Pages: 1
It turns out all the same Zabrus aurichalceus - only apparently it is not here in the list of species http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/georgif3.htm det. E. Komarov
On Molbiol, it was assumed that this is Zygaena filipendulae. Здесь: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&view=findpost&p=1637583
Molbiol identified it as Cryptocephalus from the concolor group. Здесь: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1637719
On Molbiol, it was assumed that this is Zabrus chalceus or Zabrus aurichalceus. Здесь: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1637719
On Molbiol, it was assumed that this is Selatosomus caucasicus. Обсуждение здесь: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1637719 http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1637844 http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1637859
I could help with the barbels. At least put the names in order. In accordance with http://cerambycidae.org
I accidentally noticed it. In Stenurella, all species except samai and sennii should have their authors in parentheses. http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/Stenurella-Villiers-1974
I think that it Stenocorus amurensis , other such stenocorus on DV like as not. http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/amurensis-%28Kraatz-1879%29
By the way already zine site has a pdf of this book: http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/danm14lz.htm
By the way he obscurior and Danilevsky, and http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/wojtylai-Hilszczanski-and-Bystrowski-2005 site
Yes, taxonomy - it's the sort of thing always something changing tolerated. I decided for myself to be guided in the taxonomy of barbels on Danilevsky. But yet I have had no need to deal with barbels from abroad. I think it is right to build on the source, where more or less fully represented the entire world fauna.
Well, that's fine, given that the sights on the world fauna of insects. Together in quietly will adjust.