Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139... 141
Goes from "undetermined" to Eupithecia centaureata.
Summary - to Polyommatus?
Hmm. And what is the conclusion ...
Do I understand that all the synonyms available now online ornithopter designated as the troidesy Now, you can safely carry a ptitsekrylkam?
Tatyana, Vlad, thanks. Moved to X. ferrugata, "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Updated.
Apparently, a typo. Corrected.
Comment moved to photo, photo did to Drasteria picta.
Note moved to the 8918 photo.
Shot moved.
Comments postponed to 3909 photos.
Comments moved to the species description page.
Still "uncertain".
Moved then.
Moved.
Moved to "uncertain" then.
Eugene, online infa Troides taken it with funeta.
In the same 9000 in the area of Google results Ornithoptera priamus and in the 6000 Troides priamus. Outside, of course, stupid, but still in the original version with Troides for this kind does not pull ... or what?
Updated.
Terrific.
Moved.
Moved.
Any suggestions more?
Ok, corrected.
Alexander did not quite understand what links? To add. information?
Alexandr, thanks for identifying. Photo moved.
Continue talking of subspecies: now one can get subspecies info only at species description pages, reading descriptions or comments (as Dmitry and Alexandr have been adding such comments). But one can't tell looking at the image if there is any subspecies info or not (if subspecies was specified at all). I think, that now there is no need in individual subspecies pages. Nevertheless, we should ...
Last Dmitry Podjogin comment moved to the species description page.
Caucasus removed.
Updated.
Ok then, thanks, updated.
Dmitry, this is the same: maybe I have a photo with its underside, but of another butterfly. Will specify later.
Ok, moved to activated species. Anyway, that's pretty weird why some species with info given are not activated...
Moved to M. dryas.
Moved.
As far as I can remember, this was shot in some museum abroad where it was put in a glass box. So no underside and maybe label too. I will check it later, look through original pics, maybe find something more eloquent.
Moved.
As for classifying, yes, there is to be, subspecies will be classified somehow. Now we've got lack of its info and sometimes also of photos. For instance, this very nephelus is depicted there only once (ok, there is one more photo to publish). More info = better and properer subspecies classifying. Any ideas? Let's have a brainstorm, but please, in another topic.
Back to "identified successfully".
Subspecies had been already removed. Signed "male".
Meh, my vote plus.
Cool photo even though not ideal from a technical point of view.
Yes, folks are so active these days about identifying, so as there are not so many "undetermined" left to identify, even with January extras...
Moved to "uncertain".
#3000 moved to "uncertain".
Goes to ferula, "uncertain".
Species added, photo moved.
Glitch fixed.
New species and genus added, photo moved. Also, my congrats to having such a gem ;--)
News
If you are not Molbiol user, just ignore the message below:
Пользователи Молбиола, перейдите на русскую версию сайта, чтобы прочесть об интеграции Инсекты с энтомологической частью Молбиола и о копировании форума на Инсекту.
- 22.05.2024: Еще одна цветовая схема
- 14.05.2024: Выложен первый полностью функциональный раздел перенесенного форума
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
New photos (28.06.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 13:21, P. Khramov: Александр, обратите внимание, здесь...
- 23:54, A. Dymchenko: Всем привет! Попробую впервые вылож...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
