Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64... 169
Corrected data.
Corrected data.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Will female. :)
Yuri, the author's comments are not correct. An instance is not yet displayed and is to come, may come, but can not. Correctly pointed collecting caterpillars pupate and date. :))
Corrected data. Imago → Female.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Yuri, this type of site it is, just that he is in a sort Hypsopygia. Suppose there is worth it.
Corrected data. / → Hypsopygia placens / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Niphonyx segregata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Sinocharis korbae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
If no sites, then look books, always superfluous. :)
The subspecies japonica Menetries, 1857.
Corrected data. Not identified → Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.
Corrected data. Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Anna Gerasimova → Not identified.
On this photo at all or that it is impossible to determine :( Oleg Baking, usually cautious in their definitions. I guess I do not see it. :(
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Lymantria mathura / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Cucullia lucifuga / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Jury to determine that it may not give, only added to the gallery freak. :(
Corrected data. Not identified → Cucullia lucifuga / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Parasemia plantaginis / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
And where all the initial butterflies? Geography? Date?
Corrected data. Not identified → Geometra papilionaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Acleris aurichalcana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Understood thanks. Just 41481, the same author identified V. Sergienko. It seemed to me that this is one butterfly.
Reserves Photo # 37717
Corrected data. Not identified → Gastropacha quercifolia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Nemophora fasciella / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.
And why the author Valery Chernukhin definition?
Corrected data. Not identified → Gastropacha populifolia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Phalera bucephala / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Macrothylacia rubi / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Notodonta dromedarius / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Aedia funesta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Abdomens different course :)) generally copies can be straightened on uglyadet what that difference in the shape of the wing. You're so words, neither of which is not explained, but would like to, and copies of proposed showed. Antennae, but different. I mean, is it worth not very sharp photos, which is invisible all the sex differences indicate the floor.The Germans led only straightened.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Vladimir Bryukhov → Vladimir Savchuk.
Corrected data. Not identified → Pyrrhia exprimens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Basil, I see they only differ mustache if picture quality, others do not see a difference :(
Riveted still "ginandromorfa" of these http://www.lepiforum.de/bh/personen/egbert_friedrich_2/11517_miniata_Miltochrista_m2A.jpg http://www.lepiforum.de/bh/personen/egbert_friedrich_2/11520_miniata_Miltochrista_f2A.jpg here male and female, and show once again, I did not understand
Probably did so, melanistic. Or anything else I can think of no. :) In addition, you also have a normal fly.
News
- 24.10.2024: The forum structure has been reworked. New sections have been added, and many topics have been moved to them
- 22.10.2024: Some photo descriptions have been corrected, and incorrect group bindings have been fixed
- 12.10.2024: Fixed sorting/ordering errors (Gallery and Catalog sections)
New photos (23.10.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 20:33, P. Khramov: New sections have been introduced a...
- 15:01, V. Titov: Личинка мухи из сем. Stratiomyidae....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meantime in Japan
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Streets: insects names
- University of Utah study: young moth males go for females and fail
