Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83... 145

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20290

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20289

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20287

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20286

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20291

Goes to.

28.01.2013 0:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #16644

Yury, why not to talk this over on the very species photo page or on the taxon one? The final info may be added to species descriptions what's already enabled as a feature. In case this doesn't seem convenient, what will be better then? Let's consider and I'm ready to make necessary changes.

28.01.2013 0:54, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2007

Thanks, moved.

28.01.2013 0:53, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8953

Moved to "undetermined".

28.01.2013 0:51, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20221

Moved to L. capitella "uncertain".

26.01.2013 17:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8956

Any thoughts, to "uncertain" or what?

25.01.2013 18:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20168

Goes to "identified successfully".

25.01.2013 18:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20283

Thanks for the confirmation, moved.

25.01.2013 18:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11308

Andrey, Sciota rhenella has photos of different specimen?

25.01.2013 18:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20302

Moved.

25.01.2013 18:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20303

Goes to.

25.01.2013 11:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #16644

Yury, why not to pose questions from amateurs to pros right now, what does the website lack?

24.01.2013 2:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8751

Photo moved. To correct Alexandr's reply: for uncertain IDs there is a special checkbox (Species is identified) "Tentatively" to mark, or if you seriously doubt then just note the ID with a question sign in the "author's comment" field. But this doubt may be different, especially when someone else took part in the ID, from molbiol.ru for one...

24.01.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6273

Nearly two years passed and the moth has already become a citizen.

24.01.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #8745

Guys, thanks for the ID. Photo moved.

24.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #20242

Also this: if you can identify no more than genus or any higher taxon, please note that as "author's comment". This kind of taxa will be used later, not now.