E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 52

13.10.2016 0:42, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27951

There was a reason to doubt the accuracy of the identification. Please move to Archips dichotomus. Explanations here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/60346

13.10.2016 0:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #60346

Finally, in addition to the drawing and description, we managed to find good images of Archips dichotomusin the RDV Insect Identification Guide (vol.5, part 3, p. 136). The image of the female appeared on the Lepiforum http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Archips_Dichotoma, самца (паратип) – нашла здесь ...

13.10.2016 0:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #60339

Think here Argynnis xipe (here Fabriciana xipe)

11.10.2016 23:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on Archips pulcher

Archips pulchra view comment (removed from database 12.10.2016 9:11): Duplicate view http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/20649

11.10.2016 23:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on Archips nigricaudanus

Comment on Archips nigricaudana (deleted from database 12.10.2016 9:25): Duplicate of the view http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/20641

11.10.2016 23:48, Irina Nikulina: comment on Archips ingentanus

Comment to Archips ingentana (deleted from database 12.10.2016 9:18): Duplicate of the view http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/20639

11.10.2016 23:47, Irina Nikulina: comment on Archips dichotomus

Comment on Archips dichotoma (removed from database 12.10.2016 9:17): Duplicate of the species http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/20636

11.10.2016 23:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on Archips capsigeranus

Comment on Archips capsigerana (removed from database on 12.10.2016 9:16): Double view http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/20634

11.10.2016 23:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on Archips breviplicanus

Comment on Archips breviplicana (removed from database 12.10.2016 9:15): Duplicate of the type http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/20633

11.10.2016 23:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on Archips subrufanus

Comment to Archips subrufana (deleted from database on 12.10.2016 9:13): Double view http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/20645

26.09.2016 19:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #7679

This is not alwina, I uploaded alwina's underside (#60179) You can see alwina here http://catocala.narod.ru/nym10.html. And at the photo Neptis philyroides

26.09.2016 17:49, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #36979

This is Neptis philyroides (underside #36978)

19.09.2016 23:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on Thyris fenestrella

It is necessary to add the subspecies T. f. ussuriensis Zaguljaev, 1985 (RDV)

18.09.2016 16:52, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #30675

Ypsolopha amoenella

18.09.2016 16:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #46550

Spilosoma lutea

15.09.2016 22:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #60039

Eugene, until I started to illustrate the view, because I found the same photo in the form of Eucarta arctides http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/59716. What is correct? Apparently, here's where the definition of A.Matova? I reviewed all my own and your productions this year. To be honest, I do not have complete clarity on the 3 seaside similar species arctides, arcta and fasciata and do not really ...

09.09.2016 13:32, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59927

Subspecies Paratalanta cultralis amurensis (Romanoff, 1887) in the Far East of the Russian Federation. This definition was confirmed by V. A. Kirpichnikov

07.09.2016 1:30, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59000

You can transfer it to Dendrolimus superans sibiricus, I figured out two seaside species.

04.09.2016 21:51, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59848

Narosoideus flavidorsalis

04.09.2016 21:51, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59847

Narosoideus flavidorsalis

04.09.2016 21:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59846

Phrixolepia sericea

04.09.2016 21:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59845

Phrixolepia sericea

01.09.2016 23:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59779

On Japanese sites, a species in the genus Cossus http://www.jpmoth.org/Cossidae/Cossinae/Cossus_insularis.html, in the DVR Insect Identifier (vol. 5, part 2), the species is in the genus Holcocerus.

01.09.2016 23:48, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59777

Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929 In R. V. Yakovlev's article " Systematic revision of the odorous woodworm-COSSUS COSSUS (LINNAEUS, 1758) (LEPIDOPTERA, COSSIDAE) "(AZZH I (1), 2009. 57-71) taxon orientalis has been assigned a specific status and a detailed description and differential diagnosis of the species Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929 , which differs well from Cossus cossus, is given. A new ...

01.09.2016 23:47, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59778

Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929

01.09.2016 23:47, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #42453

Cossus cossus

01.09.2016 23:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #42452

Cossus cossus

01.09.2016 23:45, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #42454

Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929

01.09.2016 15:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #8289

Yes, it's also paki

01.09.2016 15:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #42597

Yes, Sasha, it is, I wrote about it in the first post about the article.

