Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97... 218
There are no subspecies T. trouana, while Trogonoptera brookiana following: ssp. albescens Rothschild, 1895 ssp. mollumar D'Abrera, Doggett & Parker, 1976 ssp. trogon Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1860 ssp. noname, loc South Sumatra, Mt Dempo ssp. jikoi Kobayashi, 1986 ssp. akikoae Morita, 1994 ssp. mariae Neukirchen, 1993 ssp. toshikii Kobayashi, 1991 ssp. cardinaali Haugum & Low, 1982 ssp. ...
Basil, a good point! I really tried! Here even almost got =) This is one of the first straightened me butterflies. The first was a swallowtail, but here it is not - it and so much))) It is a pity that Titania eaten. I found it quite by accident pupa.
I join in the congratulations. Female sex on our website virtually Red is rare, and therefore particularly valuable and should be protected.
Most of all - it is! Quite often L. populi in 2012. I met on the dry (artificial) between the primer dd. Chernev and Tomasheva Orel settlement going on Indigenous south bank of the river. Road tight enough frames aspen. Poplar lentochniki examined for some reason the road sections with protruding gravel!)
In L. populi usually does not come down from the trees females and males can be taken directly from the ground (very much like to sit on the dirt). It's just from personal observation. I can not understand the picture the female or male?
In any case, thank you!) I have butterflies rented only three years. Dia in the "underside" I did not come across as well as in private collections gained a new copy!)
Only some have red spots. Please compare. Trifle but pleasure. As those two white spots of Vanessa atalanta...;)
Zoran, many plume moths are known for their quite specific resting pose including specific wing position towards body and perch, wing fold angle and number of other elements. I can approximately say what's gender, not Emmelina anyway.
No, the determinant, of course, fail. Ie technically nothing prevents, but to create it to no one. Here we consider just and only for color selection.Such a feature can be activated and to assist in determining the same, but more interesting might be even more opportunities for the selection of parameters and statistics for the color in different taxa and geo-locations.
Carabus (Oxycarabus) saphyrinus pirithous Reitter, 1896n. sapancae Blumenthal & Breuning, 1967Turkey, Adapazari, Hendek, Beylice, h=300 m15-VIII-1992 m-25 mm, f-26 mm Pictures:C_saphyrinus_pirithous_n._sapancae.jpg — (186.07к)
Carabus (Aulonocarabus) kurilensis ? daisetsuzanus Kono, 193624 ммN-Japan, Hokkaido, Katō District, Kamishihoro, Horoka near Maruyama Bridge,19.VI.2013, T. Hirabayashi leg. Pictures:______IMG_0871.jpg — (321.68к) Aulonocarabus_kurilensis_daisetsuzanus_Kono__1936.jpg — (81.63к)
this is definitely the work of the Pelopean wasphttp://i2.guns.ru/forums/icons/forum_pictu...826/4826204.jpg
Coming back to what I started with, this region is described in 40th region whilst I found nothing on Pyrausta neocespitalis on the continent.
Alexandr, thanks. I neither thought about impura looking at the rest let alone the dot, that's why I prudently questioned this, just to clear this up for future cases)
Slightly seen reed abdomen in its sides. Too Chionarctia nivea. Synev describes it in 5 regions, 36th, 37th, 38th, 39th, 40th... I've got it as well in my collection :)
A white, supposedly Pareronia genus or something similar. Rare pic, don't want to keep this in not identified. Have been digging this already a few days, can't find. Anyone knows?
The specimen was IDed as E.unicolorella then updated as E. elutella. Tough family and genus, not sure of this new ID, no sense to move it from species to species :)
I'm still at 7:44 asked Eugene, what to do and waited for an answer. But as you can see: spurred :) Frankly, if it were moved the MoD, would without question. In no other area of my Ochlodes not fly :) This in fact I trust: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/33-rhop/hesperiidae/30-hesperiidae
Vasily, I didn't offer any versions on what's this species. Just noted that this photo features the specimen quite well (despite two other pics of the specimen).
Read on old Dysgonia. The truth is it's not my favorite Wikipedia, but here, in the section "Former species" is painted like a who's who is now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgonia
Calpinae Quite ragged Eudocima sp.? My diagnosis is that's impossible to ID the species with this pic...... Alas :(
According to the blue of the formDysgonia maturatacalled Bastilla maturata (Walker, 1858) Here it is necessary to remove from Dysgonia place here and now as Bastilla.
Moved to tentatively identified accroding to the author's comment. Looks more of T. subocellata: http://www.noctuidae.de/page/art/89_0762.html. There's also another wikipedia pic (don't like it personally but nearly no pics on the web): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Targalla_subocellata_(Noctuidae_Euteliinae).jpg
Ectropis lutamentaria (Graeser, 1888) with funeta apparently was driven instead of Sinev: http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/ectropis/index.html There is still full of such inconsistencies due to lack of uniform classification of the site.