Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466... 628
Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.
I'm still at 7:44 asked Eugene, what to do and waited for an answer. But as you can see: spurred :) Frankly, if it were moved the MoD, would without question. In no other area of my Ochlodes not fly :) This in fact I trust: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/33-rhop/hesperiidae/30-hesperiidae
Vasily, I didn't offer any versions on what's this species. Just noted that this photo features the specimen quite well (despite two other pics of the specimen).
Read on old Dysgonia. The truth is it's not my favorite Wikipedia, but here, in the section "Former species" is painted like a who's who is now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgonia
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Not identified → Syngrapha interrogationis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Deltote uncula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
MOVED.
Fixed, excess removed.
Corrected data. Andrey Ponomarev → Vlad Proklov.
Let's keep this.
And I can not answer if you do not know the correct answer? and uncertain to hang until decide :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Erionota torus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Erionota torus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Tanaorhinus viridiluteata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Eudocima sp. Impossible to ID the species with this pic.
Calpinae Quite ragged Eudocima sp.? My diagnosis is that's impossible to ID the species with this pic...... Alas :(
Corrected data. Not identified → Eressa confinis / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Ophthalmis milete / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
According to the blue of the formDysgonia maturatacalled Bastilla maturata (Walker, 1858) Here it is necessary to remove from Dysgonia place here and now as Bastilla.
Moved to tentatively identified accroding to the author's comment. Looks more of T. subocellata: http://www.noctuidae.de/page/art/89_0762.html. There's also another wikipedia pic (don't like it personally but nearly no pics on the web): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Targalla_subocellata_(Noctuidae_Euteliinae).jpg
Thanks, so Pyralidae. I was looking for in Barsine as usual :)
Corrected data. Not identified → Heortia vitessoides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Ectropis lutamentaria (Graeser, 1888) with funeta apparently was driven instead of Sinev: http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/ectropis/index.html There is still full of such inconsistencies due to lack of uniform classification of the site.
Corrected data. Not identified → Athyma perius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Athyma perius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Sorry, not again put so defined.
Corrected data. Not identified → Clostera anachoreta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Amphipyra perflua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Yeah, right! Sorry! You already said that.
Corrected data. Not identified → Hypena tristalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
Corrected data. Not identified → Mythimna velutina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
Corrected data. Not identified → Paradiarsia punicea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
+1 :)
The final touch: it is necessary to remove komenty here and ready to race :)
Well, where shall I go from here :) It's just nerves play tricks on all recently dissolved concoctions (and not only from her). Very poor become: old probably ... :( After the site is already almost five years and I already can not live without it :)
In this photo agree with Alexander, I looked closely (and in comparison with the above features) photo, and yes, it still Plusia festucae.
Corrected data. Not identified → Actebia praecurrens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.
As for the pictures ... I understand that in this case they are first placed on the service side to save photos (eg www.photobucket.com) or any other resource, and then the address of this photo is filled by pressing the "picture from another site" . From my personal experience.As moderator of a very large resource with experience of 8 years and the owner of its own website, which is already 5 ...
Corrected data. Not identified → Arctornis alba / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
endemic Spain
This species is identified correctly.
Corrected data. Bastilla fulvotaenia → Dysgonia fulvotaenia.
By JW I give in and apologize that butted, but it reminds me more aceris (if intermedia its subspecies) or auricoma: both if you believe the notorious Sinev should be there.
Hint: same Acronicta sp.
Corrected data. Not identified → Heliothis maritima / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.
какой смысл этого сообщения?Из ню харайзынц опенинг ту девелопынь репидли!
Corrected data. Imago → Male.
Grounds: 1) http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/140-Euthalia/Euthalia-aconthea 2) http://michibikuhikari.blogspot.ru/2012/09/doubutsu-no-kuni.html (scroll down).
What for? Although I contact him today. You can in fact write the label if the data is there for it (as done in this butterfly).
News
- 22.05.2024: Еще одна цветовая схема
- 14.05.2024: Выложен первый полностью функциональный раздел перенесенного форума
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
New photos (25.07.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 14:37, P. Khramov: Not identified → Ophion luteus / Co...
- 11:28, N. Grebennikov: Ophion luteus (Linnaeus, 1758)....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- Meanwhile, at the "Reptilium"
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Maine needs butterfly surveyors