01.09.2016 15:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59733

Join us!) Thank you, Sasha! And, you won't believe it, one of the first assumptions when I started looking for tufts was furcula) But I asked Yura about the size, the answer was - "1 cm, well, no more than 1.5 in length" ... and I somehow left this thought, switched, clinging to the size, to the second option-Micromelalopha. Furcula-something like more, even the smallest of them - ...

01.09.2016 0:14, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58438

Megalycinia strictaria? But we also have Synopsia strictaria on our site And in the Catalog Sineva (book) the species is given in the genus Synopsia. But apparently Megalycinia strictaria is valid http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=445849

31.08.2016 22:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55693

Costaconvexa caespitaria, I think

31.08.2016 22:32, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59439

Horisme tersata

31.08.2016 21:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59697

I agree, of course, that the issue is not closed. I fully admit that I could have made a mistake in the assumption (I also had a lot of doubts), but it is better to express it for discussion, since it has appeared)

31.08.2016 17:27, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59749

According to V. A. Kirpichnikova, a rather rare firefly from the pantropical genus Bradina Lederer, 1863, found in Primorye and in the south of the Khabarovsk Territory. On the territory of the Far Eastern Federal District, it is represented by the subspecies Bradina atopalis krigeri, Streltzov et Dubatolov, which is described in detail in the article by A. N. Streltsov and V. V. Dubatolov "The ...

31.08.2016 16:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59697

A butterfly, unfortunately. very shabby. and yet I dare to make one bold assumption) And it can't be one of the three seaside crested babies from the genus Micromelalopha? Yura said. that it's very small. The remnants of bandages at the edge of the wing in shape seem to me similar to Micromelalopha troglodyta, it has a wingspan of 24-26 mm, and according to data from jpmoth, even less - 15-20 ...

31.08.2016 1:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #42598

>>>>

30.08.2016 21:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33022

Evgeny, over the past 2 years there are 5 photos of different Timandra that I haven't posted yet, because I wouldn’t risk defining anything other than recompta for 40th Russia region at the moment.May be you are right and this is dichela in this photo. But not because of the shape of the sling. Last fall, I was trying to figure it out. I copied more than 25 images of Timandra from the network ...

30.08.2016 20:27, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59671

http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=466507 I shot similar butterflies in Anisimovka last year (#46643 and #46644). During the year, I reviewed the possible options and still dared to put them in inaccurate ones. If there are no objections, maybe last year's ones can be transferred to inaccurate abraxina?

26.08.2016 11:04, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33093

Eugene, there is no need to count:) Select Gallery - further in the selection parameters choose Noctuidae, photographer and select Primorsky Krai as Location. Here are the results and the photos. Very convenient:)

26.08.2016 10:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59511

Acosmetia chinensis

25.08.2016 11:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59432

Apparently, so. I looked at all the pictures, most similar to the Italian one with a very wavy post-basal sling and the Swiss ones (1 and 3-4) with lepiforum.de, only much more contrasting.

25.08.2016 0:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59432

No, Sash, I don't know anything like that. What confused you? I have no doubts about it, it seems that everything is within the limits of variability. There were a lot of them, all about the same, and they don't differ much from last year's ones. Many have wider dark bandages than in most images. There are other camera angles (but not this ex), I can show you. I did not put it, the photos are not ...

20.08.2016 13:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33093

Of course, we will wait for the opinions of Evgeny and Alexey. Let me explain what particularly confused me - this white spot. According to the book by Kononenko the differential diagnosis of these species (p. 179): E. mixta differs from its congeners in duller wing color with more expressed mossy greenish tint, absence of white reniform stigma, and less expressed or not expressed yellow patch ...

20.08.2016 13:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on Bena

Usually, when illustrating one of the species and the genus is automatically illustrated, but for some reason this did not happen( Now manually). I only receive information about non-illustrated types in the personal account)

18.08.2016 16:11, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33094

And this one is just Euromoia mixta, in my opinion.

18.08.2016 16:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #33093

Evgeniy, could there be any confusion when taking two pictures? I dealt with my own from Anisimovka, looked at Kononenko (and descriptions too), and here, I think, subpulchra. Sasha, I ask you again - look at the book these 2 types (pl. 22), please, I don't seem to be mistaken, but I can't check on other sites yet.

18.08.2016 9:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59300

Yes, apparently, no) Reinsured, the view is new for me, I have never taken a picture before, the butterfly is relatively small, I wanted you to look at the book of Kononenko again, no other images on the network I just did not open here.

17.08.2016 22:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59300

I think Catocala danilovi

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.