E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11... 52

13.08.2016 20:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #26676

It's a duplicate of photo #26335

13.08.2016 20:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #37168

Double of the photo #37134.

11.08.2016 21:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #56496

Sitochroa verticalis

11.08.2016 20:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58456

Odontopera bidentata?

11.08.2016 17:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58734

Euroctis niphonis (on Asian sites and in V. V. Dubatolov's article in the Amur Zoological Journal V(2), 2013 - Kuromondokuga niphonis)

11.08.2016 17:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58140

Most likely mutable Thitarodes variabilis http://catocala.narod.ru/hep01.html and http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?s=d9d492337d8493796568cae5fdc301d3&showtopic=374388&view=findpost&p=1629220

09.08.2016 11:26, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59188

Yura, I don't understand what this " link to a summary of other authors on the European species, and maybe subspecies? How does it fit in with OTHER species?"? I also wrote that Stanislav gave in his article on the designation of the lectotype, the first description of the species epaminondas, taken from the book by G. Lang. Where is it written that this is a European species? Type series are ...

09.08.2016 0:04, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59188

Unfortunately, until the end of August there will be neither "official sources" at hand, nor a normal Internet, so I will write from memory what I remembered when dealing with the views 2 years ago. Jurassic, in nature, it is the shade of the wings and the size that first catches the eye – small yellowish-brown low-contrast epaminondas and larger grayish with a more contrasting pattern of the ...

05.08.2016 12:25, Irina Nikulina: comment on Sophta subrosea

This is a mistake in spelling the genus, right Soph t a http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acontiinae+Eustrotiinae/Sophta_subrosea.html. In the Catalog edited by Sineva also Soph t a.

31.07.2016 22:35, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59054

This is Ghoria collitoides They are similar to gigantea, differ in the color of the head, gigantea has a yellow head.

27.07.2016 23:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #59000

Dendrolimus superans?

27.07.2016 0:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58980

Orgyia antiqua

26.07.2016 19:32, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58970

Eugene, I ventured to put in inaccurate rosacea. because I have made a note to these frames about the size. If you remember, there were also typical miniatas (in size), I don't think I even took them off, and a few "babies", much smaller than miniata. I took them off so I could sort them out later. I read about the difference in size from V. V. Dubatolov ...

26.07.2016 15:29, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58961

Nerice davidi

16.07.2016 8:46, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58736

Diaprepesilla flavomarginaria

03.07.2016 18:12, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58397

When I examined my summer seaside Archips in detail, I found all 15 images of males + descriptions and almost all (13) of females. The first impression I got yesterday from this photo is that we should look for exactly among these three - dichotomus, fumosus and issikii. But in issikii (it even has A. abietis synonyms), the caterpillars live and feed exclusively in the interwoven fir needles (in ...

03.07.2016 0:16, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #47096

Matov A. Yu. (ZIN RAS) confirmed the definition. More precisely, he wrote that it is Lacanobia amurensis. I didn't find this type on our site, but here http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Lacanobia_Amurensis found to be a synonym for Lacanobia aliena

03.07.2016 0:10, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #47097

Lacanobia contigua Identified by Matov A. Yu (ZIN RAS)

03.07.2016 0:07, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #49046

Matov A. Yu. (ZIN RAS) confirmed the definition of this and 3 subsequent (#49047, #49048 and #49049) images Acronicta major

03.07.2016 0:05, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #49052

Acronicta major

03.07.2016 0:03, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #49053

Acronicta major

03.07.2016 0:02, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #47315

Athetis albisignata Identified by A. Y. Matov (ZIN RAS)

02.07.2016 23:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #47831

Mythimna turca Identified by A. Y. Matov (ZIN RAS)

02.07.2016 23:58, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #27467

Mythimna turca was identified by Matov A.Yu. (ZIN RAS)

02.07.2016 23:54, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #49005

Apamea sordens Determined by Matov A. Yu. (ZIN RAS) Figured out the differences in the reniform spot (the border of the reniform spot in sordens and indistinctly traced in pabulatricula)and, in addition, pabulatricula has a black stroke on the blurred brown.a field that connects internal and external fields. bandages.

