Pages: 1 ...301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309... 629
Thank you, Basil! This year I have not always pointed out to me who and where defined. Therefore I never found.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Calliteara pudibunda / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Melitaea athalia / Confidently identified / Male & female / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
To put in Melanthia mandschuricata (Bremer, 1864), both in the Catalog Sinev, but there were doubts as We have more Mesoleuca mandschuricata (Bremer, 1864) http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/60938 Clearly, this is one kind of double and must be removed. And doubt, because there are both http://www.catocala.narod.ru/geom94.html and http://olegberlov.narod.ru/geom94.html. How true?
The taxons were merged. Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis and Chamaesphecia tenthrediniformis were merged.
Corrected data. Not identified → Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Irina, thank you. Clear. Just the place did not seem to me like the way, so I'm not such a hypothesis put forward. :)
For bugs (and all other) in the form of load: Perspective: top, bottom, side, front. When information about adding a for bugs (or maybe all) 1. Food specialization (better course, trophic characteristics, but not all will probably clear) separately imago larva individually.And you can advance the goal the whole set of options (phytophages zoophages, saprophages, coprophagic, Antofagasta ...
I admit that it is derived from the fact that the author still has the ability to edit for a while in his lux, and at this time his picture are determined and transferred. Then it was loaded on the fly-defined types except Scarabs (these comrades photo in most cases only to roll) and wait until the morning I did not.Admit it: simply unacceptable luxury in this case "do tomorrow what you can do ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Stenichneumon militarius / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.
Well, "rose of Carcharota", of course, in the subject. It may not be predatory, or even insect-like, but it's easy to bleed. How are the poppies doing?"Who are you talking about? What kind of power? Karakurtikha or something? But why on earth did it get furry? Or is it a projection of your erotic fantasies? I'd rather have a girlfriend.That's why there are no dead fish in my steppe. But its ...