Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499... 627

03.11.2013 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24082

Corrected data. Not identified → Protambulyx euryalus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.11.2013 21:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #24387

That I messed up. Corrected. Sergey, when you ship foty - indicates the floor in the corresponding list of "Stage of development / floor" and not to be clarified to mean ...

03.11.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #24388

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

03.11.2013 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #24240

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

03.11.2013 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #17135

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #13970

Clear. I watch the shooting that surely was one and the same individual or not. If anyone can confirm - Confirm ...

03.11.2013 12:09, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #22032

Thank you, Eugene! I am glad that aglaja I also had in mind in his first assumption) So anything made out of that debate, although the impression was just that - the chaos in all kind Argynnis, not only Fabriciana (well, it is in my opinion not spets a))

03.11.2013 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15121

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14806

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14805

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #15696

I postponed it by analogy setim photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15699 there and the author and the region are the same. Alexander rights. Parnas not a band, which can be here, so, "with a light hand" to determine. Even the most ordinary Apollo.

03.11.2013 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #18056

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #17558

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16885

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 8:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #8810

Corrected data. Eudonia lacustrata / Vitaly Gumenuk → Scoparia basistrigalis / Dmitry Borisyuk.

03.11.2013 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #23589

Corrected data. Not identified → Spalgis epius / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

03.11.2013 0:30, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16655

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16059

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16061

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16060

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #16062

Transfer can be: the same shot at Sungaya (at the bottom only colors other Gumenyuk shamans probably): http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1269-autographa-mandarina

03.11.2013 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #14685

We saw Sergei all your confirmation and again they should not be permanently apat: please be considerate. Do not try to impose their personal views, but rather reinforce such arguments (links, etc.).

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15951

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15952

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15949

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15956

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #15954

This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:08, Sergei Kotov: comment on photo #3694

Agree with aforesaid. Couldn't you write it right then for me not to repeat it thrice. I thought you either didn't notice (went back to the third page of comments) or just forgot...