02.07.2016 23:43, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #49001

Apamea sordens

29.06.2016 22:34, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58368

Already tried to figure it out after the discussion here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46350, but no response yet(

27.06.2016 15:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58313

Angerona prunaria

21.06.2016 18:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58224

On Sakhalin, apparently, Phragmatobia amurensis

19.06.2016 19:15, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #58195

Think Xanthorhoe rectantemediana

19.05.2016 10:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55498

Sasha can be transferred to the form. Yesterday this photo VA Kirpichnikova already received a reply confirming the determination.

18.05.2016 18:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #55472

And what are confused, Sash? It has long wanted to write here to support Yurino definition forget (reconsidered the entire family, all females, no one else with the top like and do not. Ruslan and pafiya others. For females andiomeny characterized by a vast dark pattern and a white spot at the apex in the background shading. True , AIKurentsov even denied the existence of Argynnis anadyomene on ...

12.05.2016 16:36, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57421

I would say that this is just the top characteristic of the male C. ladonides. And the network has an image, for example http://catocala.narod.ru/lyc0175.html and http://www.lycaenidae.gmxhome.de/Lycaenopsis/Celastrina/celastrina-index.htm would put rather inaccurate to ladonidam. But the differences of male and ladonidy Barkhatova somehow end up not all clear ladonida brighter, pogolubee ...

05.05.2016 12:33, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57197

Here, I think, rather Chrysoteuchia sp. All 3 of 37 Calamotropha registration and another 3 from nearby - others. But the form is hardly possible - and an uncomfortable angle, and a few closely related species differ only in the genital analysis. Here already wrote http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47065.

05.05.2016 11:38, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57203

Sash, I, too, on this type of question has long been hanging since Sinev in the catalog in the comments to mean N. maculalis written: "The erroneous definition: sibirialis auct (nec Milliere, 1879)."

05.05.2016 0:17, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57261

Argynnis sp. Most likely, the female Argynnis coredippe

04.05.2016 23:53, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57260

Brenthis daphne?

04.05.2016 23:05, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57265

Melitaea ambigua

04.05.2016 22:39, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57263

Melitaea sutschana , female

03.05.2016 21:13, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57198

I think it's Miltochrista calamina http://www.jpmoth.org/Arctiidae/Lithosiinae/Miltochrista_calamina.htm

03.05.2016 20:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57220

And no female Lycaena dispar ?

03.05.2016 20:19, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57222

I think that here the female Melitaea sutschana

03.05.2016 19:50, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57235

It's not Pieridae. Judging by the black figure, it Melanargia epimede , in halimede it less intense, all narrower sling.

03.05.2016 19:40, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57240

In 37 reg. 5 species of Colias, but hyale absent. I think there male Solias erate poliographus

24.04.2016 17:51, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57141

Boudinotiana notha

24.04.2016 17:51, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57142

Boudinotiana notha

24.04.2016 17:44, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57143

Archiearis parthenias

24.04.2016 16:47, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28738

Yes, I see) In general, the head of the other. A forehead still, in my opinion, not red, and just like in the description dimidiatus - "the forehead, crown and nape dirty cream")

24.04.2016 12:59, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #28738

And perhaps) Sash, I did, too, watched, but more on the Asian sites, and confused color and costal margin - and jpmoth.org, and on the other, for example - http://photozou.jp/photo/show/1433095 / 225 721 309. I thought about scoparia, moreover from the neighboring region - nipponalis or mandschurica..No now look - very similar to the pattern dimidiatus.

24.04.2016 12:04, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #57103

Well, yes, because of the color and put a "?") These are not met. But perhaps here it is in the colors of the images went into the blue, leaf something bluish, too, can be strong in the shadows was shot? ..

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.