Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84... 144

16.01.2013 19:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #11077

Goes to.

16.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18464

Sent you an e-mail.

16.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #17247

Moved.

16.01.2013 19:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18524

Thanks, moved.

16.01.2013 16:07, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7435

By the way, it's done, two years haven't passed.

16.01.2013 15:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18606

Sergey, you often add photos with the IDs, which yet are not linked with the catalogue species. So if you have some troubles with a field "Species name" on upload or with editing data in your personal account on the website, please e-mail me or create a new post in the Community, and we'll clear the things up.

16.01.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18590

The author identified it right, just didn't manage to link the photo with the ID properly. Just fixed it. Vitaly, such mislinking happens due to you incorrectly write the species name like c album without hyphen whilst the catalogue name actually has hyphen (c-album).

16.01.2013 15:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18569

Dunno if this is athalia, but it doesn't look anyway similar to didyma. Anybody can comment?

16.01.2013 12:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #14581

Oh yes, commented about mistyping and didn't move the photo. I'll do it right now, thanks for the nudge.

15.01.2013 22:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18593

Would like to say it again, it's never bad to confirm the ID. It's not about that the one who identified would have no doubt, but lest other people have any, since those might know nothing of the species, if it's common or not, neither know anything at all.

15.01.2013 22:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18581

To Vitaly and all photographers as well, please let's not add dry specimens two things at once in one photo. This way (easier to compare) is good for guides and home archives, while the photos on the website can be used and selected in many ways, and it's just two clicks for to have two separate pics before the eyes, instead such double photos make the search quite more complicated. So if any of ...

15.01.2013 22:06, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #12654

Any thoughts anyone? olieus or not?

15.01.2013 19:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13781

Goes to Arhopala centaurus just as other photos of the specimen.

15.01.2013 19:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18345

Moved from semiargus to amandus.

15.01.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18314

Moved from phlaeas to dispar.

15.01.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18225

Moved.

15.01.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18229

Goes to.

15.01.2013 19:35, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18220

Moved.

15.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18222

Goes to.

14.01.2013 22:44, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5908

Goes to.

14.01.2013 20:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #18508

I think Vitaly's right about worn-out specimens, they're of need. Extras — see above. As for smaller size photos, let's take time since I've got original size photos for most of them, so one of the future goal is to upload these larger size pics. The thing is that I can't just change the prior photo with a new one, the very files need to be changed whilst the new ones already uploaded with all ...