilot version for a limited number of species — we are taking only day-old Russian ones so far.

If you have any questions about the idea itself-ask here or on the Modeling site. And yes, we are all literate here, and we understand that it is necessary to cook, that the value of defining a teapot for science is nothing, etc., etc...

This post was edited by Asar - 17.05.2015 19: 09

Comments

Likes: 1

Likes: 2

09.07.2015 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov

In the section Erannis jacobsoni there is a photo of Erannis golda

About Chiasmia pluviaria, it is better to consult with specialists. Apparently, all references to this species refer to Chiasmia hebesata:
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennomina...a_hebesata.html
In the new lists, Ch. pluviaria is no longer listed.

Alexander, I do not agree with the first statement, I do not agree with its categorical nature, on this forum you tried to deal with these types for two years. And we didn't get any answers. Not enough of a bare statement, I apologize you gave two of your photos, I unfortunately do not know this type, but according to the analysis of what is on the web, I am inclined to jacobsoni. This definition was confirmed by T. Gordeeva, I don't want to say anything, but she defended herself on the moth of Buryatia, and worked specifically with these two species.

I fixed the second one. Added a view. I totally agree here.

Likes: 2