Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92... 145
Goes to.
Moved to "identified successfully".
Corrected.
Moved.
Moved to "undetermined".
Might be confused with http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16104? Is C. thalecti on there? Or what?
Thanks, fixed.
Dmitry, any conclusions?
Maria, have you any shots of its upperside?
Any versions on the moth?
Goes to.
Moved.
Goes to M. didyma.
Moved.
Will move after the species database gets updated.
Moved to "uncertain" just as another photo of this specimen.
Thanks for the hint, gonna fix that bug. P.S. As for the ID, Vlad says genitalia examination needed. Thus, whilst we've got no versions more, move this to "uncertain"...
The photo looks good.
What a valiant guy.
What a background, such a background...
Yury, would like to notice that your shots have been gradually getting better and better, more photo-ish. Keep it up :--) Just you'd better join photos of the same specimen using the mark "Other photos of the same specimen", otherwise it's not always clear to see "empty pupa got from the previous larva".
I'm about the anonymous comment added, not of the ID )
Hm. I wonder how it could ever work that way... Ok, will check it for bugs.
Guys, who left the comment?
Easy for one, hard for another ;--)
Sure, moved.
Moved to Yponomeuta evonymella "uncertain" so far.
Moved to rivularis.
Ok, moved to adippe.
Thanks, goes to.
Goes to.
Ok, move to M. britomartis.
Moved.
Thanks, moved.
Moved.
Any success?
Goes to.
Thanks, moved.
Right, updated.
Moved to pamphilus "uncertain" just as the neighbour photo.
Moved to pamphilus "uncertain".
Still asking.
Moved.
Indeed?
What a thing.
Ok, will be in A. moorei.
Yury, what did you approve, Ambulyx moorei or A. bakeri?
I'll move to the exotics as that gets done.
Will move as the exotics done.
I'll move as the database of exotic species gets done.
Next page