Insecta.pro Community

08.01.2014 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on And that's why in such a situation not hochut play videos?

Well no. With standard subtitles all the rules. But when the movie subtitle is not complete, but there are some thread somewhere in the vast web, then they can be out of sync. If you absolutely do not sync, pause, and so different - Then it is all right, God bless him. But often the situation when during the whole movie the subtitles are lagging behind, say, for a couple of seconds.Usually it is ...

07.01.2014 20:19, AGG: comment on

  Жаль только, что далеко не столь свежие ревизии по Aphthona и Longitarsus никто никуда в открытую не выкладывает...а они есть? дай ссылку на название, а там может и нароем

07.01.2014 17:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #25962

Corrected data. Not identified → Apamea sordens / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #26114

Corrected data. → Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #26091

Corrected data. → Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #26070

Corrected data. → Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:43, Svetlana Shchavelina: comment on photo #23541

Hidari irava?

07.01.2014 14:46, Zoran Bozovic: comment on photo #25952

Thank You!!!

07.01.2014 14:42, Zoran Bozovic: comment on photo #26060

Yes, sorry, 66 years, brain chocked!

07.01.2014 14:11, Zoran Bozovic: comment on photo #26097

Thank You, Sir.

07.01.2014 11:03, AGG: comment on

я точно рехнусь с этими бабочками. вроде, всё отсортировал, но пока вчера фотографировал ещё 3! вида обнаружил 36 ? Eupseudosoma ? aberrans37 ? Eupseudosoma sp может просто самка того же вида Сообщение было отредактировано AGG - 07.01.2014 11:31

07.01.2014 2:58, Peter Khramov: comment on Dysphania ares

Thanks for the tip, fixed.

07.01.2014 2:57, Peter Khramov: comment on Itame chinensis

Thank corrected.

07.01.2014 2:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Asovia maeoticaria

Thanks, fixed.

07.01.2014 2:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #14147

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

07.01.2014 2:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #10309

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

07.01.2014 2:55, Peter Khramov: comment on Dyscia conspersaria

Thank corrected.

07.01.2014 2:53, Peter Khramov: comment on Chloroclysta siterata

Thanks for the tip, corrected.

07.01.2014 2:52, Peter Khramov: comment on Eupithecia biornata

The photo Pasiphila debiliata, as an illustration of this type of error remained. Thanks for the tip.

07.01.2014 2:35, Peter Khramov: comment on Help to get some dried specimens of micromoths in Gelechiidae and other families

Comments only now translated from the English version (Lepidoptera.pro), so lift it higher.

07.01.2014 0:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26659

Corrected data. Igor Sakhno → Sergey Didenko.

06.01.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26637

Corrected data. Igor Sakhno → Sergey Didenko.

06.01.2014 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26629

Corrected data. Igor Sakhno → Svyatoslav Knyazev.

06.01.2014 0:37, Jan van Holten: comment on photo #6784

This species is identified correctly.

06.01.2014 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26528

Please make a note about who exactly said that on molbiol as many of the molbiol folks (including your humble servant) also author here. Will be easier to move :)

05.01.2014 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10037

Corrected data. Pupa → Larva.

05.01.2014 18:10, Igor Sakhno: comment on photo #26634

Whoah, what a merry villica!

05.01.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #25638

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

05.01.2014 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11769

Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11768

Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11767

Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11741

Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11740

Corrected data. Neozephyrus japonicus → Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26113

Corrected data. Spodoptera exigua / Zoran Bozovic → Acronicta rumicis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.01.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26523

Corrected data. / → Smerinthus ocellata / Igor Sakhno.

03.01.2014 17:20, Igor Sakhno: comment on photo #26494

Rhyparia amurensis. Maybe there is some more adequate its name.

03.01.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26491

Label?

03.01.2014 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26439

Corrected data. Euplagia quadripunctaria / Zoran Bozovic → Opisthograptis luteolata / Igor Sakhno.

03.01.2014 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Proposals for moderating photos.

I want to make an offer to the poster that you should write the exact species names when uploading photos to the site. For example: Hypomecis punctinalis is written that way, and not punctialis ; Chloroclystis v-ata is written with a hyphen, and not v ata .Compliance with these rules you will greatly facilitate the work of the moderators so as photos with the misspelled Latin names are ...

03.01.2014 2:57, Zoran Bozovic: comment on photo #26388

This should be Hypomecis punctinalis!?

03.01.2014 2:25, Zoran Bozovic: comment on photo #25917

You are right. My mistake!

02.01.2014 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26307

Corrected data. Male → Female.

02.01.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Daddala brevicauda

Peter, it is necessary to correct the name of the species Daddala brevicauda Wileman & South; Holloway, 1976 to Daddala brevicauda (Wileman & South, 1921) some confusion in the network with it, that's messed up.

02.01.2014 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26235

Now only Petr can correct this.

02.01.2014 19:47, Eddy Verfaillie: comment on Thera variata

Following external caracteristics, there is no possibility to make a difference between variata and britannica. For the males, there is a difference in the antennae, only visible after enlargement. Otherwise, only genital examination can give a definite answer.

02.01.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26248

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

02.01.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26222

There is no such author in the website list, so I can't put him as identifier from outside. Such are the rules, Andrey, there's sadly nothing to do. The author of the pic can add a comment to this photo with the name of the identifier.

02.01.2014 15:49, Ozgur Kocak: comment on photo #15555

Need underside of the wings.

02.01.2014 15:48, Ozgur Kocak: comment on photo #15824

Also underside needed.

02.01.2014 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #26232

Grounds here: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=177650

Tropidomantis tenera Stal, 1858

Iridopterygidae

Stagmatoptera binotata Scudder, 1869

Mantidae

Choeradodis rhombicollis Latreille, 1833

Mantidae

Stagmatoptera supplicaria Burmeister, 1838

Mantidae

Nemobius sylvestris Bosc, 1792

Trigonidiidae