Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 2
Released work Pekarsky, Oleg. 2016. Taxonomic notes on the Lygephila vulcanea (Butler, 1881) species-group (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Toxocampinae). Zootaxa 4121 (1): 95-100. I came out, who are interested.
I believe that in this photo lupina. On account of the fact that I "certainly know better" - any day out my new article on vulcanea-group in which the issues of these two closely related species, detail and understands all the vicissitudes of nomenclature associated with them. Let's see, discuss :)
For a number of signs that instance should be defined as lupina (= mirabilis).
This butterfly belongs to the genus Bryoleuca.
Today Bryoleuca schitiaetsya come on par with Bryophila. Not I started:) Scythobrya same genus, rather than a subgenus.
Blepharita amica ussuriensis Sheljuzhko, 1919
Oligonyx vulnerata (Butler, 1878)
Cucullia artemisiae
lucifuga
Lacanobia contigua
lucifuga
Hypobarathra icterias (Eversmann, 1843)
Yet there is such a possibility.
1948 dates back to the work of which is described in the form. In Kononenko scoop Korea (1998, 2007) - koreaEplexia Bryk, 1948. On the attributive type label in 1992 with his hand written - koreaplexia (likely meh.oshibka). I do not have at hand Brik see the original spelling.
It can be ambigua
Yes, it is Euplexia japonica Leech, 1889. There are some cool species in your region!
Euxoa temera
Cucullia lucifuga
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Conistra veronicae (Hübner, [1813])
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
Peridroma saucia (Hübner, 1808)
Limacodidae sp.
Hadena magnolii
Apopestes indica Moore, 1883
S. verbasci
S. verbasci
S. verbasci
S. verbasci
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
This species is identified correctly.
is not gamma
This A. buraetica:))
This species is identified correctly.
Yes, I would have suggested Egira anatolica.
Most likely S. chamomillae.
A. clavis, without a doubt.
Pakurs unsuitable for determination. Yet it lucifuga.
Yes, it is C. algae
It Cucullia lactucae.
There lutsefuge another photo that instance remains.
It Cucullia lactucae.
stenibergmani Bryk, 1941 a good, independent, separate from militaris views. This was shown in the publication Oleg Pekarsky (2014) Contribution to the knowledge of Noctuidae fauna of Bering island. FIBIGERIANA SUPPLEMENT: VOLUME 2. 177-200 pp. color plates 299-304 pp. It must be removed from the subspecies militaris. So stenibergmani independent type with one synonymous - Rhyacia stenibergmani ...
If used without the name of the species kinds, then with the title - Atalanta butterfly or a butterfly Proserpine. In combination with the generic, with a small - Vanessa Atalanta. Raza there?
And I wanted to show the photos Frosya wide range of readers:) By the way proper name is spelled with a capital letter.
mirabilis Bryk, 1948 sinonimizirovan with Lygephila lupina (Graeser, 1890) in 2014. Pekarsky O (2014) Taxonomic studies of the Lygephila lubrica (Freyer, 1842) species complex with notes on other species in the genus (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Toxocampinae). ZooKeys 452: 107-129. doi: 10.3897 / zookeys.452.8152
News
- 31.10.2024: The website contains English translations (if needed) of most Community/Forum messages
- 24.10.2024: The forum structure has been reworked. New sections have been added, and many topics have been moved to them
- 22.10.2024: Some photo descriptions have been corrected, and incorrect group bindings have been fixed
New photos (05.11.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 11:08, A. Ponomarev: Петр нет таксона Bembidion (Notaphu...
- 21:13, P. Khramov: Most of the non-English comments an...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- Grizzly vs. moths, BBC vs. grizzly
