Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345... 629

24.06.2015 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Macrochilo cribrumalis

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 23—26 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July, August.

24.06.2015 14:30, Leon Ortlieb: comment on photo #26906

Heliconius melpomene lucinda ?

24.06.2015 14:23, Leon Ortlieb: comment on photo #31648

Erateina staudingeri ?

24.06.2015 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Spilosoma lubricipeda

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 34—40 mm.

24.06.2015 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Spilosoma lutea

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 34—42 mm.

24.06.2015 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Elophila nymphaeata

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 22—33 mm.

24.06.2015 12:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Geometra papilionaria

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 40—60 mm.

24.06.2015 12:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Alcis repandata

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 40—55 mm.

24.06.2015 11:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Habrosyne pyritoides

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 34—40 mm.

24.06.2015 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #29907

Corrected data. Not identified → Daddala lucilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35336

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Erebus gemmans / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30139

Corrected data. Not identified → Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30152

Corrected data. Not identified → Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30284

Corrected data. Not identified → Isana albiscripta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39201

Corrected data. Not identified → Cechenena aegrota / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #39200

Corrected data. Not identified → Cechenena aegrota / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30341

Corrected data. Not identified → Ochrotrigona praetextata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33500

Corrected data. Not identified → Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30389

Corrected data. Not identified → Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #30386

Corrected data. Not identified → Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.06.2015 22:00, Vladimir Bryukhov: comment on photo #40850

Oh thanks! The more interesting! I watched the photo on this page the determination, but for some reason decided that I C. pamphilus.

23.06.2015 18:46, Dracus: comment on Caddis fly metamorphosis

Gorgeous! A rare sight, and the photos are good!

23.06.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #35613

Corrected data. Not identified → Catephia xylosis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.06.2015 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #33688

Corrected data. Not identified → Daddala lucilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.06.2015 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Agrotis exclamationis

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 30—40 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → May, June, July, August.

23.06.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40857

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.06.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40858

Corrected data. The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.06.2015 1:31, А.Й.Элез: comment on Colias palaeno in the Tugolesky forest

I went to the Batkovskoe swamp on June 20, Colias palaeno was caught in a single specimen, a male and quite fresh. And I caught it on the road, flying together with Aporia crataegi. I never saw a paleno in the swamp itself((I can't tell if it's too early or too late. Who can tell you? Or maybe they fly in some part of the swamp?In any, if only in a light swamp, but not among the very frequent ...

23.06.2015 0:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40852

Corrected data. Coenonympha pamphilus / Vladimir Bryukhov → Coenonympha tullia / Eugene Karolinskiy.

22.06.2015 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #22229

I think it's better to let pobudet fastsellinah inaccurate. Numerous finds that in those places directly point to this)) Pity then that the caterpillar has not taken on removal ......

22.06.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40848

It is also our .. And this same dear :) He lives in an apartment next door to the man :) It is not a natural butterfly ....

22.06.2015 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40842

Corrected data. Not identified → Peribatodes rhomboidaria / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

22.06.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40841

Corrected data. Not identified → Scopula flaccidaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40843

Corrected data. Not identified → Gortyna borelii / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40846

Corrected data. Not identified → Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40844

Corrected data. Not identified → Calophasia lunula / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40845

Corrected data. Not identified → Calamia tridens / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #33565

Corrected data. Furcula bicuspis → Furcula furcula.

22.06.2015 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Apotomis turbidana

Corrected data. Wingspan: No formalized data → 19—23 mm. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July.

22.06.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #40795

Well, so be it)))

22.06.2015 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #26904

Corrected data. Not identified → Heliconius erato / Tentatively identified / Leon Ortlieb.

22.06.2015 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #40797

Corrected data. Not identified → Apotomis betuletana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.06.2015 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #40796

Corrected data. Not identified → Apotomis betuletana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.06.2015 9:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #40780

Corrected data. Not identified → Brenthis daphne / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

21.06.2015 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #40769

No new and old taxonomy. There taxon feisthamelii. Some interpret it as a species, others as a subspecies. All their arguments. It was originally described as a species in the genus Papilio, this author should be put in brackets. I have a question I do not know and do not stick to one of the parties does not.

21.06.2015 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39253

Corrected data. Not identified → Oxyodes scrobiculata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.06.2015 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #39252

Corrected data. Not identified → Oxyodes scrobiculata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.06.2015 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #40801

Corrected data. Confidently identified → Tentatively identified.

21.06.2015 13:54, Frantic: comment on Scope of the taxon Oryctes nasicornis

I have 5 subspecies of nasikornis in my collection (Ukraine, Tajikistan, Spain, Iran, Turkey). Unfortunately, since it is impossible to collect guaranteed maximum major males for correct comparison, conclusions have to be drawn on conditionally large and very large individuals. I would say that the differences that exist in the populations from these places are unlikely to draw on good ...