Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 52
Chrysoteuchia sp. C. pseudodiplogramma, C. diplogramma, and C. argentistriella are very similar in appearance; V. A. Kirpichnikova's monograph indicates that they reliably differ only by genitals.
I got it) No, I don't have this photo attached either. By the way, on all of mine, this one anchor point does not open immediately, with a delay of 15-20 seconds. But I checked a few unconnected ones so far - everything is fine, the map is not naked, all my points are visible.
It’s strange, but I have all the markers here in place, including 2 of yours in the Barabash-Levada surrounding area. Evgeniy, are the checkboxes above the map checked?
Yura was right, I think. Of the 5 species of the genus found in Southeast Asia, only iphiata has such a pattern in the apex and a smoothed line WK.
Since there are 2 photos with my definition on the site, I think it is necessary to explain why out of 5 local species of Phengaris I identified it as kurentzovi. 2 species - arionides and cyanecula - fall off immediately, completely different underside, in kurentzovi and teleius they are about the same distance from the root. It turns out that the choice is between the latter. ...
Thank you again, Sasha! I didn't finish it( I looked at all 43 DV views of the tribe, but there were no illustrations of this particular view on jpmoth. And I didn't even look at Berlov's, but she is there and is quite recognizable)
Alexander, you do not understand, I am not on sailboats, but I am responsible for illustrating the views on the site for all detachments (to help Peter). Here, if somewhere for some reason the view is not illustrated, although there is already a photo to it - you can contact)
The discussion should really be moved to the "Site Discussion", but for now I will answer Al. Dumchus here to a specific question about Papilio alcmenor, since this concerns me. I looked - I do NOT have this view in the LC, as it is not illustrated. Everything that comes to the LC, I illustrate on time, almost every day). There is no first photo in the view illustration (that's why the window is ...
:) I generally left this family far away "for later", least of all thinking about it. But I reviewed a lot of interesting things, to which my hands would not have reached ))
Thank you, Sasha! I didn't get to Cnephasiini)) I tried to find the Catalog that we fly in October, setting the selection parameters "summer time", but alas, I did not take into account that it is not registered everywhere(
No, Sasha, this is different. According to you, the image is the same and not too good. According to the photo below-3 photos, one of them is a straightened copy. It's long, the end of the link went over the edge, but I just tried opening it directly from this page, making the page scale smaller (50%) - and everything opened. I will also try to write it to you in the personal account
http://www.jpmoth.org/Gelechiidae/Dichomeridinae/Dichomeris_okadai.html http://photozou.jp/photo/show/1433095/199103679
At least 7-8 Japanese websites, including the following ones: jpmoth.org, this butterfly stands as Cymotricha japonicella (for example, http://moth.tamagaro.net/a/0093.htm http://osaka-insecta.sakura.ne.jp/moth/d-usudumasujikibaga.html), and two more as Dichomeris japonicella. On our website, it is probably in a different genus - Brachmia japonicella. But since in the Blue it does not exist at ...
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/51_Tortricidae/5001%20Tortricinae/500135_Acleris/50013557_Acleris_conchyloides_0225/Acleris_conchyloides.htm http://photozou.jp/photo/show/1433095/229204691
Judging by the attribute that was discussed here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/56200, then it is Aplocera plagiata Or are there doubts? What will experts say - does this feature work?
Understood, Sasha, thank you! I'm sure I can't figure it out on my own) And xanthodippe is also in Blue (resp. and on our website) available for Primorye, so the choice is great)
I didn't find the xipe taxon in Blue at all (maybe now it's xanthodippe?) Sasha, if you have time, please watch the discussion on molbiol that I linked to here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/33422. There just Pavel Gorbunov identified butterflies from Primorye as Argynnis xipe. At Tuzov's http://rusinsects.com/nymph/n-a-xipe.htm it is indicated in Taxanomic notes that this species was until ...