Pages: 1 ...318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326... 628
Peter, I do not understand what there kollazhik draw. I mean, you can just substantively discuss the numbers of photos. Or do something else waiting for? Drew plate as an example. Just a person perceives the information not as a string, ielook at the photos does not slide in line with the text, and if you do not start to allocate one line, it is likely that the user will not even notice them. ...
Different people need different sample. And another opportunity to hurt nobody. As for the technical part - the sample well subspecies check glitches in the binding. Imprecisely to the genus and family can be exactly the same as before the species. Like, that's the kind of, but not 100% sure.Not with regards to the theme - as I wrote above, the tree taxa need to rectify, this is no argument ...
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 31—39 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → July, August.
Just now some changes appointment of the second line ("Update"). Now, to write: 1. Shapes, morphs, etc. (as before) 2.Subspecies only if the site is not yet wound up appropriate subspecies, and therefore it is impossible to snap a photo directly (before the subspecies does not tied, so always wrote subtypes, regardless of whether the desired site). Do you agree?
But who and how will note that they are different species? Prog, after all, is unknown, different or not they are different. She knows only that the determination to superspecies taxon, not to the species, and it adds an automatic "sp".
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Male / Artem Strizhov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Male / Artem Strizhov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Palaearctic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 44—47 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → July.
Corrected data. Not identified → Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Callopistria argyrosticta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 35—40 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → July, August, September.
It depends on who will confuse you. Even with a dead head. I suspect you're not with anyone. And I don't know anything about the experience of detecting Johnsonbl4 tracks, so I ask a question. It will be a pity if suddenly a caterpillar is released from humanistic motives on the wrong plant and it will bend there. It's better to play it safe.