Insecta.pro Community
Right, Petr, Sciota rhenella has photos of a different specimen.
Petr, didn't get the q about different speciment. As for Sciota fumella, I rechecked it there after Vlad: http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Sciota_Fumella.
Why, guess this is Udea fulvalis.
Angle isn't great. To "uncertain".
Peter is a glitch Hedya salicella here (on this page) should not be, although Photos Hedya nubiferana it is not.
This one and the next pic seem to be the same specimen.
This is Rhyacionia pinicolana as well, check Rhyacionia buoliana on http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Rhyacionia_Buoliana, distinctions are obvious.
This is Rhyacionia pinicolana. I checked this on German website http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Fotouebersicht_Schmetterlingsfamilien_8.
How come Hedya salicella got there?
This is rather Celypha sp., probably Celypha rivulana.
This is clearly not Pandemis corylana by its pattern. Most likely Archips oporana female.
Vitaly, please share this pic on molbiol.ru to ID, I guess they can help.
This is not Spatalia argentina, suppose Notodonta ziczac, might be wrong though.
"Other photos of the specimen" well, I find it hard to handle.
Faulty ID, this is Apocheima pilosaria female.
Phyllodesma tremulifolia.
Phyllodesma tremulifolia it is.
Don't know what happened, might have missed it. Petr, this is Sciota hostilis, to move.
Something tells me this is not Assara terebrella? Better to move to "undetermined".
Petr, what happened to the photo? I see weird red background and blue leaf what's inaccurate?
This looks worn. Ok, let's wait for the new one.
Petr, would you please remove this photo? I'll add later another one, the new.
One more to correct.
Sorry, there's the same thing, Cabera pusaria is misplaced.
My lapse again, Eupithecia nanata must not be in "Other photos of the species".
This one to be moved to "undetermined".
Semioscopis avellanella.
This species is identified correctly.
Semioscopis steinkellneriana.
Seems some bug. Here we can see Larentia clavaria photo, then we press "Larentia clavaria description" and, voila, no photo of this species.
How to mark mines when uploading photos?
:-) Surely not. Just a typo. This is a mine.
Mines and a caterpillar should be all moved to Phyllonorycter ulmifoliella.
Caterpillar not agreed yet. Waiting for Oliver's reply.
This is Phyllonorycter ulmifoliella. Should be moved. Identified by Oliver Rist at Lepiforum.de
Sorry, that's Lacanobia thalassina.
I beg your pardon, but that's Pterapherapteryx sexalata. Should be moved.
And it is possible to allocate the Moscow region alone?
Petr, hi. That's my blunder, I've got it while uploading even though having checked. This is Eriopsela quadrana.
Petr, there are same photos in two doubles, so one couple of them should be removed. That's my mistake, I didn't check it while uploading. Sorry.
Peter understood ispralyus.
Vasily, I checked my computer, no viruses, nothing.
Suppose, that's Plusia putnami. The first lower line at the corner of its wing is short compared to Plusia festucae which has a way longer one.
It Phycitodes lacteella.Opredelenie Vlad Proklov.
This is not Enarmonia formosana. formosana has no white spot.
This is Celypha lacunana.
Note needed: this is Acanthopsyche atra identified by Fabian Fritzer, lepiforum.de.
Abraxas sylvata.
Hi, Petr. It turned out to be Helcystogramma lineolella.
Press "description" link, no such species in the catalog.
News
- 10.12.2024: Новое поле в «Поиске энтомологов»
- 05.12.2024: Insecta.pro maps: filter by taxon
- 30.11.2024: Починена ссылка и страница «Мои подписки»
New photos (20.12.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 19:29, A. Dymchenko: На южном берегу Крыма бабочки ещё л...
- 23:32, V. Titov: Добрый день, коллеги энтомологи!!! ...
- 12:17, E. Kuzmina: Добрый день, коллеги энтомологи!!! ...
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- The petition in defense of biological nomenclature
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Diamondback moths are sterilized to reduce crop loss
