Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129... 145

12.04.2011 2:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8166

Moved.

12.04.2011 2:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8190

Moved.

12.04.2011 2:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8178

To go.

11.04.2011 22:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8378

Nooo. If that was question "what's this?", there should have been something between "this" and" the number of the shot (not just space), say, dash.

11.04.2011 21:52, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8378

Hm, thought it over for serious before realized that you meant "this species" instead of "this shot". Meh...

11.04.2011 12:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8378

To go.

11.04.2011 12:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8487

Ok then, moved.

10.04.2011 18:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8397

I may lack of the statistic of website users and their needs, but certainly 0.75 is more true. Anyway, you have a point that it's always better to have as much info as possible. Nevertheless, without location map it's not so handy yet...

10.04.2011 17:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8361

This is my blunder, I published not noticing that it was already applied to a species, even signed. Will move it right now.

10.04.2011 15:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8397

As for null value, you overdid for sure ;--) In this website it can never have a null value, and it will be more reasonable to mention shot/caught location when it will be possible at last to mark location at a map (I'll working out it right now).

08.04.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7232

Moved too. Sorry, that not at the time.

08.04.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7249

Moved.

08.04.2011 11:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8280

Moved.

08.04.2011 11:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8281

Moved.

05.04.2011 17:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7696

Moved/activated.

05.04.2011 17:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8266

Yeah, right, but in this case it should be identified but named differently (at the personal page). Whatever.

05.04.2011 15:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8266

Weird that was named in comments and not moved to "identified"... Moved.

05.04.2011 15:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8265

That's pretty weird that already named in comments was not moved to "identified"...

05.04.2011 10:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7696

Gentlemen moderators, approve, please...

04.04.2011 21:47, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6484

Ok, moved. Alexandr, add synonym, please, if you're sure it has point. Ok?

04.04.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7046

Ok then, moved.

04.04.2011 18:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6484

Guys, database the species, please.

04.04.2011 18:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7046

Guys, what about this species is not yet databased, huh?

04.04.2011 12:05, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8271

That was about "better" or "worse"?

04.04.2011 12:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7013

Moved.

04.04.2011 12:02, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7696

Guys, add species, please...

01.04.2011 11:01, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7696

Sum up, that's it or not?

31.03.2011 1:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8271

Look at the original photo there: http://lepidoptera.pro/8271.jpg. Height was 769 pix, so it had to be a little bit cut. Basically, he checked "No to any retouching" box, so I just cut it and got small photo, no more. For the large photo I used a new software, so there should be no blunders, and for small one I did old, so that can be somehow wrongly scaled.

31.03.2011 0:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8027

Well, ok then, no fuss. Variety sounds cool.

30.03.2011 21:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7981

Moved.

30.03.2011 21:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8271

Evgeny, do you mean 320 pixel shot or large size?

30.03.2011 14:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7981

Nobody is against. I'm just trying to realize if it should get "identified successfully" status or "uncertain".

30.03.2011 14:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7982

Thanks, moving.

30.03.2011 13:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7981

Evgeny, identified or uncertain?

30.03.2011 12:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8027

Must be Igor, cause users can add only their own images... Let's not limit ourselves to photos only, but if there will be many pictures, we'll think about how to improve search to find only photos or pictures separatedly.

30.03.2011 1:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6387

Moved and activated.

30.03.2011 1:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8027

Yeah, not by photos alone.

29.03.2011 0:09, Peter Khramov: comment on

Dmitry, synonyms do not forget to write down when the view out subspecies (now I added uzho).

27.03.2011 21:38, Peter Khramov: comment on Archaeoattacus edwardsii

Thanks for the tip, changed.

25.03.2011 13:37, Peter Khramov: comment on Apatura schrenckii

Yes, in this sense, no rest from biology there. Keep all change, driven into subtypes and back, a nightmare, no permanent normal system. I do not know, at any directory on the site of great anguish with the system than the biological.

25.03.2011 13:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7696

Roman, what a teasing mood you are always in ;--))

24.03.2011 20:38, Peter Khramov: comment on Apatura schrenckii

Fixed on the elm, I have long pointed out this mistake, but seen in the data pereeksporte it surfaced again. Hmelegrab, if I remember correctly, was taken from reprints Lampert, but now it is not at hand, so I can not say for sure. Moreover, the original 1913 contains general Ostrya.

24.03.2011 20:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7046

Photos nearby are too?

24.03.2011 11:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6484

So what, move to Epatolmis caesarea or? P. S. Imho is an abbreviation IMHO, stands for "in my humble opinion".

24.03.2011 11:21, Peter Khramov: comment on Limenitis camilla

Yes, not only the European part, but just a part of Europe. All data on the site are based on the principle "if indicated, that is," and not on the principle of "if not specified, no."