All comments on Insecta.pro, except for the technical ones
Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97... 218
Basil, a good point! I really tried! Here even almost got =) This is one of the first straightened me butterflies. The first was a swallowtail, but here it is not - it and so much))) It is a pity that Titania eaten. I found it quite by accident doll.
I join in the congratulations. Female sex on our website virtually Red is rare, and therefore particularly valuable and should be protected.
Most of all - it is! Quite often L. populi in 2012. I met on the dry (artificial) between the primer dd. Chernev and Tomasheva Orel settlement going on Indigenous south bank of the river. Road tight enough frames aspen. Poplar lentochniki examined for some reason the road sections with protruding gravel!)
Great! Many gems and freshies yet stocked and unpacked!)
In L. populi usually does not come down from the trees females and males can be taken directly from the ground (very much like to sit on the dirt). It's just from personal observation. I can not understand the picture the female or male?
In any case, thank you!) I have butterflies rented only three years. Dia in the "underside" I did not come across as well as in private collections gained a new copy!)
Only some have red spots. Please compare. Trifle but pleasure. As those two white spots of Vanessa atalanta...;)
Moved them all to Polia bombycina similarly, can't find anything better, hope Sergey was right.
Zoran, many plume moths are known for their quite specific resting pose including specific wing position towards body and perch, wing fold angle and number of other elements. I can approximately say what's gender, not Emmelina anyway.
No, the determinant, of course, fail. Ie technically nothing prevents, but to create it to no one. Here we consider just and only for color selection.Such a feature can be activated and to assist in determining the same, but more interesting might be even more opportunities for the selection of parameters and statistics for the color in different taxa and geo-locations.
This is not exuviae. No damages found during the check-up.
Sorry, didn't notice this is underside. Right, looks similar to croesus.
Vasily, whilst I was looking through pics :) you were faster :)
Carabus (Oxycarabus) saphyrinus pirithous Reitter, 1896n. sapancae Blumenthal & Breuning, 1967Turkey, Adapazari, Hendek, Beylice, h=300 m15-VIII-1992 m-25 mm, f-26 mm Картинки:C_saphyrinus_pirithous_n._sapancae.jpg — (186.07к)
Thank you, good to hear)
Carabus (Aulonocarabus) kurilensis ? daisetsuzanus Kono, 193624 ммN-Japan, Hokkaido, Katō District, Kamishihoro, Horoka near Maruyama Bridge,19.VI.2013, T. Hirabayashi leg. Картинки:______IMG_0871.jpg — (321.68к) Aulonocarabus_kurilensis_daisetsuzanus_Kono__1936.jpg — (81.63к)
The last generation is about 8—10cm long (raised them before). Neither small is the very moth :)
определённо это работа осы-пелопеяhttp://i2.guns.ru/forums/icons/forum_pictu...826/4826204.jpg
A.Schintlmeister - Notodontidae book has also quite decent illustrations of the species.
Coming back to what I started with, this region is described in 40th region whilst I found nothing on Pyrausta neocespitalis on the continent.
Alexandr, thanks. I neither thought about impura looking at the rest let alone the dot, that's why I prudently questioned this, just to clear this up for future cases)
Not crucial plus one minus one but it can help someone as for location.
Between two couples of "@"
I've googled for long)))
I see not Sesiidae but some hawkmoth. Can't say anything certain with such pic.
Considering the "warts" this is some saturniid.
Prayer hour.
Slightly seen reed abdomen in its sides. Too Chionarctia nivea. Synev describes it in 5 regions, 36th, 37th, 38th, 39th, 40th... I've got it as well in my collection :)
That's it. Just emerged and spreading its wings, thus the habitus seems kind of weird.
A white, supposedly Pareronia genus or something similar. Rare pic, don't want to keep this in not identified. Have been digging this already a few days, can't find. Anyone knows?
The specimen was IDed as E.unicolorella then updated as E. elutella. Tough family and genus, not sure of this new ID, no sense to move it from species to species :)
Cabera pusaria
I'm still at 7:44 asked Eugene, what to do and waited for an answer. But as you can see: spurred :) Frankly, if it were moved the MoD, would without question. In no other area of my Ochlodes not fly :) This in fact I trust: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/33-rhop/hesperiidae/30-hesperiidae
Vasily, I didn't offer any versions on what's this species. Just noted that this photo features the specimen quite well (despite two other pics of the specimen).
Read on old Dysgonia. The truth is it's not my favorite Wikipedia, but here, in the section "Former species" is painted like a who's who is now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgonia
MOVED.
Fixed, excess removed.
Let's keep this.
And I can not answer if you do not know the correct answer? and uncertain to hang until decide :)
Eudocima sp. Impossible to ID the species with this pic.
Calpinae Quite ragged Eudocima sp.? My diagnosis is that's impossible to ID the species with this pic...... Alas :(
According to the blue of the formDysgonia maturatacalled Bastilla maturata (Walker, 1858) Here it is necessary to remove from Dysgonia place here and now as Bastilla.
Moved to tentatively identified accroding to the author's comment. Looks more of T. subocellata: http://www.noctuidae.de/page/art/89_0762.html. There's also another wikipedia pic (don't like it personally but nearly no pics on the web): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Targalla_subocellata_(Noctuidae_Euteliinae).jpg
Thanks, so Pyralidae. I was looking for in Barsine as usual :)
Ectropis lutamentaria (Graeser, 1888) with funeta apparently was driven instead of Sinev: http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/ectropis/index.html There is still full of such inconsistencies due to lack of uniform classification of the site.
Sorry, not again put so defined.
Yeah, right! Sorry! You already said that.
+1 :)
The final touch: it is necessary to remove komenty here and ready to race :)
Well, where shall I go from here :) It's just nerves play tricks on all recently dissolved concoctions (and not only from her). Very poor become: old probably ... :( After the site is already almost five years and I already can not live without it :)
News
- 31.08.2024: Первые итоги интеграции/переноса/дублирования Молбиола и Инсекты
- 25.08.2024: Further adaptation of the website for mobile devices
- 14.08.2024: Auto applying the properties "taxon", "author of identification", "precision of identification" to all photos in a group when one of the photos is changed
New photos (15.09.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Doleschallia bisal...
- 16:38, P. Khramov: Not identified → Nymphalis canace /...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- The insects exhibition in Kotlas
- Butterflies and music: The Gumm Sisters, Where The Butterflies Kiss the Buttercups Goodnight
