Pages: 1 ...68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76... 627
Corrected data. Not identified → Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Scarabaeus typhon (Fischer von Waldheim, 1823) → Scarabaeus (Scarabaeus) typhon (Fischer von Waldheim, 1823).
Corrected data. Scarabaeus transcaspicus Stolfa, 1938 → Scarabaeus (Scarabaeus) transcaspicus Stolfa, 1938.
Corrected data. Scarabaeus laticollis Linnaeus, 1767 → Scarabaeus (Ateuchetus) laticollis Linnaeus, 1767.
Corrected data. Malachius bipustulatus (Linnaeus, 1758) → Malachius (Malachius) bipustulatus (Linnaeus, 1758).
Corrected data. Anthocomus equestris (Fabricius, 1781) → Anthocomus (Celidus) equestris (Fabricius, 1781).
This photo should be deleted immediately. The photo shows a spider, and the site is dedicated to insects. !Spiders are not considered insects. This is a completely different class of invertebrates! An insect can be distinguished from all other invertebrates by the number of legs. All of them, without exception, have 6 and none more. It can be smaller (if you tear it off):)
I'm watching the movie "Paradise Lake" right now... In the wilderness on the shore sits a boy of non-Russian appearance and sketches a caterpillar sitting in a bank. Next to it is a long-handled net and another jar. A couple approaches him and asks, " Boy, did you come here on your bike? (the bike is standing nearby) - The boy is silent. "Who do you draw?" "My mother doesn't let me talk to ...
Corrected data. Micrencaustes lunulata (MacLeay, 1825) → Micrencaustes (Micrencaustes) lunulata (MacLeay, 1825).
Corrected data. Micrencaustes taiwana Araki & Shibatani, 1941 → Micrencaustes (Mimencaustes) taiwana Araki & Shibatani, 1941.
Corrected data. Micrencaustes acridentata Li & Ren, 2006 → Micrencaustes (Mimencaustes) acridentata Li & Ren, 2006.
Beetle exactly, but this photo is difficult to understand even the family. And why only the bottom view? It is extremely doubtful that he could have bitten at all, the oral apparatus is clearly not the same system. Maybe he gave out some caustic secret? But it could hardly have been anything like an electric shock. Are you even sure that you were bitten (or stung)? not someone else? For example, ...