Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589... 629

11.02.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5068

To go.

11.02.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5033

Photo moved.

11.02.2011 14:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5062

Shot moved.

11.02.2011 14:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5489

Moved then.

11.02.2011 13:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5008

Photo goes to P. goeldii.

11.02.2011 12:43, B2B: comment on I offer a job on spreading insects

Don't jump to conclusions about what you may not understand. Be patient, sit, wait - there are a lot of people on the forum and, if your offer is worth something, you will find it. And in passing (just because one or two people disagree with you in a sharp form) to water everyone ... no need.I apologize if I offended anyone. Not out of spite...It's just that the views of the employer and ...

11.02.2011 9:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Satyrium spini

View transferred from generation to generation Satyrium Nordmannia.

11.02.2011 9:28, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Satyrium esculi

View transferred from generation to generation Satyrium Nordmannia.

11.02.2011 9:21, : comment on Satyrium acaciae

View transferred from generation to generation Satyrium Nordmannia.

10.02.2011 23:39, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #4640

Not clearly seen, so it has "uncertain" status...

10.02.2011 23:38, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #1543

There we can see antennas from outside are slightly colored red. Anyway, Vlad saw more (shooting or even catching), if identified it like this. ;)

10.02.2011 23:35, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #2077

Just for the record: what should be considered that is butterfly's antennas from outside (even though usually it's hardly seen just the smallest part at the end of an antenna). Lineola has dark ones, sylvestris does red. And the sawyere is colored more or less similarly, males have red or something like, females do dark. Also, males can be easily identified by stigmas.

10.02.2011 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4966

Ok, synonym added then. Meant, this... God, genetic combination.

10.02.2011 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4965

Moved to P. phyllides.

10.02.2011 21:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5449

Uh-oh... I'm dummie. Moving.

10.02.2011 18:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5529

Boris, thanks for approving. Photo moved.

10.02.2011 17:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5051

Shot goes.

10.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5015

Ok, if male, so male...

10.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4989

Moved then.

10.02.2011 17:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4971

Moved.

10.02.2011 17:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5024

Ok, moved. Dear approving gentlemen, please, approve also the very identifying, if it's successful, right after species, for me to move it finally...

10.02.2011 9:50, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5102

Tatyana! This one was identified by Evgeny Tsvetkov (Saint Petersburg), who always identifies all my Geometridae. As far as I know, his suggestions are reliable enough. And he always doubts openly.

10.02.2011 9:02, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #5100

This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 8:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #5088

This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 8:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #5095

This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Spilosoma urticae

Pay attention to the basic white tendrils. It is on this basis form of visually distinguishable from Spilosoma lubricipeda Linnaeus, 1758

10.02.2011 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #5083

This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 0:40, Peter Khramov: comment on New pictures of Eugene Komarov and Basil Feoktistov

A friendly wave with photos tails pakemony mustache tightened in capes and hussars. Wellcome to the gallery ...

09.02.2011 23:08, Peter Khramov: comment on Published another 243 photos

Yevgeny Komarov, gave birth to a list of transfer, respectively, I have now moved them. If someone suddenly noticed any mistakes in these families - reported.

09.02.2011 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2588

Will upload tomorrow (think I have some in a collection).

09.02.2011 22:40, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4187

Agree!

09.02.2011 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Diachrysia chrysitis

It is time for these types of scatter. Diachrysia chrysitis there is only one # 4187 The rest are Diachrysia stenochrysis Warren, 1913 (the kind created and approved).

09.02.2011 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5081

Photo moved.

09.02.2011 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5058

Shot moved to "identified successfully".

09.02.2011 18:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5006

Moved and activated.

09.02.2011 18:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5025

Moved.

09.02.2011 18:00, Peter Khramov: comment on Fixed vspylvayuschie inscriptions Gallery

Pop label (shown if Hovering the cursor over the photo) for some images displayed incorrectly. Now the situation is corrected - you can see the Latin name or a message stating that the form of the butterfly in the photo is not defined.

09.02.2011 12:45, Dmitrii Musolin: comment on Auchenorrhyncha recording scheme

THE LAUNCH OF THE NEW WEBSITE FOR: THE AUCHENORRHYNCHA RECORDING SCHEMEThe new website <http://www.ledra.co.uk> was launched today.Please have a look. Comments and suggestions are always welcomed. Thenew-style newsletter can be downloaded directly from the home page of thewebsite.Best wishes, Alan StewartNewsletters of the site-brother in bedbugs (http://www.hetnews.org.uk/) they turned out ...