Pages: 1 ...3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11... 52
Euroctis niphonis (on Asian sites and in V. V. Dubatolov's article in the Amur Zoological Journal V(2), 2013 - Kuromondokuga niphonis)
Most likely mutable Thitarodes variabilis http://catocala.narod.ru/hep01.html and http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?s=d9d492337d8493796568cae5fdc301d3&showtopic=374388&view=findpost&p=1629220
Yura, I don't understand what this " link to a summary of other authors on the European species, and maybe subspecies? How does it fit in with OTHER species?"? I also wrote that Stanislav gave in his article on the designation of the lectotype, the first description of the species epaminondas, taken from the book by G. Lang. Where is it written that this is a European species? Type series are ...
Unfortunately, until the end of August there will be neither "official sources" at hand, nor a normal Internet, so I will write from memory what I remembered when dealing with the views 2 years ago. Jurassic, in nature, it is the shade of the wings and the size that first catches the eye – small yellowish-brown low-contrast epaminondas and larger grayish with a more contrasting pattern of the ...
This is a mistake in spelling the genus, right Soph t a http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acontiinae+Eustrotiinae/Sophta_subrosea.html. In the Catalog edited by Sineva also Soph t a.
This is Ghoria collitoides They are similar to gigantea, differ in the color of the head, gigantea has a yellow head.
Eugene, I ventured to put in inaccurate rosacea. because I have made a note to these frames about the size. If you remember, there were also typical miniatas (in size), I don't think I even took them off, and a few "babies", much smaller than miniata. I took them off so I could sort them out later. I read about the difference in size from V. V. Dubatolov ...
When I examined my summer seaside Archips in detail, I found all 15 images of males + descriptions and almost all (13) of females. The first impression I got yesterday from this photo is that we should look for exactly among these three - dichotomus, fumosus and issikii. But in issikii (it even has A. abietis synonyms), the caterpillars live and feed exclusively in the interwoven fir needles (in ...
Matov A. Yu. (ZIN RAS) confirmed the definition. More precisely, he wrote that it is Lacanobia amurensis. I didn't find this type on our site, but here http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Lacanobia_Amurensis found to be a synonym for Lacanobia aliena
Matov A. Yu. (ZIN RAS) confirmed the definition of this and 3 subsequent (#49047, #49048 and #49049) images Acronicta major
Apamea sordens Determined by Matov A. Yu. (ZIN RAS) Figured out the differences in the reniform spot (the border of the reniform spot in sordens and indistinctly traced in pabulatricula)and, in addition, pabulatricula has a black stroke on the blurred brown.a field that connects internal and external fields. bandages.
Already tried to figure it out after the discussion here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46350, but no response yet(
Sasha can be transferred to the form. Yesterday this photo VA Kirpichnikova already received a reply confirming the determination.
And what are confused, Sash? It has long wanted to write here to support Yurino definition forget (reconsidered the entire family, all females, no one else with the top like and do not. Ruslan and pafiya others. For females andiomeny characterized by a vast dark pattern and a white spot at the apex in the background shading. True , AIKurentsov even denied the existence of Argynnis anadyomene on ...
I would say that this is just the top characteristic of the male C. ladonides. And the network has an image, for example http://catocala.narod.ru/lyc0175.html and http://www.lycaenidae.gmxhome.de/Lycaenopsis/Celastrina/celastrina-index.htm would put rather inaccurate to ladonidam. But the differences of male and ladonidy Barkhatova somehow end up not all clear ladonida brighter, pogolubee ...
Here, I think, rather Chrysoteuchia sp. All 3 of 37 Calamotropha registration and another 3 from nearby - others. But the form is hardly possible - and an uncomfortable angle, and a few closely related species differ only in the genital analysis. Here already wrote http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47065.
Sash, I, too, on this type of question has long been hanging since Sinev in the catalog in the comments to mean N. maculalis written: "The erroneous definition: sibirialis auct (nec Milliere, 1879)."
I think it's Miltochrista calamina http://www.jpmoth.org/Arctiidae/Lithosiinae/Miltochrista_calamina.htm
It's not Pieridae. Judging by the black figure, it Melanargia epimede , in halimede it less intense, all narrower sling.
Yes, I see) In general, the head of the other. A forehead still, in my opinion, not red, and just like in the description dimidiatus - "the forehead, crown and nape dirty cream")
And perhaps) Sash, I did, too, watched, but more on the Asian sites, and confused color and costal margin - and jpmoth.org, and on the other, for example - http://photozou.jp/photo/show/1433095 / 225 721 309. I thought about scoparia, moreover from the neighboring region - nipponalis or mandschurica..No now look - very similar to the pattern dimidiatus.