Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95... 144
Moved to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Removed.
Experts, would you please solve it out?
Thanks, moved.
Thanks for the ID, moved to esmeralda.
Can't this be identified at least up to so-so species?
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved.
Moved.
This species is identified correctly.
"(no underside)"
Evgeny, for these very cases there is a link "Other photos of the species" up on the right, so ;--)
... slightly reminds of a muskox male...
I may be stuffed but wasn't it already there and turned out not to be polydamas? Or it was?
All twisted... Corrected.
Updated.
Corrected.
Updated.
Goes to "identified successfully".
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved.
To argus, "uncertain".
Goes to "uncertain".
Moved to "uncertain" so far.
So what, guys, any approvals?
Added Old pro in September in the table.
Moved.
The spot might be just overlapped with a hind wing as there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/4747.
Ok, moved then.
Moved to "identified successfully".
Moved off the "undetermined".
Anatoly, thanks for the Old. Added October. Soon dolepitsya system of adding text of information, while joint work on updating data on the website will go easier / faster.
The lunar rover moved off the stables to Sitochroa palealis.
Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14894.
Next page