Insecta.pro Community

08.02.2015 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14058

Double- and stands there (did not see it). Sign like this one))))

08.02.2015 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22107

Corrected data. Imago → Male & female.

08.02.2015 14:55, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #38913

With regard to these two types of primarily I want to say that to compare this image with images from the network completely useless if they show European Eno and Daphne. Both species are very volatile (especially strong geography.volatility looks Brenthis ino, is celebrated by all the authors, since Kurentsova) Therefore, you can only compare sub-species, particularly common in the region of ...

08.02.2015 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38912

I decided to put this as a striking example of sexual dimorphism (variation) of the representatives of the same species.

08.02.2015 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #28756

Corrected data.

07.02.2015 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #2933

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

07.02.2015 9:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38889

Corrected data. Not identified → Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.02.2015 9:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38888

Corrected data. Not identified → Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.02.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38892

Corrected data. Not identified → Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

06.02.2015 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35415

Micronia aculeata?

06.02.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35399

Corrected data. Not identified → Spirama helicina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.02.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35400

Corrected data. Not identified → Spirama helicina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.02.2015 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Damophila alcyonipennella

Yuri, born Damophila very valid, That I suffered representatives of this kind of precast kind Coleophora. It was a glitch. Something Peter did not complete. :))

06.02.2015 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #38595

Well, as there was Stas))) ???

05.02.2015 18:55, Alexander Belousov: comment on photo #38871

And I, of zhe.Somneniya there, but still I think it is closer to Limenitis helmanni duplicata f. pryeri . This, too, with a wide sash, and more reddish than Limenitis doerriesi.

05.02.2015 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38876

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Aporia crataegi / Confidently identified / Male & female / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38873

Corrected data. Not identified → Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38874

Corrected data. Not identified → Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38875

Corrected data. Not identified → Nymphalis xanthomelas / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #36175

Corrected data.

05.02.2015 6:51, Yuri Semejkin: comment on photo #38865

Looked Alexander! In general, if you look at 37 the region, I am at your option P. cultralis amurensis (Romanoff, 1887). Dr. Nearby alternatives I would call P. ussurialis (Bremer, 1864), know a few tops priostrёnnye lane. KRL. The nature of the bond of slightly different, the general background of KRL. . So that will have to delete it. If we take al. Similar features of both species, they ...

04.02.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27092

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

04.02.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #27105

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

04.02.2015 18:13, Vladimir Deryabin: comment on photo #38836

No, it's the only shot.

04.02.2015 17:45, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #38847

_semi_argus :)

04.02.2015 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38846

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Plebejus optilete / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2015 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38844

Corrected data. Not identified → Limenitis sydyi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38842

Corrected data. → Neptis rivularis.

04.02.2015 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #38817

Down with this. tin-plate

03.02.2015 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33691

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

03.02.2015 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38841

Corrected data. Not identified → Minois dryas / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

02.02.2015 18:50, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38820

This species is identified correctly.

02.02.2015 18:50, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38819

This species is identified correctly.

02.02.2015 8:19, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38834

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

02.02.2015 8:17, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38833

Corrected data. Not identified → Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

02.02.2015 2:36, Mikhail F. Bagaturov: comment on Systematic list of Palearctic Woodcock Beetles (genus Lethrusscopoli, 1777)

WELL, this is a further topic of work

01.02.2015 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38818

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna turca / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 20:25, John-ST: comment on Classification

  http://coleop123.narod.ru/syst2.htmlА почему верблюдки и большекрылые подотряды сетчатокрылых, вроде они уже давно самостоятельные отряды?И на фото для верблюдок не Inocellia crassicornis, а кто-то из Raphidiidae, на птеростигме хорошо видна ...

01.02.2015 17:29, Shapik: comment on Vitaliy Nikolaevich Tanasiychuk passed away

Bright memory.

01.02.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #21203

Corrected data. Not identified → Idaea macrospila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38794

Corrected data. Not identified → Diarsia canescens / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2015 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38807

Corrected data. Not identified → Catocala promissa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 13:04, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3802

Corrected data. Xanthorhoe biriviata / Vasiliy Feoktistov → Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata / Basil Sergienko.

31.01.2015 20:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: comment on photo #38630

This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Earias flavida

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

31.01.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38803

Igor, I remind you that I do not associate in groups of butterflies for users on a permanent basis, and only bug fixes. Therefore, I ask you to associate your own custom groups :)

31.01.2015 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38802

Corrected data.

31.01.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Narosa concinna

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.

31.01.2015 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #38793

Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna grandis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #38798

The 18th of January bore definition Irina vaguely remembered that somewhere already seen this vredina :) And finally he found himself in the bins .....

Nihonogomphus ruptus Selys, 1858

Gomphidae

Phratora laticollis (Suffrian, 1851)

Chrysomelidae

Atalopedes campestris (Boisduval, 1852)

Hesperiidae

Lejogaster tarsata Meigen, 1822

Syrphidae

Stagmomantis carolina Johannson, 1763

Mantidae