Insecta.pro Community
Filatima djakovica
This species is identified correctly.
Pseudopanthera macularia
Denticollis linearis
Denticollis linearis
Peter all photos that relate to Omosita colon should be transferred to Omosita japonica. Definition Alexey kovalev
Filatima djakovica https://lepiforum.org/wiki/page/Filatima_djakovica female
Filatima djakovica https://lepiforum.org/wiki/page/Filatima_djakovica
Filatima djakovica https://lepiforum.org/wiki/page/Filatima_djakovica
Peter, there is no taxon Bembidion (Notaphus) varium Olivier, 1795
Peter all photos of Aneugmenus padi should be transferred to Aneugmenus fuerstenbergensis. It turned out not so long ago.
Acherontia atropos
Vitaly please pay attention to the legs of sawfly larvae and the legs of Geometridae caterpillars.
This female can be tagged.
This is Megatoma conspersa (Solsky, 1876), it is not listed. Definition Alexey Kovalev
Sawflies don't have legs like that. The head is not a sign.
Geometridae
Geometridae
Geometridae
Geometridae
Ichneumonidae
Tenthredo campestris
Tenthredo campestris
Tenthredo campestris
Tenthredo campestris
This is not Pachyprotasis antennata
Tenthredopsis sp.
Tenthredo sp.
This is not Pachyprotasis antennata you can see the larva that is already Rhogogaster punctulata see here http://insectamo.ru/sawfly/25-pililshchiki/3707-rhogogaster-punctulata
Hartigia linearis=Phylloecus linearis The site already has Phylloecus linearis ( https://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1039182 ) it is necessary to leave something odn
This is definitely not Allantus cingillum photos of the larvae of this species can be viewed here https://guatemala.inaturalist.org/observations/130080632 And in the photo most likely the most common for M. O. Empria candidata
Dorcatoma robusta
Dorcatoma robusta
It is most likely Ropalodontus strandi (Lohse, 1969) "Relatively recently it was shown (Nikitsky, 2005) that the species previously named R. perfopatus (Gyllenhal, 1813) for the central European part of Russia is actually Ropalodontus strandi Lohse, 1969" Excerpt from here ...
Peter this should be moved to Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)
It would also be right to add "Phiaris sp." to this photo.
I think it would be right to put it to Phiaris sp.
Peter it should be moved to Celypha rufana (Scopoli, 1763)
Peter, it is Acleris sp.
And this must be moved to Scythris cuspidella,
This is Scythris cuspidella, it needs to be moved
Cucullia lucifuga
Cucullia lucifuga
Cucullia lucifuga
Based on this, you can easily figure out who is who.
Amphipyra berbera has a red "thorn", while Amphipyra pyramidea has a yellow "thorn". At a young age, the caterpillars are indistinguishable. From this we can draw conclusions.
Peter it is not Stigmella roborella same as the second photo by Zoran Bozovic. He wrote that it is Stigmella basiguttella, but there is a big question. You can compare here https://lepiforum.org/wiki/page/Stigmella_basiguttella
Peter there is a mistake here, most likely it is Lampropteryx suffumata
This photo and the second one of the specimen should be transferred to Sophronia consanguinella (Herrich-Schaffer, 1854)
Peter, this photo should be moved to Bucculatrix humiliella. Identification by Ilya Ustyantsev on Naturalist https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/15903722
News
- 10.12.2024: Новое поле в «Поиске энтомологов»
- 05.12.2024: Insecta.pro maps: filter by taxon
- 30.11.2024: Починена ссылка и страница «Мои подписки»
New photos (20.12.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 23:32, V. Titov: Добрый день, коллеги энтомологи!!! ...
- 12:17, E. Kuzmina: Добрый день, коллеги энтомологи!!! ...
- 22:26, P. Korzhov: Vespa orientalis (шершень вос...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Notes about Phuket Butterfly Garden, Thailand
