Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14... 52

23.03.2016 15:06, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55635

Amphipoea sp.

23.03.2016 15:02, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55641

Agnidra scabiosa

22.03.2016 15:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55604

I think that this is a different kind - Olethreutes captiosanus signs distinguishing captiosanus from close arcuella and subtillana, also found in 37 reg - on a PC in the median field has only 3 sparkles in a black spot and there is always sparkles between this spot and the dorsal edge of the wing vein of a 2 + 3 ( "DDA to insects," 5: Part 3, page 259.) You can compare on our website, for ...

18.03.2016 16:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55384

It Paratalanta sp.V Primorye 5 types, 3 of them look very similar - cultralis, taiwanensis and ussurialis. (Here all 3 -http: //www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Paratalanta.html) Pinpoint photo to form as written, VA Kirpichnikova impossible.

18.03.2016 14:14, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55498

Omiodes tristrialis , I think

18.03.2016 14:00, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55499

Hypsopygia iwamotoi gave explanations here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/3838

18.03.2016 10:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55511

We've got kind of Nacoleia maculalis In Sinev in comments to maculalis written - "The erroneous definition: sibirialis auct (nec Zeller, 1852)." All the previous set to maculalis. Although Asian sites, including the jpmoth.org, she - Nacoleia sibirialis (Milliere, 1879) http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Nacoleia_sibirialis.html It would be necessary to deal with this.

16.03.2016 17:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #47398

Here is the same track of Anisimovka http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55255, which passed on the following day, together with Jure fodder plant and which proved Acronicta catocaloida . For the determinant catocaloida DDA insects (part 4, that is, 5) and in the book of VSKononenko in feed Set only Mongolian oak, but I remember exactly that for a long time watching her, absorbing it bean, filmed ...

01.03.2016 15:17, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #53755

According to their liking) I agree with Eugene. This figure frequently in the Far East - sticticalis, is already one of the 37 regions, and in the monograph by VA Kirpichnikova brother- twin p. 501

01.03.2016 2:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #53622

In Sinev Rhynchopalpus fumosa Overlooking gigas already understood, apparently, there are more doubles (

22.02.2016 11:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #52756

Ure, none of the above did not bother me, autumnaria quite changeable, strokes, which you write (if I understood correctly), uncommon (http://britishlepidoptera.weebly.com/232-ennomos-autumnaria-large-thorn.html http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/e/ennomos_autumnaria.html), c), including in your butterflies and the surrounding regions (for example, look at Al. Kuzmina https://fotki.yandex.ru ...

21.02.2016 21:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #52770

Polistessp. Perhaps,Polistes riparius

21.02.2016 21:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #52771

Polistessp. Probably,Polistes chinensis(bright fringes on the edges of the pronotum is connected with bordering her front)

21.02.2016 19:54, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #52756

I think maleEnnomos autumnaria

21.02.2016 19:34, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51966

Agapanthia pilicornis?

21.02.2016 19:14, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #52781

Phymatapoderus flavimanus

21.02.2016 19:13, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #52783

Apoderus rubidus

09.02.2016 20:01, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #52353

Eugene, and geography are on the English version - Ecuador, La Selva Lodge (Yasuni National Park). This nat. Yasuni park in the eastern part of Ecuador's border with Peru.

04.02.2016 20:53, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #10217

Here at last I found in ist-ke, which I do not know, inf. such - http://sphingidae.myspecies.info/taxonomy/term/75. A Callambulyx tatarinovii versicolor Gehlen, 1941, which is given to all subspecies nizhenazvannyh ist-kah, and on our website, here given as invalid and is a synonym for Callambulyx tatarinovii eversmanni http://sphingidae.myspecies.info/taxonomy/term / 5205.

04.02.2016 20:12, Irina Nikulina: comment on Callambulyx tatarinovi

Note to Callambulyx tatarinovii mind (removed from the database 05.02.2016 13:39): The double http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/16491 page

04.02.2016 20:00, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #10217

Eugene, thank you. About S. kindermanni like everything is clear - do not have it there. It is now a question of (subspecies) C. tatarinovi eversmannii. The site http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/c_tat.htm S. tatarinovi f. eversmannii (Eversmann, 1854) called the form (in ADULT DESCRIPTION AND VARIATION). In the same in this regard refer to the work Gordeyev (Gordeyev TV, Gordeyev SY 2011. ...

03.02.2016 22:34, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #10217

Ure, a subspecies ( ssp. ) then I just did not mention it was a brown uniforms C. tatarinovii f. eversmannii, which occurs mainly in the Trans-Baikal and sometimes mistaken for Smerinthus kindermanni . The image of this form of C. tatarinovi f. eversmannii (Eversmann, 1854) (photo by P. Gorbunov) is here http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=185709&view=findpost&p=579945, below ...

03.02.2016 10:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #10217

Once we are today about this kind I came in, and I'll write about this caterpillar. I read the discussion. Firstly, in Primorye there Smerinthus kindermanni. And in the "Key to the DDA insects, v.5, ch. 3," and Sinev Primorye indicated only Caecus S. and S. rlanus.About finds kindermanni in Primorye had never heard, and reports findings kindermanni Transbaikalia considered erroneous definition, ...

27.01.2016 23:08, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51996

Phaneroptera falcata?

27.01.2016 11:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51958

Acrocorisellus serraticollis

27.01.2016 11:22, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51954

Acrocorisellus serraticollis

27.01.2016 11:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51964

There certainly is no need to migrate to the mind when it will be made

27.01.2016 0:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51963

Pentatoma metallifera

27.01.2016 0:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51964

Pentatoma semiannulata

27.01.2016 0:13, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51960

Palomena angulosa

23.01.2016 11:32, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51287

Elaphria venustula

23.01.2016 11:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #51369

Sabra harpagula

29.12.2015 23:34, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50648

Notodonta dromedarius

29.12.2015 23:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50647

Triodia sylvina

29.12.2015 23:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50645

Herminia tarsicrinalis

29.12.2015 23:27, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50646

Clostera anastomosis

29.12.2015 23:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50644

Axylia putris

29.12.2015 18:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50626

I thinkSchiffermuelleria schaefferella

29.12.2015 18:23, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50625

Scoparia pyralella?

29.12.2015 18:21, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50622

Cosmorhoe ocellata

29.12.2015 18:20, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50623

Hydriomena impluviata?

29.12.2015 18:18, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50621

Pelurga comitata

27.12.2015 11:41, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50569

Thank you, Eugene! I knew immediately about any shot you write because it including focused assuming here vietinghoffi)) Well, that everything is now on the right places)

26.12.2015 22:31, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #50569

Carabus vietinghoffi? (Eugene, still dare to make three assumptions loved you Carabus), do not be surprised if erroneous, photo Complicated)