E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

All comments on Insecta.pro, except for the technical ones

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75... 218

18.11.2014 16:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #35091

Why can not tolerate that? ..

18.11.2014 16:26, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #27466

Jan, this shot is taken at Russian Far East. The species' looks are different there.

18.11.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #35326

Basil, if I'm not sure that male or female, you can not stand. :))

18.11.2014 16:05, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #35329

It looks like that does not immediately found. But calm would leave is now.

17.11.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35323

Define the following link: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/45_THYRIDOIDEA/Thyrididae/61.1_Striglininae/70_Monodecus/Monodecus%20capillatus/Monodecus%20capillatus.htm I put in yet inaccurate and need more opinions. While virtually assured of correctness. Until recently it was considered a subspecies of butterfly species Monodecus admirandus: ...

17.11.2014 16:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Cucullia magnifwa

Merge http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7134

17.11.2014 15:38, Vladimir Deryabin: comment on photo #34905

07.11.2014 17:05 Alexander Zhakov ... In the future, please, put in the definition of the Latin names that have not been dvoechteniya. :)) And then I would have had before:)) Of course before, no doubt - because in Latin, I would have written before the Second Coming. Thank you.

17.11.2014 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Cryphia acharista

Boursin Stas was written in the admin., When the photo was there, and then the math is simple: on the site in this genus species described this man go under the name Boursin : Cryphia sugitanii Boursin, 1961 ; Cryphia bryophasma (Boursin, 1951) ; Cryphia amygdalina (Boursin, 1963) ; Cryphia ochsi (Boursin, 1940) :) So it is necessary to correct: these are no coincidences.

16.11.2014 21:37, Dergg: comment on Trogidae MacLeay, 1819

Omorgus suberosus Fabricius, 1775Argentina, Salta, Chicoana, 9.II.2013, K. Tomkovich

16.11.2014 18:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #31852

None of this kind in Israel

16.11.2014 17:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35300

Two identical photos with 35301

16.11.2014 2:52, Jan Rasmussen: comment on photo #35280

Forgot to choose: Deilephila elpenor

16.11.2014 0:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35276

Portrait :) The idea can be removed if found true. Androkonii surezno and more than remarkable. Maybe it will tip some? It seems that somewhere saw like, but I can not remember (

16.11.2014 0:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on Aldania deliquata

This, apparently, a double page http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23209?

16.11.2014 0:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on Aldania yunnana

Peter, then to the synonyms for the title should be corrected typos, should write = tschetverikovi. But in general the subspecies tschetverikovi (Kurentsov, 1936) in Sinev given to Neptis deliquata Stichel, 1908, and here on the site Neptis tschetverikovi Kurentzov, 1936 is a separate kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120389.

15.11.2014 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35266

Aglais ioPvavliny eyes. Vladimir, well that you really? This is the same in Europe the most famous butterfly :)

15.11.2014 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35232

Very original cloth: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Рогоз Straight comes to mind is that the "upside down" hung up :) I Fill: I have all the swamp near the house closer to the fall in such "rags" :)

15.11.2014 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Delias berinda

Yes they are the same everywhere :) Just aglitskim problem as posted below ..... Moreover, biological, where he goes often mixed with Latin :)

15.11.2014 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35255

Rivula sericealis

15.11.2014 8:49, Stan Korb: comment on Births Neozephyrus and Chrysozephyrus (Lycaenidae).

smaragdinus is the type species Chrysozephyrus, it should only be there.

15.11.2014 1:12, Chromocenter: comment on Insects are the living mechanisms?

если насекомых можно, то и нас с вами тоже. поскольку вся наша жизнь состоит "из инстинктов и приобретённых рефлексов". или вы хотели сказать - врождённых? однако условные они тоже преобретают

14.11.2014 23:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35095

Hermeuptychia hermes

14.11.2014 23:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35125

Hermeuptychia hermes

14.11.2014 23:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35096

Hermeuptychia hermes

14.11.2014 23:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35089

Venezuela's endemic Hermeuptychia atalanta

14.11.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35236

Peter, there is no option, really. Illustrates.

14.11.2014 19:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #35227

It is strange that until now can be seen on the Nikon better blue, although it would seem, as the post-processing steps, not like before ... But it is all the lyrics.

14.11.2014 17:12, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31652

Probably another type.

14.11.2014 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35219

For the link I gave, at the bottom there are links to both types: they are more :)

14.11.2014 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35220

Too logical. I can not wait when Meschera tear, favorite on buduyuschy season plans for fishing on light there is thorough, with a generator and XRD (Tragosoma depsarium still not catching, and there it must be stopudovo) :) And while the material Tropical understand: too The point, however.

14.11.2014 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #19041

Peter, it is necessary to drive the date and the geography here: http://www.leps.it/ There's the lowest kind of picture in the gallery. I do not know, just like with this site provides links to species.

14.11.2014 8:32, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #34956

Thank you, Mr looked. Miokensis, perhaps -ultramarinovy ​​and caelestis - like. Only here urvillianus bred on farms and sell frequently, and these subtypes are not found

14.11.2014 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35184

I do see a lot of Including the fact that it has three days from the date of loading, with obviously the best definition. I see no reason to load new types until you have illustrated earlier supplies, including inaccurate.

14.11.2014 2:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34865

It is time.

13.11.2014 17:57, Honza: comment on Subgenus Cathaicus, Eupachys

  Добрый день, уважаемый Honza!Я с братом собрал эту серию glyptopterus (моя этикетка)Иволгинский район находится на южной оконечности Байкала. И биотоп, в котором собирались жуки выглядит совсем не так. В выходные прикреплю ...

13.11.2014 14:31, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #27961

Fishka- the difference in colors

13.11.2014 14:17, Andrey Kravtsov: comment on photo #35209

Many thanks for defining, thank you!

13.11.2014 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34739

That's right. Bestolku nose: it is not ( Only if the mustache, but the hammer polukilogramovym :) Pun: a good mood :)

13.11.2014 0:52, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #35205

Andrew, write to geography as well.

12.11.2014 23:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35106

Yeah, let the people look the same

12.11.2014 22:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35104

Pierella lena or Pierella astyoche

12.11.2014 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #35200

I got it, on the first question. In the second, the extra information is requested to remove, in the form of inaccurate, comments the author details, and all of them it is clear that that does not understand :)

12.11.2014 20:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34981

This Corades but without a top view will not say

12.11.2014 19:59, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #35062

Yes, the look already.

12.11.2014 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #35202

Variability was. In males, there are individuals with and without tails (caught on the same tree both)

12.11.2014 12:57, Jan Rasmussen: comment on photo #13735

Gillmeria sp.?

12.11.2014 8:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #15711

There is no certainty. You need to look original description.

12.11.2014 1:21, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #35186

Alexander! Photographed through the glass, and I have no way to get it out to remove the top and underside of one individual. There is a picture neighboring butterflies, but what it is I do not know. Wait a background replacement and skins, can be the same?

11.11.2014 23:24, kak2: comment on Biolam Lomo microscope.

Вот єто аппарат.

11.11.2014 22:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #30042

At altitudes from 1240 to 1460, I caught only Tanaorhinus rafflesii

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.