Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93... 144
Fixed. Monitor might change it, but I did overcorrect this as well.
Suggest to keep it anyway. It looks different from the neighbour images that are actually few.
Moved.
Though this very ssp. seems to belong to Ambulyx bakeri, or what?
Moved to Ambulyx moorei as it's a synonym if I get it right.
Let's wait for Dmitry.
Moved.
Yep.
Ok, moved to Vanessa cardui.
What a green smiley...
Ok, moved.
Incidentally, there's larva in the photo.
Andrey, better to add that new and then remove, isn't it? Since this one illustrates the species...
Updated.
Right, corrected.
So what, guys, any opinions more?
Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14906.
Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14906.
Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14906.
Moved.
To insolita "uncertain" or 50/50?
What's about the location or/and flight time, may these be the key?
Goes to.
Moved.
Goes to "identified successfully".
Maxim, any objections?
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved.
To "identified" then?
Goes to "identified successfully".
Thanks, moved to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
To "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Yury, would you please comment the ID? Since we've got no C. adultera yet...
Moved to "identified successfully".
The author of the photo seems to tend to oversaturate colors, though it also depends on monitor...
Thanks, moved.
Goes to.
Moved to "identified successfully".
The antennae go to "identified successfully".
Moved to Cyclophora pendularia.
Dunno what's the species, but definitely male!
"This is" means the right one or not?
Thanks, moved.
Folks, if you've got something to oppose the ID, please comment. Should be moved at least to "uncertain", such a stunner.
Great. Goes to.
Dmitry, here's the underside: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13923. Is it this or not?
Next page